know me if you visited Gistflow.com – open source blog platform for developers and GitFM.com – personal recommendation service for Github repos (and it is really smart, there is a big math behind the scene).
processes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_refactoring#History So the problem I want to discuss today is that refactoring is already the formed technique.
body of code, altering its internal structure without changing its external behavior Martin Fowler Just read the definition. We will build the whole philosophy on top of it.
deploy" alias csd="cap staging deploy" p() { cd ~/Sites/$1; } _p() { _files -W ~/Sites -/; } compdef _p p Super duper captain tip – use aliases! And not only variables – write functions for example like this – navigating to project in Sites directory.
for about a month – each step is a new feature and each red pile in the bottom stands for amount of broken tests. So as you can see we save our users from 500 pages couple of times and not deployed bad code.
program that possibly indicates a deeper problem. Kent Beck So in refactoring I noticed only one term and it is Code Smell. You may have heard it a lot :)
300 methods and it is a signal that this only model do much, for example if you see methods with the same prefix it is probably time to move this methods to another class (named with prefix).
"CatalogGlobalRubric").each{ |count| count.destroy } catalogs = Catalog2.all puts "Calculation" size = catalogs.size nom = 0 catalogs.each{|catalog| nom = nom + 1 puts nom.to_s + " from " + size.to_s catalog.counters_inc if catalog.approved } return "That’s it!!!" end And here comes the bullshit – in this method you can see many code smells - ambiguous variables, obvious comments, long method, bad naming, everything.
: false end page = (@topic.replies.approved.count / Reply.per_page).to_i page += 1 if ((@topic.replies.approved.count % Reply.per_page).to_i > 0) All code smells before were about understanding the code. I mean that we READ the code and not INTERPRET it as a computer. So bad code make us interpret and it takes a lot of our energy and creativity, this is why we do less and this is why we are getting bored and tired. This is why we should refactor! Here couple of code smells which are about knowing of Ruby standard lib.
!@doc Count.where(:count_type => "CatalogGlobalRubric").each{ |count| count.destroy } Also in Rails there is its own specific and when I want to write some method I first look for in Rails API and in 60% of cases I find it.
method • Replace temp variable with method • Extract/inline class • ... The are quite a lot of refactoring techniques and I am quite sure you know some of them. But checkout Martin’s Fowler book to read them all and remember. As I said before this is very well structured list of refactorings.
– naming and cache invalidation.” Phil Karton My favorite refactoring (and the most difficult for me) is renaming. Your code should be readable besides interpretable.
s(:lit, :name))), s (:defn, :initialize, s(:args, :name), s(:scope, s (:block, s(:lasgn, :name, s(:lvar, :name))))), s (:defn, :say, s(:args), s(:scope, s(:block, s (:call, nil, :puts, s(:arglist, s(:str, "hello"))))))))) So ruby_parser gem provides necessary functionality. It converts ruby code into sexp format which could be analized.
• CodeClimate The most well known solutions for analizing are listed here. For me `reek` is the most useful - it shows what should be refactored, where and how. Be sure to check it.