Slide 1

Slide 1 text

Outrigger modes in pulsating white dwarfs J.J. Hermes + Bart Dunlap (UT-Austin) Madi VanWyngarden (BU) Chris Clemens (UNC) Ben Kaiser (UNC)

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

What Exactly Am I on About with “Outrigger” Modes? SDSS J084055.72+130329.5 is one of the richest DAVs observed in K2 Two of the strongest modes look like l=3 septuplets with m=±1 components missing (e.g., i = 60°)

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

What Exactly Am I on About with “Outrigger” Modes? SDSS J084055.72+130329.5 is one of the richest DAVs observed in K2 Two of the strongest modes look like l=3 septuplets with m=±1 components missing But the ν spacings are 19σ incompatible with l=3 modes

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

What Exactly Am I on About with “Outrigger” Modes? Phenomenologically these appear as outriggers to an internal l=1 mode

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

FUV-to-Optical Amplitudes Incompatible with l=3 Modes HST Program 14691 We tested changing geometric cancellation from limb-darkening based on six HST orbits with COS

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

FUV-to-Optical Amplitudes Incompatible with l=3 Modes We tested changing geometric cancellation from limb-darkening based on six HST orbits with COS: likely l < 3 for highest-amplitude modes

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

There Are Significant Nonlinearities in the Light Curve f 1 f 2 f 3 f 1 + f 1 f 1 + f 3 f 1 - f 3 The UV light curve reminds us that the pulse shape is highly non-sinusoidal

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

There Are Significant Nonlinearities in the Light Curve

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

There Are Significant Nonlinearities in the Light Curve

Slide 10

Slide 10 text

There Are Significant Nonlinearities in the Light Curve 3-day sliding window There is significant amplitude/phase modulation, likely from resonant mode coupling see also, e.g., Zong et al. 2016

Slide 11

Slide 11 text

There Appear to Be Four Main Outrigger Modes f 1 f 3 f 9 All four outrigger modes are separated from the nearest mode by exactly 2.4969±0.0017 μHz

Slide 12

Slide 12 text

Re-Observations in K2 Campaign 16 (2.6 years later) f 1 f 3 f 9 All four outrigger modes are separated from the nearest mode by exactly 2.4741±0.0015 μHz

Slide 13

Slide 13 text

More Observations in K2 Campaign 18 (0.4 years later) f 1 f 3 f 9 All four outrigger modes are separated from the nearest mode by exactly 2.4010±0.0048 μHz

Slide 14

Slide 14 text

What Exactly Are “Outrigger” Modes in DAVs? Mode identification via pattern recognition is complicated in the richest K2 DAV UV amplitudes and imperfect splittings suggest this is not an l=3 septuplet Is it at all possible these modes sample multiple distinct cavities?

Slide 15

Slide 15 text

What Exactly Are “Outrigger” Modes in DAVs? Is it possible outrigger modes are purely nonlinear artifacts? If so, how are they generated? Are there further useful tests or numerology to explore? In the spirit of a T/KASC workshop, I would love any thoughts or input you may have!

Slide 16

Slide 16 text

Extra Slides

Slide 17

Slide 17 text

He P.I. zone (30-20 kK) H P.I. zone (13-10 kK) N2 L l 2 DAV Propagation Diagram Core Surface p-modes σ2 > Ll 2, N2 convection zone log σ2 (s-2) g-modes σ2 < Ll 2, N2 DBV: aka V477 Her DAV: aka ZZ Ceti Fontaine & Brassard 2008

Slide 18

Slide 18 text

a) shortest-period modes show long-term stability b) amplitudes start to increase as periods increase c) modes > 800 s feel effects of changing convection zone, as more nonlinearities seen d) mode coupling leads to dramatic outbursts e) amplitudes die off strongly at 10,500 K Hermes et al. 2017, ApJS

Slide 19

Slide 19 text

1000 s 200 s 500 s 125 s m = +1 m = +1 m = 0 345.3 s l = 1 n = 6 Prot = 0.9 ± 0.2 day l = 1 n = 5 316.8 s actual data: KIC 4357037 Most hotter DAVs have symmetric dipole splittings