So ware Testing on the Web Martin Schütte 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Outline So ware Quality Documentation Unit Testing PHPUnit Continuity Web Drivers Behaviour Testing Meta PHP Behat and Ruby Cucumber Codeception Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 2 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Main Questions How can I know (my) so ware is correct? How does my boss know so ware is correct? How can we discuss what “correct” is, anyway? We always need: • implicit assumptions, • explicit specifications. Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 3 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Walking on water and developing so ware from a specification are easy if both are frozen. – Edward V. Berard Let’s just update PHP… Let’s just change the DB schema… Let’s just add feature X… Is the so ware still correct? Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 4 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Maintainability requires Documentation Consistency of: 1. Code 2. Comments 3. Documentation When code and comments disagree, both are probably wrong. – Norm Schryer Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 5 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Levels of Documentation . . abstract . concrete . Libraries, Functions . Subsystems . External API . UI Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 6 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion PHPdoc/JavaDoc/Doxygen etc. . . /** * Gets single server parameter for specified key. * * @param string $key A key of the parameter to get * @param string $default A default value when key is undefined * * @return string A value of the parameter */ public function getServerParameter($key, $default = ’’) { return (isset($this->server[$key])) ? $this->server[$key] : $default; } Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 7 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Low Level Documentation Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 8 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion High Level Documentation Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 9 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Levels of Testing . . abstract . concrete . Unit Tests . System Tests . Acceptance Tests Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 10 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Regression Testing Bug Tracker = Documentation Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 11 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion PHPUnit class DTABaseTest extends PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase { protected function setUp() { $this->fixture = new DTABase(); } public function testGetNumTooShort() { $input = ”12345”; $off = 3; $len = 4; $rc = $this->fixture->getNum($input, $off, $len); $this->assertEquals(”45”, $rc); } // ... } Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 12 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion PHPUnit ~/Payment_DTA> phpunit tests/DTABaseTest.php PHPUnit 3.6.11 by Sebastian Bergmann. F.... Time: 0 seconds, Memory: 3.75Mb There was 1 failure: 1) DTABaseTest::testGetNumTooShort Failed asserting that 45.001 matches expected ’45’. /usr/home/mschuett/Payment_DTA/tests/DTABaseTest.php:50 /usr/local/bin/phpunit:46 FAILURES! Tests: 5, Assertions: 5, Failures: 1. Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 13 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Tests are Documentation ~/Payment_DTA> phpunit --testdox tests/DTABaseTest.php PHPUnit 3.6.11 by Sebastian Bergmann. DTABase [ ] Get num too short [x] Get num offset too big [x] Get str too short [x] Get str offset too big [x] Get str invalid Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 14 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion WordPress Unit Tests http://unit-tests.trac.wordpress.org/ . . vagrant@wp:~/trunk$ phpunit Running as single site... To run multisite, use -c multisite.xml Not running ajax tests... To execute these, use --group ajax. PHPUnit 3.6.12 by Sebastian Bergmann. Configuration read from /home/vagrant/trunk/phpunit.xml ................F....................................SS.....S 61 / 1437 ( 4%) S...SSSSSS.............S..SSS..........SS................S... 122 / 1437 ( 8%) .......SS.SSSS...............S.................S............. 183 / 1437 ( 12%) ...............................S............S................ 244 / 1437 ( 16%) .S........................S.................S.......I........ 305 / 1437 ( 21%) .........................SSSS.S..SSS......................... 366 / 1437 ( 25%) ............................................................. 427 / 1437 ( 29%) ............................................................. 488 / 1437 ( 33%) ............................................................. 549 / 1437 ( 38%) ............................................................. 610 / 1437 ( 42%) ..................................................S.......... 671 / 1437 ( 46%) .......SSSSSSSSSSSSSS...........SS........................... 732 / 1437 ( 50%) .............SS...............SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS............. 793 / 1437 ( 55%) ................SSS...S.SSSSSSS................SSSSSSS....... 