<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/feed.rss.xml" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bill Venners</title>
    <description/>
    <link>https://speakerdeck.com/bvenners</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://speakerdeck.com/bvenners.rss"/>
    <lastBuildDate>2018-03-21 12:32:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Pragmatic Purity</title>
      <description>Purely functional code is easier to reason about ... is the functional programmer's guiding mantra. But to what extent is it really easier to reason about? This short talk will look at and challenge this claim, and propose a pragmatic attitude towards purity.</description>
      <media:content url="https://files.speakerdeck.com/presentations/c41af7ad95fc491fafa9ebeb88242468/preview_slide_0.jpg?9680309" type="image/jpeg" medium="image"/>
      <content:encoded>Purely functional code is easier to reason about ... is the functional programmer's guiding mantra. But to what extent is it really easier to reason about? This short talk will look at and challenge this claim, and propose a pragmatic attitude towards purity.</content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>https://speakerdeck.com/bvenners/pragmatic-purity</link>
      <guid>https://speakerdeck.com/bvenners/pragmatic-purity</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
