Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...
Search
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
0
1.5k
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles
論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi
See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
論文紹介「Evaluation gaps in machine learning practice」と、効果検証入門に関する昔話
stakaya
0
1k
バイブコーディングの正体——AIエージェントはソフトウェア開発を変えるか?
stakaya
5
1.5k
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
stakaya
0
570
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
stakaya
2
2k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
stakaya
0
2k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
stakaya
2
650
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
stakaya
29
21k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
stakaya
1
1.2k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
stakaya
3
370
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
生成的情報検索時代におけるAI利用と認知バイアス
trycycle
PRO
0
300
一般道の交通量減少と速度低下についての全国分析と熊本市におけるケーススタディ(20251122 土木計画学研究発表会)
trafficbrain
0
160
姫路市 -都市OSの「再実装」-
hopin
0
1.6k
ペットのかわいい瞬間を撮影する オートシャッターAIアプリへの スマートラベリングの適用
mssmkmr
0
270
"主観で終わらせない"定性データ活用 ― プロダクトディスカバリーを加速させるインサイトマネジメント / Utilizing qualitative data that "doesn't end with subjectivity" - Insight management that accelerates product discovery
kaminashi
15
20k
J-RAGBench: 日本語RAGにおける Generator評価ベンチマークの構築
koki_itai
0
1.3k
HoliTracer:Holistic Vectorization of Geographic Objects from Large-Size Remote Sensing Imagery
satai
3
620
Sat2City:3D City Generation from A Single Satellite Image with Cascaded Latent Diffusion
satai
4
660
CoRL2025速報
rpc
4
4.2k
HU Berlin: Industrial-Strength Natural Language Processing with spaCy and Prodigy
inesmontani
PRO
0
230
svc-hook: hooking system calls on ARM64 by binary rewriting
retrage
1
100
[IBIS 2025] 深層基盤モデルのための強化学習驚きから理論にもとづく納得へ
akifumi_wachi
19
9.6k
Featured
See All Featured
Practical Orchestrator
shlominoach
191
11k
[SF Ruby Conf 2025] Rails X
palkan
1
760
How Software Deployment tools have changed in the past 20 years
geshan
0
32k
Building a Modern Day E-commerce SEO Strategy
aleyda
45
8.7k
Visual Storytelling: How to be a Superhuman Communicator
reverentgeek
2
440
Prompt Engineering for Job Search
mfonobong
0
160
WENDY [Excerpt]
tessaabrams
9
36k
A brief & incomplete history of UX Design for the World Wide Web: 1989–2019
jct
1
300
[RailsConf 2023] Rails as a piece of cake
palkan
59
6.3k
Navigating Team Friction
lara
192
16k
Making the Leap to Tech Lead
cromwellryan
135
9.7k
Bioeconomy Workshop: Dr. Julius Ecuru, Opportunities for a Bioeconomy in West Africa
akademiya2063
PRO
1
55
Transcript
RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,
David M. Blei 高柳慎一
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND & 2.1 Recommendation Tasks
5
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29
数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34