Slide 21
Slide 21 text
Konstantinos Xifaras
Conclusion :
- Medium Production (28th out of 46 in that season)
- Very low Quality (40th out of 46 in that season)
- Low Performance (33rd out of 46 in that season)
- Over-Rotation (8 out of 10 players) - Δ(Days) Rotation = 10.84. Unnecessary Over-Rotation (next match against Atromitos in 5
days and the next 2 matches against Panionios & Lamia). Over-Rotated the team on the previous match against Xanthi. 5 easy
matches in the row for the appropriate rotation before the series of matches against Arsenal-PAOK-Arsenal.
- The medium Rhythm of the match (slowest of the 4 matches against Lamia) reduced the superior Quality of the players of
Olympiacos (the line-up of Olympiacos has 10 times more Value than Lamia’s Line-up)
+ The good performance of the Defenders or/and the inability of Lamia (1 shot only, from set play)
+ The small difficulty of the match (40th out of 46 in that season)
Although the negative parameters on the management of the match are important, the Δ(Value) is big. The 8 shots of Olympiacos is the
evidence of it’s superiority on such a poor Performance against an opponent with very low capabilities.
Win (0-1) seems like a fair result. The final result (Draw) had serious possibilities.
Since it was the 1st match (Cup), the result forced Olympiacos to a low Rotation on the next math against Lamia (3-2) just 8 days before
Arsenal-PAOK-Arsenal. The result forced Olympiacos to over-rotation against Panionios in order to balance it.
Result = Lost the cohesion of the team and Olympiacos was unable to follow the fast-rhythm of the Arsenal (20% less). Lost 0-1.
Lamia Olympiacos
Result 0 0
Performance 563.6 682.2
Δ (performance) % 21
Production 8.7 9.9
Quality 65.1 68.7
Rhythm of the match (9.3) medium
Δ(Days of rest) Team 3
Δ(Days) Players Average 13.84
Δ (Days) Rotation 10.84
Over-Rotation
Difficulty of the match (40 / 46) very easy