Slide 1

Slide 1 text

Michigan Predator-Prey Project: Wolf-Deer Relationships in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula Tyler Petroelje, Nick Fowler, Todd Kautz, Nate Svoboda, Jared Duquette, Jerrold Belant- Mississippi State University Dean Beyer- Michigan Department of Natural Resources

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

No content

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

No content

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

 Abundance Estimates  Collar and monitor adult female deer  Collar and monitor neonate deer  Collar and monitor predators  Monitor inter-year variation in weather  Estimate available habitat cover and forage

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

 White-tailed deer – Remote camera surveys  Wolves – Track surveys  Coyotes – Howl surveys  Bobcats – Winter hair snares  Black bear – Summer hair snares

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

No content

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

• ’13 – 36 (0.036/sq. km) • ’14 – 38 (0.038/sq. km) • ‘15 - 36 (0.036/sq. km)

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

 Clover traps (January- March)  VHF radio-collar and vaginal implant transmitter on pregnant Does • Survival monitored weekly via airplane • Ground locations 3 times/day during May- August

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

 2013  49 females collared  100% of adults pregnant (42)  89% of yearlings pregnant (9)  2014  45 females collared  100% of adults pregnant (44)  67% of yearlings pregnant (6)  2015  45 females collared  98% of adults pregnant (46)  0% of yearlings pregnant (2)  + 10 winter collared fawns

Slide 10

Slide 10 text

Fawn:Doe Ratio 1:1 Fawn:Doe Ratio 0.27:1 Fawn:Doe Ratio 0.47:1 49 27 6 8 22 7 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Adult Fawn Yearling 2013 Female Male 45 6 7 5 6 4 0 10 20 30 40 50 Adult Fawn Yearling 2014 Female Male 45 10 2 4 11 2 0 10 20 30 40 50 Adult Fawn Yearling 2015 Female Male

Slide 11

Slide 11 text

 2013: 54%  January-April: 70%  2014: 38%  January-April: 42%  2015: ...  January-17 April: 80% Importance of condition between years? Good bone marrow Poor bone marrow

Slide 12

Slide 12 text

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Jan Feb Mar Rump Fat Depth (cm) 2015 2014

Slide 13

Slide 13 text

1.90 2.10 2.30 2.50 2.70 2.90 3.10 3.30 JAN FEB MAR BODY CONDITION SCORE (1-5) Crystal Falls (2013-2015) Escanaba (2009-2011)

Slide 14

Slide 14 text

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 31-Dec 7-Jan 14-Jan 21-Jan 28-Jan 4-Feb 11-Feb 18-Feb 25-Feb 4-Mar 11-Mar 18-Mar 25-Mar 1-Apr 8-Apr 15-Apr 22-Apr 29-Apr Snow Depth (cm) Date Snow Depth '12-'13 Snow Depth '13-'14 Snow Depth '14-'15

Slide 15

Slide 15 text

No content

Slide 16

Slide 16 text

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Number of mortalities 2013 Mortality events 2014 Mortality events 2015 Mortality events

Slide 17

Slide 17 text

 VIT drop site (birth site) searches and opportunistic captures  Measurements and blood/hair samples • Expandable VHF radio- collar and ear-tags • Daily survival monitoring via ground telemetry

Slide 18

Slide 18 text

 2013  43 fawns (26 male, 17 female)  2014  25 fawns (12 male, 13 female)

Slide 19

Slide 19 text

 2013  0 of 43 fawns surviving 2013 (May 2013-May 2014) Apparent survival: 0% (*13 censors*)  2014  2 of 25 fawns surviving 2014 (May 2014 – April 2015) Apparent survival: 11% (*7 censors*)

Slide 20

Slide 20 text

 2013 – average birth mass 3.1 kg (6.8 lbs.)  Lower mass and lesser survival  2014 – average birth mass 3.7 kg (8.1 lbs.)  Greater survival when born with greater birth mass, same trend observed in Escanaba  Why a greater weight following a tougher winter?  Only the adult females in best condition made it through winter  Possibly more singletons, more resources devoted to one fetus rather than two (hard to identify true twinning rates)

Slide 21

Slide 21 text

No content

Slide 22

Slide 22 text

Estimated Fawn Age (Weeks) Number of Predations

Slide 23

Slide 23 text

 Capture with foot hold traps  Morphometrics  Biological Samples  Ear tags  GPS collar Capture totals  4 wolves from 3 packs collared in 2013  5 wolves from 3 packs collared in 2014

Slide 24

Slide 24 text

Predation Investigation  GPS locations implemented into GIS and “clusters” are determined  Cluster is defined spatially as ≥8 locations within 50 m of each other  Search area using technicians and detection dogs

Slide 25

Slide 25 text

 Investigated 568 clusters (2014)  Investigated 868 cluster (2013)  Black bear – 1.6% fawns (insects/berries)  Bobcat – 3.7% fawns (snowshoe hare/grouse/porcupine)  Coyote – 1.6% fawns (snowshoe hare/grouse/adult deer)  Wolf – 3.9% fawns (yearling & adult deer)

Slide 26

Slide 26 text

 Harsh winters resulted in poor condition deer  Very low survival, fewer deer producing fawns.  Largest source of mortality ~ Predation  Coyotes largest predator of adults and fawns, similar to Escanaba study area  Wolves have greater individual predation rate on fawns but at the population level have a lesser impact on the deer herd  Winter of 2014-2015 earlier melt than previous 2 years.  Lesser predation/mortality  Deer condition indices similar to previous years.  Early melt increases survival and may better prepare deer for fawning?  Importance of late winter forage and late season snow depth and melting date. Fawn birth mass and available cover important for survival

Slide 27

Slide 27 text

No content

Slide 28

Slide 28 text

No content