Slide 19
Slide 19 text
CoreOS etcd
Pros und Cons etcd
© msg | Good for Karma: Configuration at Runtime | Alexander Schwartz | JFall Ede | 5. November 2015 21
Pro:
• Easy to access (REST), simple installation (Go-Binary), transport security (SSL)
• Changes are published immediately to all clients
• Generic structure for flexible usage
Contra:
• No access controls on a client level
• Young open source project
Add-ons and alternatives:
• Vulcan (HTTP Load Balancer, stores its configuration in etcd)
• SkyDNS (service discovery via DNS, stores its information in etcd)
• Apache Zookeeper (central configuration store and synchronization)
• Hazelcast (leader election, distributed locks, topics, in-memory-data-grid)
• Netflix Eureka (service discovery)
• Hashicorp Consul (service discovery and configuration store)