Slide 1

Slide 1 text

Experiments in the digital age Matthew J. Salganik Department of Sociology, Princeton University & Cornell Tech IC2S2 June 25, 2016

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age Social Scientists ←→ Data Scientists

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

Isn’t computational social science a fad?

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

Fenn and Raskino (2008)

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

Found data vs designed data

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

Observing behavior Asking questions Running experiments Creating mass collaboration

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

Observing behavior Asking questions Running experiments Creating mass collaboration

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

No content

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

No content

Slide 10

Slide 10 text

What’s the same? recruiting participants randomization treatment delivering treatment and control measuring outcomes

Slide 11

Slide 11 text

What’s the same? recruiting participants randomization treatment delivering treatment and control measuring outcomes What’s different? Fully digital experiment leads to zero variable cost data.

Slide 12

Slide 12 text

What’s the same? recruiting participants randomization treatment delivering treatment and control measuring outcomes What’s different? Fully digital experiment leads to zero variable cost data. Constraint on size is not cost, it is ethics.

Slide 13

Slide 13 text

Lab experiments Field experiments

Slide 14

Slide 14 text

Analog Digital Lab experiments Field experiments

Slide 15

Slide 15 text

Moving beyond simple experiments

Slide 16

Slide 16 text

Research Article The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms P. Wesley Schultz,1 Jessica M. Nolan,2 Robert B. Cialdini,3 Noah J. Goldstein,3 and Vladas Griskevicius3 1California State University, San Marcos; 2University of Arkansas; and 3Arizona State University ABSTRACT—Despite a long tradition of effectiveness in laboratory tests, normative messages have had mixed success in changing behavior in field contexts, with some studies showing boomerang effects. To test a theoretical account of this inconsistency, we conducted a field exper- iment in which normative messages were used to promote household energy conservation. As predicted, a descriptive normative message detailing average neighborhood usage produced either desirable energy savings or the undesir- able boomerang effect, depending on whether households were already consuming at a low or high rate. Also as predicted, adding an injunctive message (conveying social approval or disapproval) eliminated the boomerang effect. The results offer an explanation for the mixed Tabanico, & Rendo ´n, in press). Such social-norms marketing campaigns have emerged as an alternative to more traditional approaches (e.g., information campaigns, moral exhortation, fear- inducing messages) designed to reduce undesirable conduct (Donaldson, Graham, Piccinin, & Hansen, 1995). The rationale for the social-norms marketing approach is based on two consistent findings: (a) The majority of individuals overestimate the prevalence of many undesirable behaviors, such as alcohol use among peers (e.g., Borsari & Carey, 2003; Prentice & Miller, 1993), and (b) individuals use their percep- tions of peer norms as a standard against which to compare their own behaviors (e.g., Baer, Stacy, & Larimer, 1991; Clapp & McDonell, 2000; Perkins & Berkowitz, 1986). Social-norms marketing campaigns seek to reduce the occurrence of delete- PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE

Slide 17

Slide 17 text

Figures from Allcott (2011)

Slide 18

Slide 18 text

No content

Slide 19

Slide 19 text

No content

Slide 20

Slide 20 text

Figures from Allcott (2011)

Slide 21

Slide 21 text

Figures from Allcott (2011)

Slide 22

Slide 22 text

No content

Slide 23

Slide 23 text

If you want to move beyond simple experiments: Heterogeneity of treatment effects External validity Mechanisms

Slide 24

Slide 24 text

Making it happen

Slide 25

Slide 25 text

No content

Slide 26

Slide 26 text

No content

Slide 27

Slide 27 text

No content

Slide 28

Slide 28 text

No content

Slide 29

Slide 29 text

Drive variable cost to 0

Slide 30

Slide 30 text

No content

Slide 31

Slide 31 text

No content

Slide 32

Slide 32 text

Main sources of variable costs: staff time participant payment

Slide 33

Slide 33 text

Main sources of variable costs: staff time participant payment Solutions: Automation (your experiments should run while you sleep) Design enjoyable experiments

Slide 34

Slide 34 text

Music Lab: a zero variable cost experiment with Peter Dodds and Duncan Watts

Slide 35

Slide 35 text

No content

Slide 36

Slide 36 text

No content

Slide 37

Slide 37 text

No content

Slide 38

Slide 38 text

No content

Slide 39

Slide 39 text

Subjects condition Independent World 1 condition World 8 World Social influence

Slide 40

Slide 40 text

(a) Less social influence (b) More social influence

Slide 41

Slide 41 text

Results: More social influence leads to more unpredictability

Slide 42

Slide 42 text

Results: More social influence leads to more unpredictability You can predict failure but you can’t predict success

Slide 43

Slide 43 text

No content

Slide 44

Slide 44 text

Zero variable cost is a means not an end.

Slide 45

Slide 45 text

Important difference between: zero variable cost and zero variable cost to you

Slide 46

Slide 46 text

Ethics: The 3 R’s

Slide 47

Slide 47 text

http://www.kittenwar.com/kittens/69827/

Slide 48

Slide 48 text

The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique by Russell and Burch (1959) Replace Refine Reduce

Slide 49

Slide 49 text

No content

Slide 50

Slide 50 text

No content

Slide 51

Slide 51 text

No content

Slide 52

Slide 52 text

Replace experiments with less invasive methods

Slide 53

Slide 53 text

Replace experiments with less invasive methods

Slide 54

Slide 54 text

Refine treatments to make them less harmful

Slide 55

Slide 55 text

Refine treatments to make them less harmful Rather than blocking posts, they could have boosted posts

Slide 56

Slide 56 text

Reduce the number of participants Difference-in-difference estimator rather than a difference-of-means estimator. Would have cut the required sample size, perhaps by half (based on Deng et al. (2013) & Xie and Aurisset (2016)).

Slide 57

Slide 57 text

When should we care about reducing the number of participants?

Slide 58

Slide 58 text

When should we care about reducing the number of participants? 1. uncertainty about whether the experiment will cause harm 2. the experiment was large 3. participation was not voluntary

Slide 59

Slide 59 text

No content

Slide 60

Slide 60 text

With great power there must also come great responsibility

Slide 61

Slide 61 text

The 3 Rs shows that humane methods can be an opportunity:

Slide 62

Slide 62 text

The 3 Rs shows that humane methods can be an opportunity: potentially more efficient than standard methods

Slide 63

Slide 63 text

The 3 Rs shows that humane methods can be an opportunity: potentially more efficient than standard methods stimulates interesting research (e.g., differential privacy)

Slide 64

Slide 64 text

1. Observing behavior 2. Asking questions 3. Running experiments 4. Creating mass collaboration

Slide 65

Slide 65 text

Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age Social Scientists ←→ Data Scientists

Slide 66

Slide 66 text

Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age Social Scientists ←→ Data Scientists Open Review begins August 18 http://bitbybitbook.com