Slide 1

Slide 1 text

Joshua Stevens 
 — and Science — 
 of the Earth Observatory A look into the NASA Earth Observatory approach to science communication

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

NASA Earth Observatory earthobservatory.nasa.gov • Founded in 1999 • Daily publication of data-driven, scienti fi c imagery • More than 12,000 stories published The Earth Observatory’s mission is to share with the public the images, stories, and discoveries about the environment, Earth systems, and climate that emerge from NASA research, including its satellite missions, in-the-field research, and models. “ ”

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

earthobservatory.nasa.gov NASA Earth Observatory

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

earthobservatory.nasa.gov NASA Earth Observatory

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

earthobservatory.nasa.gov NASA Earth Observatory

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

NASA Earth Observatory earthobservatory.nasa.gov • Inspire readers: show our home planet as NASA sees it • Satellite imagery, maps, data visualization, and storytelling for science news/results, natural hazards, and the beauty of Earth • Target audience: Science-literate, interested public, with an eye toward those who overlook science • Also: educators, media, etc

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

NASA Earth Observatory earthobservatory.nasa.gov

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

NASA Earth Observatory earthobservatory.nasa.gov

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

NASA Earth Observatory earthobservatory.nasa.gov

Slide 10

Slide 10 text

NASA Earth Observatory earthobservatory.nasa.gov

Slide 11

Slide 11 text

NASA Earth Observatory earthobservatory.nasa.gov • This happens because: • EO annual web traffic regularly in the top-10 for all NASA.gov URLs • We cover all Earth sciences funded or enabled by NASA • Our content is easy to use by others (journals, books, videos, museums, Google Earth, etc) • Constant stream of fresh, new, well-explained visuals

Slide 12

Slide 12 text

NASA Earth Observatory earthobservatory.nasa.gov • Who we are: small, diverse team with many decades experience in • Earth science / geography / geology / climate • Journalism / communication / writing • Library and information science • GIS / cartography / data analysis • Web development / programming

Slide 13

Slide 13 text

How we do so much with so little? People Background Experience Connections Ideas Processes Structured meetings Story identi fi cation Science-driven design Editing/review Programs Work fl

Slide 14

Slide 14 text

NASA Earth Observatory earthobservatory.nasa.gov • Story selection • Natural events, disasters, processes • New publications, data products • Story tips from the community… that means you! • BYOD: Bring your own data! • We will collaborate with you to share your science - no cost!

Slide 15

Slide 15 text

NASA Earth Observatory Notes from the Field Contact Kathryn Hansen: [email protected]

Slide 16

Slide 16 text

Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 17

Slide 17 text

• What does it mean for a thing to be “designed?” “Well-designed objects are easy to interpret and understand. Th ey contain visible clues to their operation. Poorly designed objects can be di ffi cult or frustrating to use. Th ey provide no clues—or sometimes false clues. Th ey trap the user and thwart the normal process of interpretation and understanding.” — Don Norman, The Design of Everyday Things Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 18

Slide 18 text

Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 19

Slide 19 text

Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 20

Slide 20 text

Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 21

Slide 21 text

http://www.directedplay.com/ fi

Slide 22

Slide 22 text

• We begin to acquire info from—and make judgements about— graphics before even thinking about it (pre-attentive processing) • Color choices can aid or inhibit this process, and reinforce thoughtful, accurate interpretation later • Is this area hot or cold? • Is this relationship good or bad? • Can I trust this image? • Readers first see “what” then later understand “how much” and “why” Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 23

Slide 23 text

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/elegant fi

Slide 24

Slide 24 text

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/elegant fi

Slide 25

Slide 25 text

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/elegant fi

Slide 26

Slide 26 text

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/elegant

Slide 27

Slide 27 text

https://sci.utah.edu/~vdl/papers/2019_eurovis_implicit-discretization.pdf Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 28

Slide 28 text

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/elegant fi

Slide 29

Slide 29 text

Our eyes and brains are easily fooled ©1995 Edward H. Adelson Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 30

Slide 30 text

Our eyes and brains are easily fooled ©1995 Edward H. Adelson Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 31

Slide 31 text

Design Matters: the Science of Seeing Crameri, F., Shephard, G. E., & Heron, P. J. (2020). The misuse of colour in science communication. Nature communications, 11(1), 1-10.

