Slide 1

Slide 1 text

Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Germany [email protected] @chrisma0 Mining for Process Improvements: Analyzing Software Repositories in Agile Retrospectives Christoph Matthies, Franziska Dobrigkeit, Guenter Hesse July ’20 13th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE’20)

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

Motivation & Background 2 Retrospective Meetings and Exercises ■ Regular Retrospective meetings in development processes ■ Opportunities for process improvement [1] ■ Popular in professional software engineering [2] ■ Retro exercises/games to encourage idea sharing [3] ■ Most Retrospective exercises focus solely on gathering perceptions of team members [4] [1] Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland. 2017. “The Scrum Guide - The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game”. 19 pages. [2] Scrum Alliance. 2018. “State of Scrum 2017-2018: Scaling and Agile Transformation”. 36 pages. [3] Derby Esther and Diana Larsen. 2006. “Agile Retrospectives: Making Good Teams Great.” Pragmatic Bookshelf. 200 pages. [4] Corinna Baldauf. 2018. “Retromat - Run great agile retrospectives!”. Leanpub.com. 239 pages.

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

Software Project Data 3 Software Repositories and Other Tools ■ Project artifacts created during regular development activities contain valuable information on the executed process ■ In particular, provide evidence for project problems, e.g. when tests fail [5] or systems go down [6] for long periods. [5] Celal Ziftci and Jim Reardon. 2017. “Who broke the build? Automatically identify-ing changes that induce test failures in continuous integration at Google Scale”. IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track. IEEE, 113–122 [6] Marc Haberkorn and Kishor Trivedi. 2007. “Availability monitor for a software based system”. 10th IEEE High Assurance Systems Engineering Symposium. IEEE, 321–328

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

Research Goal 4 Applying “Mining Software Repositories” Techniques to Retros ■ Mining Software Repositories (MSR) research field [8] ■ Focus: extracting insights from vast collections of software data ■ Approaches have not yet been applied to software process improvement in small, Agile teams Goal: Enable an additional, project data-informed view of development processes using Retrospective activities [8] Ahmed E. Hassan. 2008. “The road ahead for Mining Software Repositories”. Frontiers of Software Maintenance. IEEE, 48–57.

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

Data-Informed Retro Activities 5 Progress Check ■ Without methods to gauge effectiveness of Retros, organizations find it hard to justify expenses of performing Retrospectives [9] ■ Project artifact measurements, based on Retro action items, can provide results interpretable by teams ■ Compare measurements for current and following iterations [9] David G Marshburn. 2018. “Scrum retrospectives: Measuring and improving effectiveness”. SAIS 2018 Proceedings

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

Proposed Retro Activity 6 Remedy Appraisal: An Example ■ Identified issue: single person committing most of the team’s code ■ Action item: Train all team members in VCS usage ■ Data measurement: Track progress by the number of unique contributors to team’s code repository Analyze results in the team, discussion starting points ■ Was the original issue resolved? ■ Does the measurement need tweaking?

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

Conclusion 7 Retrospective Meetings & Data-Informed Activities ■ Increasing knowledge on developers’ interactions is available in project artifacts, which allows improving dev. processes [10] ■ Approaches not yet established in Agile process improvement ■ We propose defining new, data-informed Retrospective activities based on project data measurements ■ Future work: automating data-informed insights, e.g. through chatbots or instant messaging channels [10] L. Singer, M.-A. Storey, F. Figueira Filho, A. Zagalsky, and D.M. German. 2017. “People Analytics in Software Development”. Grand Timely Topics in Software Engineering. Springer, 124–153.

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

Summary 8 [email protected] @chrisma0

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

Image Sources 9 In order of appearance ■ Mining by Firza Alamsyah from the Noun Project ■ perception by Maxim Basinski from the Noun Project ■ goal by Alice Design from the Noun Project ■ Data Driven HR by Vectors Market from the Noun Project ■ discussion by Alice Design from the Noun Project ■ Data by Alice Design from the Noun Project