854 / 1437 ( 59%) .............S..SS....FFF....SSSS.SS......................SSS 915 / 1437 ( 63%) ............................................................. 976 / 1437 ( 67%) ......S..................................................S..S 1037 / 1437 ( 72%) ................SS.S.........................S............... 1098 / 1437 ( 76%) ...............S..................S.......................... 1159 / 1437 ( 80%) ............................................................. 1220 / 1437 ( 84%) .......................F..............................S...... 1281 / 1437 ( 89%) ............................................................. 1342 / 1437 ( 93%) .............................................SS. Time: 08:56, Memory: 122.75Mb [...] FAILURES! Tests: 1390, Assertions: 5640, Failures: 5, Incomplete: 1, Skipped: 117. Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 15 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion PHPUnit Code Coverage Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 16 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Things to build upon Automated Testing • git bisect run phpunit: find commit that introduces a bug • Continuous Integration: • frequent check-ins to mainline branch • verified by automated builds and tests • Continuous Deployment: • automated deployment to production • useful: automated rollback Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 17 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Example: Jenkins CI Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 18 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Example: Travis CI for GitHub Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 19 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Approaches to Unit Testing • Exploratory testing (e. g. for 3rd party libs) • Regression testing (for found & fixed bugs) • Spike and Stabilise testing (a er code, before refactoring) • Test Driven Development (TDD): test first, then code Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 20 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence! – Edsger Dijkstra, Notes on Structured Programming Testing by itself does not improve so ware quality. Test results are an indicator of quality, but in and of themselves, they don’t improve it. […] If you want to improve your so ware, don’t test more; develop better. – Steve McConnell, Code Complete Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 21 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Cost of Testing • Testing (like Documentation) has a cost • o en: productivity improvement > cost • but ROI depends on type of project/so ware Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 22 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion HTTP API class TumblrAPITest extends PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase { public function testPostDatetime() { $url = ”http://staff.tumblr.com/api/read”; $ch = curl_init($url); curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, 1); $xmlsrc = curl_exec($ch); $xmlobj = new SimpleXMLElement($xmlsrc); $str_date = date_timestamp_get(date_create( $xmlobj->posts->post[0][’date-gmt’])); $unix_date = intval( $xmlobj->posts->post[0][’unix-timestamp’]); $this->assertEquals($str_date, $unix_date); } } Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 23 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion HTML-Content class WpCampTest extends PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase { public function testSiteTitle() { $url = ”http://wpcamp.de/”; $ch = curl_init($url); curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, 1); $xmlsrc = curl_exec($ch); $dom = @DOMDocument::loadHTML($xmlsrc); $title = $dom->getElementsByTagName(’title’) ->item(0)->textContent; $this->assertContains(’Das WordPress Event’, $title); } } . Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 24 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Goutte a simple PHP Web Scraper class WpCampTest extends PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase { public function testSiteTitle() { $client = new Client(); $crawler = $client ->request(’GET’, ’http://wpcamp.de/’); $title = $crawler ->filter(’html head title’) ->first()->text(); $this->assertContains(’Das WordPress Event’, $title); } } Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 25 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Selenium a suite of tools to automate web browsers across platforms class WpTest extends PHPUnit_Extensions_SeleniumTestCase { public function setUp() { $this->setHost(”localhost”); $this->setBrowser(”firefox”); $this->setBrowserUrl(”http://wpcamp.de/”); } public function testSiteTitle() { $this->open(”/”); $this->assertText(”//html/head/title”, ”Das WordPress Event *”); } Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 26 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Selenium, contd. public function testSearch() { $this->open(”/”); $this->type(”id=s”, ”sponsoren”); $this->click(”id=searchsubmit”); $this->waitForPageToLoad(”30000”); $this->assertText(”css=#content”, ”regexp:.*Premium-Sponsor Chocri.*”); $this->assertText(”css=#content”, ”regexp:.*Platin-Sponsor Adobe.