Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Search
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
Programming
0
120
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Slides from internal presentation at
https://appunite.com
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Maciej Kaszubowski
See All by Maciej Kaszubowski
Error-free Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
330
Modular Design in Elixir (ElixirConf EU 2019)
mkaszubowski
2
720
The Big Ball of Nouns
mkaszubowski
0
97
Modular Design in Elixir
mkaszubowski
1
380
Our three years with Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
240
Distributed Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
150
Software Architecture
mkaszubowski
0
130
Let it crash - fault tolerance in Elixir/OTP
mkaszubowski
0
470
CRDTs - The science behind Phoenix Presence
mkaszubowski
2
260
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
新メンバーも今日から大活躍!SREが支えるスケールし続ける組織のオンボーディング
honmarkhunt
5
7.4k
ISUCON研修おかわり会 講義スライド
arfes0e2b3c
1
450
なぜ「共通化」を考え、失敗を繰り返すのか
rinchoku
1
650
Result型で“失敗”を型にするPHPコードの書き方
kajitack
5
660
The Modern View Layer Rails Deserves: A Vision For 2025 And Beyond @ RailsConf 2025, Philadelphia, PA
marcoroth
1
170
PipeCDのプラグイン化で目指すところ
warashi
1
280
PHPでWebSocketサーバーを実装しよう2025
kubotak
0
290
A full stack side project webapp all in Kotlin (KotlinConf 2025)
dankim
0
120
Rubyでやりたい駆動開発 / Ruby driven development
chobishiba
1
730
「Cursor/Devin全社導入の理想と現実」のその後
saitoryc
0
820
PostgreSQLのRow Level SecurityをPHPのORMで扱う Eloquent vs Doctrine #phpcon #track2
77web
2
530
A2A プロトコルを試してみる
azukiazusa1
2
1.4k
Featured
See All Featured
Fight the Zombie Pattern Library - RWD Summit 2016
marcelosomers
233
17k
Connecting the Dots Between Site Speed, User Experience & Your Business [WebExpo 2025]
tammyeverts
6
300
Git: the NoSQL Database
bkeepers
PRO
430
65k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
53
7.7k
Typedesign – Prime Four
hannesfritz
42
2.7k
Become a Pro
speakerdeck
PRO
29
5.4k
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
productmarketing
PRO
23
3.5k
Templates, Plugins, & Blocks: Oh My! Creating the theme that thinks of everything
marktimemedia
31
2.4k
The Power of CSS Pseudo Elements
geoffreycrofte
77
5.9k
VelocityConf: Rendering Performance Case Studies
addyosmani
332
24k
StorybookのUI Testing Handbookを読んだ
zakiyama
30
5.9k
Building a Scalable Design System with Sketch
lauravandoore
462
33k
Transcript
Concurrency basics For Elixir-based Systems
None
So, what’s concurrency?
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads) Preemptive scheduling
Where’s the benefit?
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Sequential Execution time Waiting time
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time
CPU bound Re Re Re Res Re Res Re Re
I/O bound
Concurrent or Parallel What’s the difference?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads)
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2
root@kingschat-api-c8f8d6b76-4j65j:/app# nproc 12 root@tahmeel-api-prod-b5979bdc6-q5wz6:/# nproc 1 How many cores?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2 (by default) One erlang scheduler per core
:observer_cli.start()
None
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Parallel
Sequential execution
Phoenix Request Req 1
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 2
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 3
Phoenix Request Resp
Concurrent execution
Phoenix Request
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Resp Resp
Resp
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) R2 R1 R2
Time Execution time Waiting time
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) Send resp R2
R3 R1 R2 R3 Time Execution time Waiting time
How much can we gain?
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law in a nutshell The more synchronisation, the less
benefit from multiple cores
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time Almost 100% parallel (almost no synchronisation) DB Server (3 cores)
But…
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not constant DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not infinite DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
R4 R4 Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time R5 R6 R7 R5 R6 R7 DB Server (3 cores)
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3 Remember this?
This isn’t exactly true
None
Connection pool (Prevents from overworking the DB)
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
It gets worse
Pool Manager Mailbox Has to be synchronised
Pool Manager Message Passing Is just copying data in shared
memory
Pool Manager Remember semaphores?
Logger Metrics Sentry
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack Sentry Metrics
OS Threads (Garbage Collection) Data Bus Virtual Machines Memory characteristics
(e.g. processor caches) … Other synchronisation points
That’s hard
That’s REALLY hard
That’s REALLY hard Seriously, people spend their entire careers on
this
So, what to do?
Measure
Measure Measure
Measure Measure Measure
Measure ON PRODUCTION
Measure ON PRODUCTION You WILL get false results on staging/locally
Measure Entire system You WILL get false results for single
functions
Measure ONLY IF YOU HAVE TRAFFIC
“premature optimization is the root of all evil”
If something takes X ms, it will always take X
ms.
Async execution cannot “remove” this time It can only hide
it
BACK PRESSURE
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer Stop
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer OK, give me more
Producent Consumer Consumer
None
Back pressure
Thanks!