Slide 1

Slide 1 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Where every voice shapes the software

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Autonomy, is that what we really want? What we really really want?

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected]

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Autonomy, as described by Mr. Pink, is the urge to direct one's own life. Without the ability to control what, when, and how we work, and who we work with, we'll never be completely motivated to complete a task

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] “Man is born free, but one of the first things he learns is to do as he is told and he spends the rest of his life doing that. Thus his first enslavement is to his parents. He follows their instructions forevermore, retaining only in some cases, the right to choose his own methods and consoling himself with an illusion of autonomy.” — Eric Berne

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Definition of autonomy The quality or state of being self-​ governing especially : the right of self-​ government The territory was granted autonomy. Self-​ directing freedom and especially moral independence personal autonomy A self-​ governing state Autonomy Has Origins in Law Since nomos is Greek for "law", something autonomous makes its own laws. The amount of autonomy enjoyed by French-​ speaking Quebec, or of Palestinians in certain towns in Israel, or of independent-​ minded regions of Russia, have become major issues. The autonomy of individual states in the United States has posed serious constitutional questions for two centuries. The autonomy of children is almost always limited by their parents. But when those parents are elderly and begin driving poorly and getting confused about their finances, their children may see the need to limit their autonomy in much the same way. 1. 2. 3. Source: https://www.merriam-​ webster.com/dictionary/autonomy

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] http://ueberproduct.de/ep-22-​ jabe-​ bloom-​ marc-​ burgauer-​ designing-​ systems-​ pt-​ ii/ “I hate the word autonomy. ... I think autonomy is individuating. ... The way I hear the word and I think other people hear it – and I might be wrong and other people hear it differently – but the way I hear it is “I have the right to make my own decisions. I have the right to make my own rules.” — Jabe Bloom

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Autonomy can be compulsive Photo by Viktor Mui on Flckr

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Photo by Etienne Girardet on Unsplash

Slide 10

Slide 10 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Positive effect from 100% side L Positive effect from 100% side R Negative effect from 100% side R Negative effect from 100% side L Whole Part Polarity map - based on Barry Johnsons work Uniqueness Connectedness Sameness Isolation

Slide 11

Slide 11 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Photo by Martin Rancourt on Unsplash Autonomy on several levels > Code level > Team Level > Teams level > Organisation level

Slide 12

Slide 12 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Autonomy in code No silver bullets and golden hammers Photo by James Harrison on Unsplash

Slide 13

Slide 13 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected]

Slide 14

Slide 14 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] https://martinfowler.com/articles/2021-​ test-​ shapes.html

Slide 15

Slide 15 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected]

Slide 16

Slide 16 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Business stakeholder Domain Experts Other roles involved in designing and building software Code Represents Communicates Communicates Software Team Communicates Tests Represents

Slide 17

Slide 17 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected]

Slide 18

Slide 18 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Positive effect from 100% side L Positive effect from 100% side R Negative effect from 100% side R Negative effect from 100% side L Feeling secure to change the code Cascading changes Sociable Solitary Test in isolation Fast feedback on failure Failure of bug in other class Slower feedback on failure Coherent testing No Mocking coupling Cascading changes on mock/stub Loss of "unit of work" cohesiveness Polarity map - based on Barry Johnsons work

Slide 19

Slide 19 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Autonomy in teams Individuals and interactions over processes and tools

Slide 20

Slide 20 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Like me, please Photo by Judith Prins on Unsplash

Slide 21

Slide 21 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Autonomy IS NOT dictatorship Photo by GR Stocks on Unsplash

Slide 22

Slide 22 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Autonomy is not an excuse to hold something against someone Photo by Pop & Zebra on Unsplash

Slide 23

Slide 23 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected]

Slide 24

Slide 24 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected]

Slide 25

Slide 25 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Sunken Cost Fallacy: Why change now? We’ve already wasted so much money. Photo by NESA by Makers on Unsplash

Slide 26

Slide 26 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Positive effect from 100% side L Positive effect from 100% side R Negative effect from 100% side R Negative effect from 100% side L Always in a releasable state Bugs, Bugs, Bugs Trunk based Actions/heuristics Signals/observations Signals/observations Actions/heuristics Branch Polarity map - based on Barry Johnsons work Freedom Individual creativity Care for the whole Shared mental model in code team effort Loss of cohesive mental models Excessive conformity Compete to change the same code When this happens we need to take action Ensemble/mob or pair programming

Slide 27

Slide 27 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected]

Slide 28

Slide 28 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Autonomy between teams The “Ivory Towers” Photo by Product School on Unsplash

Slide 29

Slide 29 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected]

Slide 30

Slide 30 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected]

Slide 31

Slide 31 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] We should be thinking about limiting the size of software, services, and products to the cognitive load that the team can handle.

Slide 32

Slide 32 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Credits: Eric Evans & https://github.com/ddd-​ crew/context-​ mapping

Slide 33

Slide 33 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected]

Slide 34

Slide 34 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Photo by Ismael Bashiri on Unsplash Enabling teams actively avoid becoming “ivory towers”of knowledge, dictating technical choices for other teams to follow.

Slide 35

Slide 35 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected]

Slide 36

Slide 36 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Positive effect from 100% side L Positive effect from 100% side R Negative effect from 100% side R Negative effect from 100% side L Customer centric Tower of babel Collaboration Actions/heuristics Signals/observations Signals/observations Actions/heuristics Isolation Freedom Team Creativity Work ahead of new technology Uniqueness Connectedness synergy of the whole Care for the customer Loss of equality Isolation Selfish Sameness High cognitive load Excessive comformity

Slide 37

Slide 37 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Heavily focusses on one of the poles

Slide 38

Slide 38 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Autonomy in organizations A continuous negotiation Photo by Mike Kononov on Unsplash

Slide 39

Slide 39 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Vision, boundaries, or both? Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

Slide 40

Slide 40 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Vision, boundaries, or both? Photo by Tingey injury on Unsplash

Slide 41

Slide 41 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Leadership is not Dictatorship It requires us to balance power and Love Photo by Tingey injury on Unsplash

Slide 42

Slide 42 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] We gave them autonomy. Why aren’t they doing anything with it? Photo by Lucas van Oort on Unsplash

Slide 43

Slide 43 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] When there’s autonomy everywhere, do we still need managers and architects? Photo by Miguel a Amutio on Unsplash

Slide 44

Slide 44 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Positive effect from 100% side L Positive effect from 100% side R Negative effect from 100% side R Negative effect from 100% side L Agency Indecisiveness Centralised decisions Actions/heuristics Signals/observations Signals/observations Actions/heuristics Decentralised decisions Empowering teams Spontaneuous Teams acting decisively Empowering the organisation Organisation can coordinate Organisation acting decisively Everyone feels included Organisation cannot coordinate FOMO and feeling left out Burden of consequences for mistakes Disempowering the teams no creativity or spontaneous Lack of team accountability queues

Slide 45

Slide 45 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Patterns of autonomy and isolation are fractal. If you find one at one layer, you can bet you can find the same at other layers as well. Photo by Martin Rancourt on Unsplash

Slide 46

Slide 46 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Autonomy, is that what we really want? > Define and negotiate boundaries continuously > Manage polarities

Slide 47

Slide 47 text

@kenny_baas @[email protected] Leave the judging to the cats!