Slide 1

Slide 1 text

User-Centered Visualization

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

I’m Lane (@laneharrison — postdoc)

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

No content

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

No content

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

valt.cs.tufts.edu

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

User-Centered? What does it mean to be

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

User What does it mean to be

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

Perceptual
 Ability

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

Perceptual
 Ability Cognitive
 State

Slide 10

Slide 10 text

Perceptual
 Ability Cognitive
 State Cognitive
 Ability

Slide 11

Slide 11 text

3 user-parts 3 experiments

Slide 12

Slide 12 text

1. Leveraging Perception 2. Influencing the User 3. Individual Differences

Slide 13

Slide 13 text

Leveraging perception

Slide 14

Slide 14 text

A brief history of vis (research)

Slide 15

Slide 15 text

1990: VIS is formed

Slide 16

Slide 16 text

1990-2000: The Techniques Era

Slide 17

Slide 17 text

No content

Slide 18

Slide 18 text

No content

Slide 19

Slide 19 text

2000-2010: The Techniques Era, part 2

Slide 20

Slide 20 text

No content

Slide 21

Slide 21 text

No content

Slide 22

Slide 22 text

With 20 years of techniques,
 how do we choose between them?

Slide 23

Slide 23 text

“How do I know when to bin a scatterplot?”

Slide 24

Slide 24 text

No content

Slide 25

Slide 25 text

No content

Slide 26

Slide 26 text

No content

Slide 27

Slide 27 text

No content

Slide 28

Slide 28 text

just-noticeable difference (jnd)

Slide 29

Slide 29 text

imagine yourself in a dark room…

Slide 30

Slide 30 text

No content

Slide 31

Slide 31 text

No content

Slide 32

Slide 32 text

No content

Slide 33

Slide 33 text

No content

Slide 34

Slide 34 text

But you don’t have to take my word for it

Slide 35

Slide 35 text

No content

Slide 36

Slide 36 text

@jnd1er

Slide 37

Slide 37 text

In the field of psychophysics, that branch of experimental psychology that studies sensation and perception, a jnd is the amount that something must be changed for the difference to be noticeable, defined to mean that the change is detectable half the time. My goal is to make a noticeable difference -- many jnds worth -- in human-centered technology. I started my career as an experimental/mathematical psychologist in psychophysics, and my love of the exquisite sensitivity and dynamic range of hearing and seeing, as well as the power of human perception has stayed with me. - Don Norman (@jnd1er)

Slide 38

Slide 38 text

back to scatterplots

Slide 39

Slide 39 text

after hours of torturing psych students…

Slide 40

Slide 40 text

0. 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ;ĂͿƐĐĂƩĞƌƉůŽƚ͕ZĞŶƐŝŶŬ r 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ භ from above from below JND Rensink plotted JND as a function of correlation (r)

Slide 41

Slide 41 text

The lower the r, 
 the higher the jnd

Slide 42

Slide 42 text

0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ;ĂͿƐĐĂƩĞƌƉůŽƚ͕ZĞŶƐŝŶŬ r 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ භ from above from below JND To see a difference in data with correlation of 0.3, the comparison r must be +/- 0.2.

Slide 43

Slide 43 text

increase to 0.5! To see a diff,

Slide 44

Slide 44 text

decrease to 0.2! To see a diff,

Slide 45

Slide 45 text

Rensink’s insight…

Slide 46

Slide 46 text

;ďͿƐĐĂƩĞƌƉůŽƚ r 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ;ĐͿƐĐĂƩĞƌƉůŽƚƌĞŐƌĞƐƐŝŽŶ rA 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ 0.0 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 This trend is roughly linear! 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ;ĂͿƐĐĂƩĞƌƉůŽƚ͕ZĞŶƐŝŶŬ r 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ භ from above from below JND

Slide 47

Slide 47 text

No content

Slide 48

Slide 48 text

r=1.0 r=0.0

Slide 49

Slide 49 text

Weber’s Law dp = k * d(r) r __

Slide 50

Slide 50 text

E. H. Weber

Slide 51

Slide 51 text

Lane’s insight…

Slide 52

Slide 52 text

;ďͿƐĐĂƩĞƌƉůŽƚ r 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ;ĐͿƐĐĂƩĞƌƉůŽƚƌĞŐƌĞƐƐŝŽŶ rA 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ 0.0 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ;ĂͿƐĐĂƩĞƌƉůŽƚ͕ZĞŶƐŝŶŬ r 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ භ from above from below JND If scatterplots follow Weber’s law like this…