Slide 32

Slide 32 text

Crameri, F., Shephard, G. E., & Heron, P. J. (2020). The misuse of colour in science communication. Nature communications, 11(1), 1-10. Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 33

Slide 33 text

https://sci.utah.edu/~vdl/papers/2019_eurovis_implicit-discretization.pdf Luminosity (lightness) curves. Color is an axis. Steps between values must be linear! Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 34

Slide 34 text

https://sci.utah.edu/~vdl/papers/2019_eurovis_implicit-discretization.pdf Luminosity (lightness) curves. Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 35

Slide 35 text

https://www.climate-lab-book.ac.uk/2016/why-rainbow-colour-scales-can-be-misleading/ Design Matters: the Science of Seeing Sharp “front” around 300 DU Same “front” No “front” it’s the palette, not the data!

Slide 36

Slide 36 text

Design Matters: the Science of Seeing https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22034369/ Accuracy identifying “Endothelial Shear Stress (ESS)” “It was surprising to fi nd that di ff erent color mapping can render the task less ambivalent. One can only wonder in just how many other instances we make our task more di ffi cult than it needs to be simply by maintaining the status quo.”

Slide 37

Slide 37 text

Camgöz, N., Yener, C., & Güvenç, D. (2004). E ff

Slide 38

Slide 38 text

The human eye has 120 million rods (light sensing) and just 7 million cones (color sensing) Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 39

Slide 39 text

• Scientific color maps should: • Not distort data or introduce false gradients. Show quantitative data with perceptually linear changes in luminosity, not hue. • Use a small amount of hue to convey an intuitive context (hot vs cold, wet vs dry, etc.) • Be accessible to those with colorblindness • Consider the readers of today, not the computational simplicity of yesterday’s engineers Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 40

Slide 40 text

Tools and resources ColorBrewer: https://colorbrewer2.org/ Color Palette Helper: https://gka.github.io/palettes/ Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 41

Slide 41 text

Lava fl ows measured by aerial lidar Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 42

Slide 42 text

Lava fl ows measured by aerial lidar Mount St. Helens Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 43

Slide 43 text

Southeast light source Northwest light source Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 44

Slide 44 text

Tom Patterson (2014) Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 45

Slide 45 text

© 1988 National Geographic Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 46

Slide 46 text

Guillaume-Henri Dufour (1854) Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 47

Slide 47 text

Leonardo da Vinci (1503) Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 48

Slide 48 text

Design Matters: the Science of Seeing Light source

Slide 49

Slide 49 text

Imhof, E. (1982). Cartographic Relief Presentation. (H. J. Steward, Ed.). Walter de Gruyter & Co. Design Matters: the Science of Seeing Untenable theory - not supported by any research!

Slide 50

Slide 50 text

Design Matters: the Science of Seeing Biland, Julien & Coltekin, Arzu. (2016). An empirical assessment of the impact of the light direction on the relief inversion e ff

Slide 51

Slide 51 text

• To sum it up: • Communication must consider the audience—and how their brains work • General public does not know what you know, does not read same journals, is not used to the same software defaults, or the same unchallenged conventions of your field • Prioritize audience psychology over technology or irrelevant physics • If we want people to accept unfamiliar science, we need to be willing to do the same and adjust our approach accordingly Design Matters: the Science of Seeing

Slide 52

Slide 52 text

Thank you! Questions or comments? 
 [email protected] EarthObservatory.nasa.gov 
 @jscarto JoshuaStevens.net