Slide 1

Slide 1 text

www.cdrc.ac.uk www.alex-singleton.com geographicdatascience.com @alexsingleton Consumer Data Research Centre An ESRC Data Investment Alex Singleton Professor of Geographic Information Science University of Liverpool Reproducible Research: Open Methods and Data

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away…

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

• Versioning • Which data files? • Models / Graphs / Maps • How were these made? • Which data? • Sharing Data / Results? • Revisions • Returning to work after review…

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

• Makes the case for pro-austerity policies http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/rogoff/files/growth_in_time_debt_aer.pdf

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

2009 Email Hack - “Climategate”

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

Reproducible Research Data Methods Results Findings / Conclusions

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

• Help mitigate potentially erroneous conclusions • Give public greater assurance • Publicly funded should mean public • It is happening already… Reproducible Research

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

Reproducible Research Number of initiatives to test reproducible research http://validation.scienceexchange.com

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

http://www.nature.com/news/first-results-from-psychology-s- largest-reproducibility-test-1.17433

Slide 10

Slide 10 text

Data

Slide 11

Slide 11 text

No content

Slide 12

Slide 12 text

No content

Slide 13

Slide 13 text

http://adrn.ac.uk/

Slide 14

Slide 14 text

No content

Slide 15

Slide 15 text

http://meredithmmyers.com/ratmap/#/

Slide 16

Slide 16 text

No content

Slide 17

Slide 17 text

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/53.38631/-2.91964

Slide 18

Slide 18 text

z https://vimeo.com/9182869

Slide 19

Slide 19 text

No content

Slide 20

Slide 20 text

https://data.cdrc.ac.uk/

Slide 21

Slide 21 text

Methods

Slide 22

Slide 22 text

https://www.r-project.org/

Slide 23

Slide 23 text

R as a GIS

Slide 24

Slide 24 text

R as a GIS breaks <- classIntervals(variable_to_map, n = 6, style = “fisher”)

Slide 25

Slide 25 text

R as a GIS my_colours <- c(“#FFFFB2”,”#FED976”,”#FEB24C”,
 ”#FD8D3C”,”#F03B20","#BD0026")

Slide 26

Slide 26 text

R as a GIS my_colours[findInterval(variable_to_map, breaks)]

Slide 27

Slide 27 text

R as a GIS plot(LSOA, col = my_colours[findInterval(variable_to_map, breaks)], axes = FALSE, border = NA)

Slide 28

Slide 28 text

http://www.alex-singleton.com/r/2014/02/05/2011-census-open-atlas-project-version-two/

Slide 29

Slide 29 text

134,567 maps; 6.9 years; £138,207

Slide 30

Slide 30 text

2010 Census of Japan Open Atlas Alex Singleton [www.alex-singleton.com] Chris Brunsdon, Tomoki Nakaya, Keiji Yano Version 1.0 ! 2011 Census Open Atlas Alex Singleton (www.alex-singleton.com) Version 2.0 The ability to code relates to basic programming and database skills that enable students to manipulate large and small geographic data sets, and to analyse them in automated and transparent ways. Although it might seem odd for a geographer to want to learn programming languages, we only have to look at geography curriculums from the 1980s to realise that these skills used to be taught. For example, it wouldn’t have been unusual for an undergraduate geographer to learn how to programme a basic statistical model (for example, regression) from base principles in Fortran (a programming language popular at the time) as part of a methods course. But during the 1990s, the popularisation of graphical user interfaces in software design enabled many statistical, spatial analysis and mapping operations to be wrapped up within visual and menu-driven interfaces, which were designed to lower the barriers of entry for users of these techniques. Gradually, much GIS teaching has transformed into learning how these software package, they increasingly look like advertisements for computer scientists, with expected skills and experience that wouldn’t traditionally be part of an undergraduate geography curriculum. Many of the problems that GIS set out to address can now be addressed with mainstream software or shared online services that are, as such, much easier to use. If I want to determine the most efficient route between two locations, a simple website query can give a response within seconds, accounting for live traffic-volume data. If I want to view the distribution of a census attribute over a given area, there are multiple free services that offer street-level mapping. Such tasks used to be far more complex, involving specialist software and technical skills. There are now far fewer job advertisements for GIS technicians than there were ten years ago. Much traditional GIS-type analysis is now sufficiently non-technical that it requires little specialist skill, or has been automated through software services, with a subscription replacing the employment of a technician. The market has moved on. Geographers shouldn’t become computer scientists; however, we need to reassert our role in the development and critique of existing and new GIS. For example, we need to ask questions such as which type of geographic representation might be most appropriate for a given dataset. Today’s geographers may be able to talk in general terms about such a question, but they need to be able to provide a more effective answer that encapsulates the technologies that are used for display. Understanding what is and isn’t possible in technical terms is as important as understanding the underlying cartographic principles. Such insights will be more available to a geographer who has learnt how to code. Within the area of GIS, technological change has accelerated at an alarming rate in the past decade and geography curriculums need to ensure that they embrace these developments. This does, however, come with challenges. Academics must ensure that they are up to date with market developments and also that there’s sufficient capacity within the system to make up-skilling possible. Prospective geography undergraduates should also consider how the university curriculums have adapted to modern market conditions and whether they offer the opportunity to learn how to code. software systems operate, albeit within a framework of geographic information science (GISc) concerned with the social and ethical considerations of building representations from geographic data. Some Masters degrees in GISc still require students to code, but few undergraduate courses do so. The good news is that it’s never been more exciting to be a geographer. Huge volumes of spatial data about how the world looks and functions are being collected and disseminated. However, translating such data safely into useful information is a complex task. During the past ten years, there has been an explosion in new platforms through which geographic data can be processed and visualised. For example, the advent of services such as Google Maps has made it easier for people to create geographical representations online. However, both the analysis of large volumes of data and the use of these new methods of representation or analysis do require some level of basic programming ability. Furthermore, many of these developments haven’t been led by geographers, and there’s a real danger that our skill set will be seen as superfluous to these activities in the future without some level of intervention. Indeed, it’s a sobering experience to look through the pages of job advertisements for GIS-type roles in the UK and internationally. Whereas these might once have required knowledge of a particular I N M Y O P I N I O N, a geography curriculum should require students to learn how to code, ensuring that they’re equipped for a changed job market that’s increasingly detached from geographic information systems (GIS) as they were originally conceived. January 2014 | 77 Learning to code A L E X S I N G L E T O N is a lecturer in geographic information science at the University of Liverpool P O I N T O F V I E W January 2014 | UK £4.50 www.geographical.co.uk M AG A Z I N E O F T H E R OYA L G E O G R A P H I C A L S O C I E T Y ( W I T H I B G ) Geographical HOW INDUSTRIAL FISHING IS EMPTYING THE SEAS AROUND THAILAND Can carbon capture and storage save the world? Deep disposal Manchester is my orchard Turning Moss Side's unwanted fruit into a thriving cider business Net loss "TDFOTJPO*TMBOEq/FQBMq"VSFM4UFJO PLUS

