Slide 1

Slide 1 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk §

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

@brucel • Picture of TBL “web developer”

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

@brucel

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

@brucel

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

@brucel

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

@brucel https://www.igalia.com/open-prioritization/

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk Tim Berners-Lee Takes the Stand to Keep the Web Free Jennifer Doan, a Texarkana lawyer representing Yahoo and Amazon, led the questioning. When Berners-Lee invented the web, did he apply for a patent on it, Doan asked. "No," said Berners-Lee. Doan: "And who owns the web?" Berners-Lee: "We do." https://www.wired.com/2012/02/tim-berners-lee-patent/

Slide 10

Slide 10 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."

Slide 11

Slide 11 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk Did the Early Internet Activists Blow It? Mike Godwin designed to empower internet companies to remove offensive, disturbing, or otherwise subscriber-alienating content without being liable for whatever else their users posted. The idea was that companies might be afraid to censor anything because in doing so, they would take on responsibility for everything. Co-counsel in Reno v. ACLU (1997), a constitutional challenge to the Communications Decency Act

Slide 12

Slide 12 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk Did the Early Internet Activists Blow It? Mike Godwin Another thing we clearly got wrong is how large platforms would rise to dominate their markets Back in the 1990s, we thought that a thousand website flowers would bloom and no single company would be dominant. https://slate.com/technology/2020/02/three-decades-internet- freedom-activism.html

Slide 13

Slide 13 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 14

Slide 14 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 15

Slide 15 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 16

Slide 16 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 17

Slide 17 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 18

Slide 18 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk “I Have Blood on My Hands” “I’ve found multiple blatant attempts by foreign national governments to abuse our platform on vast scales to mislead their own citizenry, and caused international news on multiple occasions. I have personally made decisions that affected national presidents without oversight, and taken action to enforce against so many prominent politicians globally that I’ve lost count.” - quoted in Buzzfeed, 14 September 2020 https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/facebook-ignore-political-manipulation-whistleblower-memo

Slide 19

Slide 19 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 20

Slide 20 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 21

Slide 21 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk p

Slide 22

Slide 22 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 23

Slide 23 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 24

Slide 24 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 25

Slide 25 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 26

Slide 26 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/adult_nudity_sexual_activity

Slide 27

Slide 27 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 28

Slide 28 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 29

Slide 29 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 30

Slide 30 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk Springer law suit The claim is that ABP changes the programming code of websites in order to block inventory, and that this is illegal and infringes publisher copyright. “Advertising blockers change the programming code of websites and thus directly access the legally protected offer of publishers,” Claas-Hendrik Soehring, head of media law at Axel Springer told German site Heise. https://digiday.com/media/inside-axel-springers-war-adblock-plus/

Slide 31

Slide 31 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk WTF FFS OMG “Compared to the original version of HTML, to which many statements still refer with respect to the property of a program, HTML5 shows many characteristics of a programming language, such as concrete control statements. For example, these control statements - or commands - cause the computer with a browser to at least maintain certain priorities when processing programs ("block - i.e. immediately now" (default), "only at the very end" (defer) or "parallel" (async)). This means that the requirements for a computer program, such as those mentioned in the Response to Claim, are met.” "the case law defines a computer program as "a sequence of commands which, when recorded on a machine-readable medium, are capable of causing a machine with information processing capabilities to display, execute or achieve a specific function or task or a specific result”

Slide 32

Slide 32 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 33

Slide 33 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk It’s a USER agent Over the course of its existence, the web has accumulated a multitude of standards and common patterns. While most of these are beneficial for both developers and users, if abused (intentionally or otherwise) web APIs can sometimes be a detriment to user experience. An intervention is when a user agent decides to deviate slightly from a standardized behavior in order to provide a greatly enhanced user experience. Because of its nature, it must be done sparingly and with extreme prudence. https://github.com/WICG/interventions

Slide 34

Slide 34 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 35

Slide 35 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk RFC8890: The Internet is for End Users “When a decision improves the Internet for end users in one jurisdiction, but at the cost of potential harm to others elsewhere, that is not a good tradeoff. As such, we effectively design the Internet for the pessimal environment.” So at its heart, The Internet is for End Users is a call for IETF participants to stop pretending that they can ignore the non-technical consequences of their decisions, a call for broader consultation when making them, and one for continued focus on the end user. Ultimately, end user impact is as least as important as the technical considerations of a proposal. https://www.mnot.net/blog/2020/08/28/for_the_users

Slide 36

Slide 36 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk Godwin: When ordinary people are empowered to come together and work on a common, humanity-benefiting project like Wikipedia, unexpectedly great and positive things can happen. Wikipedia is not the anomaly my journalist friend thinks it is. Instead, it’s a promise of the good works that ordinary people freed by the internet can create. I no longer argue primarily that the explosion of freedom of expression and diverse voices, facilitated by the internet, is simply a burden we dutifully have to bear. Now, more than I ever did 30 years ago, I argue that it’s the solution.

Slide 37

Slide 37 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 38

Slide 38 text

@brucel, www.brucelawson.co.uk

Slide 39

Slide 39 text

No content

Slide 40

Slide 40 text

No content

Slide 41

Slide 41 text

@brucel • [image of a crowd of people - terrible stock photo?]

Slide 42

Slide 42 text

@brucel

Slide 43

Slide 43 text

@brucel

Slide 44

Slide 44 text

@brucel

Slide 45

Slide 45 text

@brucel

Slide 46

Slide 46 text

@brucel

Slide 47

Slide 47 text

No content

Slide 48

Slide 48 text

THANKS ’N’ SNOGS! brucelawson.co.uk @brucel * Other Bruce Lawsons are available. ** known to cause nausea in some jurisdictions.

Slide 49

Slide 49 text

THANKS ’N’ ELBOW BUMPS! brucelawson.co.uk @brucel * Other Bruce Lawsons are available. ** known to cause nausea in some jurisdictions.