Slide 1

Slide 1 text

From Predictions to Decisions Bringing Decision Theory to Healthcare Data Science Corey Chivers, PhD bayesianbiologist.com @cjbayesian

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

No content

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

Is this a good model? (1 – Specificity) (Sensitivity)

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

Is this a good model? FP FN TP TN

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

"Good" is only meaningful relative to the "goodness" of the events being predicted and our ability to do something to change them.

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

All models are wrong, but some are useful. - George Box

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

FP FN TP TN

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

How good tho? How good tho? How bad tho? How bad tho? FP FN TP TN

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

Goodness can be measured in any units More adorbs Less adorbs

Slide 10

Slide 10 text

The best decision is the one that leads to the most goodness More adorbs Less adorbs

Slide 11

Slide 11 text

When outcomes are uncertain, the best decision is the one that has the highest expected goodness.

Slide 12

Slide 12 text

When outcomes are uncertain, the best decision is the one that has the highest expected goodness. Machine Learning can only help you with this part!

Slide 13

Slide 13 text

When outcomes are uncertain, the best decision is the one that has the highest expected goodness. Machine Learning can only help you with this part!

Slide 14

Slide 14 text

Healthcare Example Predicted Sepsis Treated a true case (Potential to avoid bad outcome) Predicted Sepsis Treated a false case (unnecessary) Predicted No Sepsis Didn’t treat (all good) Predicted No Sepsis Failed to treat (Bad outcome)

Slide 15

Slide 15 text

Healthcare Example

Slide 16

Slide 16 text

Healthcare Example

Slide 17

Slide 17 text

Healthcare Example • But everything just adds to the ‘badness’ total. • How does that help us decide? • The key is to compare against the alternatives. • Treat everyone? <==> set decision threshold to zero • Treat no one? <==> set decision threshold to one • Some other strategy? <==> Random? Status quo? • Choose the alternative that is least bad • Or, if you prefer the J perspective, multiply everything by -1 and choose the one that’s the most good!

Slide 18

Slide 18 text

Healthcare Example • But everything just adds to the ‘badness’ total. • How does that help us decide? • The key is to compare against the alternatives. • Treat everyone? <==> set decision threshold to zero • Treat no one? <==> set decision threshold to one • Some other strategy? <==> Random? Status quo? • Choose the alternative that is least bad • Or, if you prefer the J perspective, multiply everything by -1 and choose the one that’s the most good!

Slide 19

Slide 19 text

So, like, should we use this model or what? • There are still things we don’t know, like what all these C terms actually are. • Work backwards and ask: • In what range would they need to be for us to choose the model over an alternative strategy? • How much better would the model need to be before we would choose to use it?

Slide 20

Slide 20 text

Treat none Cost of Intervention ($) Cost of event ($) Treat all Pregnancy Related Hypertension (PRH) is the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the U.S. High-risk patients à remote blood pressure monitoring https://healthcareinnovation.upenn.edu/projects/heart-safe-motherhood

Slide 21

Slide 21 text

Assume, evaluate, refine, repeat • Decision theory requires making assumptions, as we’ve done here • Nothing is stopping us from making different assumptions: • “What if the false positives lead to additional harm?” • “What if I have other priorities, like fairness?” • Decision theory analysis is not infallible, but it allows us to: • Get the best possible answers • to the most precisely formulated questions, • when starting from a given set of assumptions

Slide 22

Slide 22 text

Thanks! bayesianbiologist.com @cjbayesian