https://speakerdeck.com/handwritingainotes 2026-10-02 23:10:32 -0400 A four-page visual review of one Handwriting AI notebook case. The same sentence is shown beside the source photo, the first font draft and the reviewed result. Eight glyph changes were considered: six were kept, while x and tion were rejected. This is one case, not an accuracy benchmark. Source and full walkthrough: https://handwriting-ai.com/guides/how-to-turn-your-handwriting-into-a-font These slides concern our own product. The explanatory text was generated with AI and checked against the published case; the comparison images come from that case. A four-page visual review of one Handwriting AI notebook case. The same sentence is shown beside the source photo, the first font draft and the reviewed result. Eight glyph changes were considered: six were kept, while x and tion were rejected. This is one case, not an accuracy benchmark. Source and full walkthrough: https://handwriting-ai.com/guides/how-to-turn-your-handwriting-into-a-font These slides concern our own product. The explanatory text was generated with AI and checked against the published case; the comparison images come from that case. Sat, 03 Oct 2026 00:00:00 -0400 https://speakerdeck.com/handwritingainotes/when-an-ai-handwriting-font-needs-a-second-look https://speakerdeck.com/handwritingainotes/when-an-ai-handwriting-font-needs-a-second-look