Slide 1

Slide 1 text

The Flipped Classroom. © Matthew C. Draycott 2014

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

Inverted Classroom…

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

Blooms Taxonomy Out of Class In The Class }   }  

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

Roots in the 'community of enquiry' approach envisioned by John Dewy

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

Roots in the 'community of enquiry' approach envisioned by John Dewy It’s a extensions of the 'teacher as facilitator' concept and Eric Mazer’s work on peer instruction.

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

Roots in the 'community of enquiry' approach envisioned by John Dewy It’s a extensions of the 'teacher as facilitator' concept and Eric Mazer’s work on peer instruction. Alison King in "From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side” College Teaching, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 30–35.

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

Roots in the 'community of enquiry' approach envisioned by John Dewy It’s a extensions of the 'teacher as facilitator' concept and Eric Mazer’s work on peer instruction. Alison King in "From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side” College Teaching, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 30–35. J. Wesley Baker in "The Classroom Flip: using Web Course Management Tools to Become the Guide by the Side”

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

How does it work?

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

In How People Learn, J Bransford et al state that to develop competence in a subject students must…

Slide 10

Slide 10 text

In How People Learn, J Bransford et al state that to develop competence in a subject students must… 1. Have a deep foundation of factual knowledge in the topic.  

Slide 11

Slide 11 text

In How People Learn, J Bransford et al state that to develop competence in a subject students must… 1. Have a deep foundation of factual knowledge in the topic.   2. Understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework.

Slide 12

Slide 12 text

In How People Learn, J Bransford et al state that to develop competence in a subject students must… 1. Have a deep foundation of factual knowledge in the topic.   2. Understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework. 3. Organize knowledge in ways that facilitate retrieval and application.

Slide 13

Slide 13 text

Does it work?

Slide 14

Slide 14 text

Quick answer is yes….

Slide 15

Slide 15 text

Quick answer is yes…. 10 – 15 Key Studies in FE/HE Since 2000’s.

Slide 16

Slide 16 text

Quick answer is yes…. 10 – 15 Key Studies in FE/HE Since 2000’s. On average grades in all studies we +2 standard deviations higher.

Slide 17

Slide 17 text

My Experience

Slide 18

Slide 18 text

How to Flip…

Slide 19

Slide 19 text

How to Flip… 1. Provide an opportunity for students to gain first exposure prior to class.

Slide 20

Slide 20 text

How to Flip… 1. Provide an opportunity for students to gain first exposure prior to class. 2. Provide an incentive for students to prepare for class.

Slide 21

Slide 21 text

How to Flip… 1. Provide an opportunity for students to gain first exposure prior to class. 2. Provide an incentive for students to prepare for class. 3. Provide a mechanism to assess student understanding.

Slide 22

Slide 22 text

How to Flip… 1. Provide an opportunity for students to gain first exposure prior to class. 2. Provide an incentive for students to prepare for class. 3. Provide a mechanism to assess student understanding. 4. Provide in-class activities that focus on higher level cognitive activities.

Slide 23

Slide 23 text

Challenges

Slide 24

Slide 24 text

Challenges 1. Design.

Slide 25

Slide 25 text

Challenges 1. Design. 2. Preparation.

Slide 26

Slide 26 text

Challenges 1. Design. 2. Preparation. 3. Embedding.

Slide 27

Slide 27 text

References:   Berrett D (2012). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional l The Chronicle of Higher Education, Feb. 19, 2012.   Anderson LW and Krathwohl D (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, an assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New Longman.   Bransford JD, Brown AL, and Cocking RR (2000). How people learn: Brain, min experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.   Crouch CH and Mazur E (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience an American Journal of Physics 69: 970-977.   DesLauriers L, Schelew E, and Wieman C (2011). Improved learning in a large- enrollment physics class. Science 332: 862-864.   Fitzpatrick M (2012). Classroom lectures go digital. The New York Times, Jun   Hake R (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-t student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66: 64-74.   Lage MJ, Platt GJ, and Treglia M (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Educ 30-43.   Mazur E (2009). Farewell, Lecture? Science 323: 50-51.   Novak G, Patterson ET, Gavrin AD, and Christian W (1999). Just-in-Time Teach Blending Active Learning with Web Technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pren   Pashler H, McDaniel M, Rohrer D, and Bjork R (2008). Learning styles: Concepts evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9: 103-119.   Walvoord BE, and Anderson VJ (1998). Effective grading: A tool for learning a assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Slide 28

Slide 28 text

Image Credits: @  Tina  Chew  Lim   @  Kris1na  Alexanderson   @  Lee  Nineteen68   @  Savannah  Smith