Slide 53

Slide 53 text

;ďͿƐĐĂƩĞƌƉůŽƚ r 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ;ĐͿƐĐĂƩĞƌƉůŽƚƌĞŐƌĞƐƐŝŽŶ rA 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ 0.0 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ;ĂͿƐĐĂƩĞƌƉůŽƚ͕ZĞŶƐŝŶŬ r 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ ƽ භ from above from below JND What if different charts follow Weber’s law differently?

Slide 54

Slide 54 text

No content

Slide 55

Slide 55 text

r = -1 r = -0.8 r = -0.3 r = 0.3 r = 0.8 r = 1 scatterplot parallel coordinates (pcp) stackedarea r = -1 r = -0.8 r = -0.3 r = 0.3 r = 0.8 r = 1 scatterplot parallel coordinates (pcp) stackedarea

Slide 56

Slide 56 text

coordinates (pcp) stackedarea stackedline stackedbar r = -1 r = -0.8 r = -0.3 r = 0.3 r = 0.8 r = 1 scatterplot parallel coordinates (pcp) stackedarea

Slide 57

Slide 57 text

stackedbar donut radar line r = -1 r = -0.8 r = -0.3 r = 0.3 r = 0.8 r = 1 scatterplot parallel coordinates (pcp) stackedarea

Slide 58

Slide 58 text

radar line ordered line r = -1 r = -0.8 r = -0.3 r = 0.3 r = 0.8 r = 1 scatterplot parallel coordinates (pcp) stackedarea

Slide 59

Slide 59 text

How can we test all these visualizations?

Slide 60

Slide 60 text

A: Crowdsourcing

Slide 61

Slide 61 text

n=1687 on AMT (Amazon’s Mechanical Turk)

Slide 62

Slide 62 text

Results

Slide 63

Slide 63 text

scatterplot − positive r 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● scatterplot − negative r jnd 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● parallel coordinates − positive r jnd 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● parallel coordinates − negative r jnd 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● stackedarea − positive r jnd 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● stackedline − positive r 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● stackedline − negative r jnd 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● stackedbar − positive r jnd 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● stackedbar − negative r jnd 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● donut − positive r jnd 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● line − positive 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● line − negative jnd 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● radar − positive jnd 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ● ● ● ● radar − negative jnd 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ordered line − positive jnd 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Lots of Plots

Slide 64

Slide 64 text

No content

Slide 65

Slide 65 text

All follow 
 Weber’s Law!

Slide 66

Slide 66 text

Findings

Slide 67

Slide 67 text

Not all perceptual spaces are symmetric.

Slide 68

Slide 68 text

0.7 0.8 0.85 scatterplot (positive) scatterplot (negative) parallel coordinates (negative) parallel coordinates (positive) Symmetric Not Symmetric

Slide 69

Slide 69 text

sp and pcp 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 parallelCoordinates scatterplot positive negative -PCP as good as scatterplots +PCP terrible

Slide 70

Slide 70 text

To show correlations accurately in parallel coordinates plots, flip the axes to show as many negative correlations as possible. Design guideline: scatterplot (positive) scatterplot (negative) parallel coordinates (negative) parallel coordinates (positive) scatterplot (positive) scatterplot (negative) parallel coordinates (negative)

Slide 71

Slide 71 text

Which stacked-variant 
 wins?

Slide 72

Slide 72 text

stackedarea, stackedline and stackedbar 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 stackedline stackedarea stackedbar positive negative parallel coordinates (pcp) stackedarea stackedline scatterplot parallel coordinates (pcp) stackedarea stackedline stackedbar donut radar line

Slide 73

Slide 73 text

stackedarea, stackedline and stackedbar 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 stackedline stackedarea stackedbar positive negative parallel coordinates (pcp) stackedarea stackedline scatterplot parallel coordinates (pcp) stackedarea stackedline stackedbar donut radar line More detail More abstract

Slide 74

Slide 74 text

Design guideline: Less isn’t always more. Sometimes less “minimal” charts also yield less ambiguity.

