Slide 1

Slide 1 text

The AI Revolution will not be Monopolized Ines Montani Explosion AI

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

Open-source library for industrial-strength Natural Language Processing in Python

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

Open-source library for industrial-strength Natural Language Processing in Python Company and digital studio, bootstrapped with consulting

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

Open-source library for industrial-strength Natural Language Processing in Python Company and digital studio, bootstrapped with consulting First commercial product: radically efficient data collection and annotation tool, powered by active learning

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

Open-source library for industrial-strength Natural Language Processing in Python Company and digital studio, bootstrapped with consulting First commercial product: radically efficient data collection and annotation tool, powered by active learning You are here!

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

Open-source library for industrial-strength Natural Language Processing in Python Company and digital studio, bootstrapped with consulting First commercial product: radically efficient data collection and annotation tool, powered by active learning Extension platform with a SaaS layer to help users scale up annotation projects SCALE You are here!

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

Open-source library for industrial-strength Natural Language Processing in Python Company and digital studio, bootstrapped with consulting First commercial product: radically efficient data collection and annotation tool, powered by active learning Coming soon: pre-trained, customisable models for a variety of languages and domains You are here! Extension platform with a SaaS layer to help users scale up annotation projects SCALE

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

No content

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

No content

Slide 10

Slide 10 text

No content

Slide 11

Slide 11 text

No content

Slide 12

Slide 12 text

No content

Slide 13

Slide 13 text

No content

Slide 14

Slide 14 text

No content

Slide 15

Slide 15 text

No content

Slide 16

Slide 16 text

No content

Slide 17

Slide 17 text

No content

Slide 18

Slide 18 text

No content

Slide 19

Slide 19 text

No content

Slide 20

Slide 20 text

No content

Slide 21

Slide 21 text

No content

Slide 22

Slide 22 text

The concept of an “AI race” is hopelessly confused.

Slide 23

Slide 23 text

Implications of an “AI race” races are competitive races have winners and losers races have a start and an end

Slide 24

Slide 24 text

What do we mean by AI?

Slide 25

Slide 25 text

What do we mean by AI? Specific consumer products?

Slide 26

Slide 26 text

What do we mean by AI? Specific consumer products? “Artificial General Intelligence”?

Slide 27

Slide 27 text

What do we mean by AI? Specific consumer products? “Artificial General Intelligence”? A technocratic dictatorship?

Slide 28

Slide 28 text

What do we mean by AI? Specific consumer products? “Artificial General Intelligence”? A technocratic dictatorship? A robot army?

Slide 29

Slide 29 text

What do we mean by AI? Specific consumer products? “Artificial General Intelligence”? A technocratic dictatorship? A robot army? Machine Learning research?

Slide 30

Slide 30 text

Monopolizing a new 
 product category?

Slide 31

Slide 31 text

Monopolizing a new 
 product category? Lots of new products will use machine learning Many will be monopolized. By who? Fair question! If different companies make all these products, who “won” at AI?

Slide 32

Slide 32 text

Being the first to develop “Artificial General Intelligence”?

Slide 33

Slide 33 text

Being the first to develop “Artificial General Intelligence”? Very hard to extrapolate from here to proper AGI If someone develops AGI, will it even matter who?

Slide 34

Slide 34 text

Being the first to develop “Artificial General Intelligence”? Whatever you believe about AGI... “AGI is science fiction”
 Okay, so there’s nothing to win “AGI is an existential threat”
 Okay, so nobody will win “AGI will solve all our problems”
 Okay, so everybody wins?

Slide 35

Slide 35 text

Using new technology
 to oppress people?

Slide 36

Slide 36 text

Using new technology
 to oppress people? Oppression is a risk we should talk about in AI But hardly a race we want to win!

Slide 37

Slide 37 text

Winning a literal arms race?

Slide 38

Slide 38 text

Winning a literal arms race? Government research will follow, not lead If everyone publishes openly, nobody will pull far ahead

Slide 39

Slide 39 text

Publishing the most
 machine learning research?

Slide 40

Slide 40 text

Publishing the most
 machine learning research? Open research is collaborative, not competitive If research is published, everyone wins

Slide 41

Slide 41 text

Why don’t companies like Google keep their 
 research secret?

Slide 42

Slide 42 text

Reasons companies publish Attract talent. You can’t get the best researchers if you don’t let them publish Inevitability. Trying to lock down the secrets wouldn’t work anyway Leverage. A higher “AI waterline” is good for their business

Slide 43

Slide 43 text

# Company / Institution Total Papers % 1 Google 60 8.8 2 Carnegie Mellon University 48 7.1 3 Mass. Institute of Technology 43 6.3 4 Microsoft 40 5.9 5 Stanford University 39 5.7 6 University of CA, Berkeley 35 5.2 7 Deepmind 31 4.6 8 University of Oxford 22 3.2 9 University of Illinois 20 2.9 10 Georgia Institute of Technology 18 2.7 Source: NIPS Accepted Papers Stats by Robbie Allen (Medium) Nobody “dominates” 
 machine learning research

Slide 44

Slide 44 text

Original source: gpo.gov NOV 20

Slide 45

Slide 45 text

But what about the data? Reusing data is like reusing code. If it doesn’t do what you want, it’s not very useful. Personal data matters when it’s about you personally. General knowledge is easy to acquire. It doesn’t need unique proprietary datasets.

Slide 46

Slide 46 text

Data alone won’t grant 
 anyone a monopoly Data has diminishing returns Making your dataset 10× bigger doesn’t 
 make it 10× better It’s just not that expensive! What datasets cost more than a manufacturing plant?

Slide 47

Slide 47 text

We won’t all be buying “AI” from the AI Store.

Slide 48

Slide 48 text


 Companies are in-housing Machine learning is software development, 
 it needs to evolve with the project Nobody has a monopoly on AI expertise, 
 people are learning quickly Owning and controlling the data is crucial for 
 many applications

Slide 49

Slide 49 text

Vendors can provide
 products, not magic The challenge is taking what’s theoretically possible and applying it to a problem What matters is making the right decisions for the larger application

Slide 50

Slide 50 text


 Buyers aren’t old and stupid Tech illiterate management stereotype is outdated Most companies let developers choose their tools Developers strongly prefer open technologies: more flexible, better career growth

Slide 51

Slide 51 text

Rich open-source ecosystem Library GitHub URL GitHub Stars TensorFlow tensorflow/tensorflow 115k scikit-learn scikit-learn/scikit-learn 32k PyTorch pytorch/pytorch 21k XGBoost dmlc/xgboost 14k spaCy explosion/spacy 11k Gensim RaRe-Technologies/gensim 8k NLTK nltk/nltk 7k NLTK Source: GitHub (November 2018)

Slide 52

Slide 52 text

So, who’s going to win at AI then?

Slide 53

Slide 53 text

✊ The AI revolution will not 
 be monopolized There’s no single “AI race” – lots of people are building lots of things There’s no magic solution waiting to be discovered Nothing about machine learning suggests a monopoly or a winner-takes-all market

Slide 54

Slide 54 text

Thanks! Explosion AI
 explosion.ai Follow us on Twitter
 @_inesmontani
 @explosion_ai