*”); } } Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 27 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Behat Mink an acceptance test framework for web applications class WpCampTest extends PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase { public function setUp() { $driver = new \Behat\Mink\Driver\GoutteDriver(); $this->session = new \Behat\Mink\Session($driver); } public function testSiteTitle() { $this->session->visit(’http://wpcamp.de/’); $title = $this->session->getPage() ->find(’css’, ’html head title’)->getText(); $this->assertContains(’Das WordPress Event’, $title); } Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 28 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Behat Mink, contd. public function testSearch() { $this->session->visit(’http://wpcamp.de/’); $page = $this->session->getPage(); $page->find(’css’, ’#s’)->setValue(’Sponsoren’); $page->find(’css’, ’#searchsubmit’)->press(); $text = $this->session->getPage() ->find(’css’, ’#content’)->getText(); $this->assertContains( ’Premium-Sponsor Chocri’, $text); $this->assertContains( ’Platin-Sponsor Adobe’, $text); } } Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 29 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion The Big Picture . . Mink . . PHPUnit . Selenium . Sahi . Goutte . Zombie.js . Opera . Firefox Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 30 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Problems with Web Drivers Differences in: • web functionality (HTML, CSS, JS, AJAX) ⇒ performance • selectors (ID, CSS, XPath, DOM) • test functionality and integration with test framework Recommendation: Select two Drivers, 1. simple and fast one for unit testing and 2. Selenium/Sahi for integration and UX testing. Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 31 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Testing in Production = Monitoring Example: check webshop availability Possible layers: • ping server • check HTTP status ”200 OK” • check homepage title • login as user • complete order process Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 32 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion The next level: Behaviour Tests Funktionalität: Selbstpräsentation Um etwas über das WPCamp zu erfahren Als Besucher Möchte ich Infos auf der Website finden Szenario: Sponsoren suchen Angenommen ich bin auf ”/” Und ich suche nach ”sponsoren” Dann ich sollte ”Premium-Sponsor Chocri” sehen Und ich sollte ”Platin-Sponsor Adobe” sehen Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 33 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Next Level: Behaviour Driven Development TDD with other syntax? Is BDD the same as TDD? Yes. If you’re a programmer, and your entire team is programmers, and all your stakeholders are programmers. – Dan North We don’t call them “acceptance tests” because you can’t ask a business person “Please help me with my acceptance test”. Try “I’d like to talk to you about the scenario where…” instead. Or, “Can you give me an example?” Either of these are good. – Liz Keogh Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 34 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Unit & Behaviour Testing Unit Tests • unit testing • programmers • programming language • bottom-up • assertXYZ • tests derived from user stories ⇒ development tool Behaviour Tests • acceptance test scenarios • non-developers • language of business domain • top-down / outside-in • X should do Y • execute user stories ⇒ communication tool Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 35 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion One Notation/“Language”: Gherkin Feature: [one line describing the story] In order to [benefit] As a [role] I want [feature] Scenario: [A scenario specific goal] Given [Something that needs to have happened or be true] When [Some task I must do] And [Another task] Then [Some way I know I’ve achieved my goal] Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 36 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion I18N # language: de Funktionalität: [one line describing the story] Um zu erreichen [benefit] Als [role] Möchte ich [feature] Szenario: [Title] Angenommen [context] Wenn [event] Dann [outcome] Und [another outcome] Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 37 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion TDD with other syntax? Scenario: New lists are empty Given a new list Then the list should be empty. Scenario: Lists with things in them are not empty. Given a new list When we add an object Then the list should not be empty. . Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 38 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Implementation / Translation A look behind the curtain: • framework is clever but not magical • some translation needed • statements have to become executable code Mechanism: • plain sentence → method name • quoted words → arguments • matching with annotated RegExp • methods yield success, exception, or pending exception Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 39 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Behat/Mink FeatureContext.php use Behat\MinkExtension\Context\MinkContext; class FeatureContext extends BehatContext { public function __construct(array $parameters) { $this->useContext(’mink’, new MinkContext()); } } MinkContext adds web-related methods and their I18N translations, e. g.: • visit($page) • fillField($field, $value) • pressButton($button) Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 40 