Slide 31

Slide 31 text

Version Control

Slide 32

Slide 32 text

No content

Slide 33

Slide 33 text

No content

Slide 34

Slide 34 text

James Reid - Northern Ireland Atlas (http://ukbdev.edina.ac.uk/Census2011/)

Slide 35

Slide 35 text

Results

Slide 36

Slide 36 text

https://www.rstudio.com/

Slide 37

Slide 37 text

http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rsrs20

Slide 38

Slide 38 text

No content

Slide 39

Slide 39 text

Example

Slide 40

Slide 40 text

http://www.google.co.uk/intl/en_uk/earth/ 52: POORER FAMILIES, MANY CHILDREN, TERRACED HOUSING 51: YOUNG PEOPLE IN SMALL, LOW COST TERRACES 59: DEPRIVED AREAS AND HIGH- RISE FLATS 11: SETTLED SUBURBIA, OLDER PEOPLE Urban Adversity Affluent Achievers

Slide 41

Slide 41 text

1 − Rural Residents 2 − Cosmopolitans 3 − Ethnicity Central 4 − Multicultural Metropolitans 5 − Urbanites 6 − Suburbanites 7 − Constrained City Dwellers 8 − Hard−Pressed Living

Slide 42

Slide 42 text

maps.cdrc.ac.uk

Slide 43

Slide 43 text

https://data.cdrc.ac.uk

Slide 44

Slide 44 text

1 − Rural Residents 2 − Cosmopolitans 3 − Ethnicity Central 4 − Multicultural Metropolitans 5 − Urbanites 6 − Suburbanites 7 − Constrained City Dwellers 8 − Hard−Pressed Living 1−Family Terraces 2−Students and University 3−Constrained and Aging 4−Central Diversity 5−Affluent Suburbs 6−Struggling Families 7−City and Central

Slide 45

Slide 45 text

1-Family Terraces 2-Students and University 3-Constrained and Aging 4-Central Diversity 5-Affluent Suburbs 6-Struggling Families 7-City and Central 2-Cosmopolitans 7.2 34.3 1.8 1.8 0 0 54.8 3-Ethnicity Central 0.9 3.7 0 80.4 0 0 15 4-Multicultural Metropolitans 15 8.8 0 69.9 1.8 4.4 0 5-Urbanites 41.7 0.5 5.9 0 51.5 0 0.5 6-Suburbanites 0 0.5 0 0 99.5 0 0 7-Constrained City Dwellers 15.8 0 67.7 7.6 0.3 8.2 0.3 8-Hard-Pressed Living 23.5 0 9.3 0 6.6 60.6 0 Liverpool Classification National Classification • Central core areas split in Liverpool: Professionals / Students • Although some areas are less affluent, for Liverpool these are not the most distinctive features

Slide 46

Slide 46 text

Family Terraces Within these predominantly terraced areas, there are many families with young children, however, fewer ethnic minorities than the Liverpool average. Most property is owner occupied or rented from the private sector. L13 2AY Colwyn Road Affluent Suburbs These affluent suburban areas feature larger detached and semi- detached houses, many of which are owner occupied. Residents are typically well qualified and in the latter stages of successful careers in the public sector, finance or education. Families who have had children are typically old enough to no longer be dependent. L12 3HB Blackmoor Drive

Slide 47

Slide 47 text

No content

Slide 48

Slide 48 text

Regions and Cities Series

Slide 49

Slide 49 text

Many thanks….