Slide 1

Slide 1 text

Reproducible Science Matteo Cantiello Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics University of California Santa Barbara Authorea scientific advisor

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

 Is Collaborative Science in the 3rd millennium

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

 Is Collaborative  Produces / collects large Datasets Science in the 3rd millennium

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

 Is Collaborative  Produces / collects large Datasets  Requires large Computations/complex Codes Science in the 3rd millennium

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

 High publication pressure Science in the 3rd millennium

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

“No research paper can ever be considered to be the final word, and the replication and corroboration of research results is key to the scientific process” http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/reproducibility/ Reproducibility is one pillar of the scientific method. It’s what distinguish science from subjective matters. Michael Kloran What about reproducibility?

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

Emerging Bad Practices  Tendency to publish only positive results  Lack of duplication of “established” results  Increase number of retractions (misconduct?)  Clear cases of scientific misconducts  Clear cases of scientific frauds

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

Data: Fanelli, D. (2010) Positive results in psychology [...] dominate most journals, which strive to present new, exciting research. Meanwhile, attempts to replicate those studies, especially when the findings are negative, go unpublished [...]“ There are some experiments that everyone knows don't replicate, but this knowledge doesn't get into the literature,” The publication barrier can be chilling: “I've seen students spending their entire PhD period trying to replicate a phenomenon, failing, and quitting academia because they had nothing to show for their time.” Ed Yong, Nature 485, 7398 ” “

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

Drivers / Players?  Publication Pressure  Role of journals / media  Peer review system  Dissemination format of scientific results not allowing full reproducibility

Slide 10

Slide 10 text

“Central to this initiative is a checklist intended to prompt authors to disclose technical and statistical information in their submissions [...] To further increase transparency, we will encourage authors to provide tables of the data behind graphs and figures” http://www.nature.com/news/announcement-reducing-our-irreproducibility-1.12852 Nature, 2013 Reducing our Irreproducibility

Slide 11

Slide 11 text

Is a fundamental problem not being tackled?

Slide 12

Slide 12 text

written up on 20th century tools packaged in a 17th century format Scientists produce 21st century research

Slide 13

Slide 13 text

Back to the founding fathers (of the scientific method) Galileo Galilei 1564-1642

Slide 14

Slide 14 text

1610

Slide 15

Slide 15 text

2014

Slide 16

Slide 16 text

The scientific paper is a package that represents the ‘de-facto’ currency of scientific research

Slide 17

Slide 17 text

Au thorea ... Demo