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Behat Output [mschuett@dagny] ~/wpcamp/code% ./vendor/bin/behat Funktionalität: Selbstpräsentation Um etwas über das WPCamp zu erfahren Als Besucher Möchte ich Infos auf der Website finden Szenario: Sponsoren suchen # features/wpcamp.feature:8 Angenommen ich bin auf ”/” # Behat\MinkExtension\Context\MinkContext::visit Und ich suche nach ”sponsoren” Dann ich sollte ”Premium-Sponsor Chocri” sehen # Behat\MinkExtension\Context\MinkContext::asser Und ich sollte ”Platin-Sponsor Adobe” sehen # Behat\MinkExtension\Context\MinkContext::asser 1 scenario (1 undefined) 4 steps (1 passed, 2 skipped, 1 undefined) 0m1.574s You can implement step definitions for undefined steps with these snippets: /** * @Given /^ich suche nach ”([^”]*)”$/ */ public function ichSucheNach($arg1) { throw new PendingException(); } Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 41 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Edit FeatureContext.php add method /** * @Given /^ich suche nach ”([^”]*)”$/ */ public function ichSucheNach($arg) { return array( new When(”I fill in \”s\” with \”$arg\””), new When(”I press \”searchsubmit\””), ); } Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 42 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Behat Output [mschuett@dagny] ~/wpcamp/code% ./vendor/bin/behat Funktionalität: Selbstpräsentation Um etwas über das WPCamp zu erfahren Als Besucher Möchte ich Infos auf der Website finden Szenario: Sponsoren suchen # features/wpcamp.feature:8 Angenommen ich bin auf ”/” # Behat\MinkExtension\Context\MinkContext::visit Und ich suche nach ”sponsoren” # FeatureContext::ichSucheNach() Dann ich sollte ”Premium-Sponsor Chocri” sehen # Behat\MinkExtension\Context\MinkContext::asser Und ich sollte ”Platin-Sponsor Adobe” sehen # Behat\MinkExtension\Context\MinkContext::asser 1 scenario (1 passed) 4 steps (4 passed) 0m2.59s Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 43 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion The Big Picture (PHP) . . Mink . Behat . PHPUnit . Selenium . Sahi . Goutte . Zombie.js . Opera . Firefox Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 44 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Cucumber original Ruby version, nicer syntax # Example Webrat step definitions When /I search for ”(.*)”/ do |query| @browser.text_field(:name, ’s’).set(query) @browser.button(:name, ’searchsubmit’).click end Then /I should see/ do |text| @browser.text.should =~ /#{text}/m end Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 45 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion The Big Picture (Ruby) . . Cucumber . Selenium . Watir . Webrat . Celerity . Opera . Firefox Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 46 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Codeception unit test a new full-stack testing PHP framework $I = new CodeGuy($scenario); $I->wantTo(’perform actions and see results’); $I->testMethod(’DateTime.getTimestamp’); $date = new DateTime(”2012-10-13T14:45:00+02:00”); $I->executeTestedMethodOn($date); $I->seeResultIs(’int’); $I->seeResultEquals(1350132300); Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 47 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Codeception acceptance test $I = new WebGuy($scenario); $I->wantTo(’find infos on the website’); $I->see(’Das WordPress Event’, ’html head title’); $I->fillField(’s’, ’sponsoren’); $I->click(’searchsubmit’); $I->see(’Premium-Sponsor Chocri’, ’#content’); $I->see(’Platin-Sponsor Adobe’, ’#content’); Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 48 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Codeception Output [mschuett@dagny] ~/wpcamp/code% php codecept.phar run --steps Codeception PHP Testing Framework v1.1.4 Powered by PHPUnit 3.6.10 by Sebastian Bergmann. Suite unit started Trying to perform actions and see results (exampleCept.php) Scenario: * I test method ”DateTime.getTimestamp” * I execute tested method on ”DateTime” * I see result is ”int” * I see result equals ”1350132300” OK Suite functional started Suite acceptance started Trying to find infos on the website (wpcampCept.php) Scenario: * I am on page ”/” * I see ”Das WordPress Event”,”html head title” * I fill field ”s”,”sponsoren” * I click ”searchsubmit” * I see ”Premium-Sponsor Chocri”,”#content” * I see ”Platin-Sponsor Adobe”,”#content” OK Time: 4 seconds, Memory: 9.50Mb OK (2 tests, 5 assertions) Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 49 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Problems • most Web tests require known DB state • behaviour testing is slow • only run locally • use in-memory DB • draw the line • features in documentation (what) → add behaviour test • mere implementation (how) → only unit tests Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 50 / 51 

. . So ware Quality . . . . . Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unit Testing . . . . . . . . . . Web Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Behaviour Testing . . Conclusion Summary Value individuals and interactions over processes and tools – The Agile Manifesto Links: • PHPUnit • Selenium • Behat & Mink • Cucumber • Codeception • Sebastian Bergmann (PHPUnit) • Dan North’s blog (BDD) • Liz Keogh’s blog (BDD) • Geek and Poke • Not Invented Here Martin Schütte So ware Testing on the Web 2012-10-13 51 / 51