Slide 75

Slide 75 text

Radar versus Line?

Slide 76

Slide 76 text

line and radar 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 line radar positive negative

Slide 77

Slide 77 text

line and radar 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 line radar positive negative Longer line Shorter line

Slide 78

Slide 78 text

Design guideline: If you have to use a line chart, make sure it’s wide enough.

Slide 79

Slide 79 text

Perceptually-backed ranking of accuracy

Slide 80

Slide 80 text

model fit results 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ordered line line radar stackedline stackedarea stackedbar donut scatterplot parallel coordinates scatterplot, Rensink positive negative JND rA Take the models, obtain rankings at each |r|

Slide 81

Slide 81 text

No content

Slide 82

Slide 82 text

The paper: “Ranking Visualizations of Correlation Using Weber's Law.” Lane Harrison, Fumeng Yang, Steven Franconeri, Remco Chang . To appear, InfoVIS 2014 (pdf online)

Slide 83

Slide 83 text

(I still don’t know when to bin a scatterplot)

Slide 84

Slide 84 text

Influencing The User

Slide 85

Slide 85 text

Make Decisions Reason Perceive D A T A

Slide 86

Slide 86 text

Make Decisions Reason Perceive D A T A Visualization is also used in more serious contexts:

Slide 87

Slide 87 text

What do we know about affect?

Slide 88

Slide 88 text

Affect influences creativity. Affect alters how we decide under uncertainty. Affect modulates visual perception. (Lewis et al., 2011) (Fredrickson, et al., 2005) (Vuilleumier et al., 2007)

Slide 89

Slide 89 text

How does Emotion impact graphical perception?

Slide 90

Slide 90 text

leverage well- studied graphical perception task adapt well-studied emotion-priming techniques Experiment combining emotion and graphical perception. Let`s start with what we know...

Slide 91

Slide 91 text

Position Angle > (Cleveland & McGill,1984) a. Which of the two is larger? b. What percentage is the smaller of the larger?

Slide 92

Slide 92 text

Cleveland & McGill's Results 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 Log Error Crowdsourced Results T1 T2 Useful for visualization design guidelines; heavily replicated. (image: Heer and Bostock, 2009)

Slide 93

Slide 93 text

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 T5 Log Error Crowdsourced Results 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 Log Error (image: Heer and Bostock, 2009) Validated AMT for graphical perception studies. Heer & Bostock, 2009

Slide 94

Slide 94 text

A B 100 0 A B 100 0 A B 100 0 A B A B tree A B A B 100 0 A B V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 bar chart (adjacent comparison) bar chart (non-adjacent comparison) horizontal bar chart (adjacent comparison) stacked bar chart (adjacent comparison) pie chart (ordered) pie chart (unordered) bubble chart treemap

Slide 95

Slide 95 text

A B 100 0 A B 100 0 A B 100 0 A B A B tree A B A B 100 0 A B V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 bar chart (adjacent comparison) bar chart (non-adjacent comparison) horizontal bar chart (adjacent comparison) stacked bar chart (adjacent comparison) pie chart (ordered) pie chart (unordered) bubble chart treemap Replicate Cleveland & McGill! Again!

Slide 96

Slide 96 text

leverage well- studied graphical perception task adapt well-studied emotion-priming techniques Experiment combining emotion and graphical perception.

Slide 97

Slide 97 text

How do we induce Emotion? Stories Visual memory != verbal memory Commonly used in web- based studies. (Goeritz., 2007) (Shackman et al., 2006)

Slide 98

Slide 98 text

How do we induce Emotion? Stories Visual memory != verbal memory Commonly used in web- based studies. (Goeritz., 2007) (Shackman et al., 2006) An excerpt...

Slide 99

Slide 99 text

No one could say for sure how long she would live, but continued hospital care was clearly pointless. Nor could she go home: she needed more attention than her family could provide... The problem was, she had no place to go. There was a hospice facility near her house, but it would accept her only if she would die within six days... - Excerpt from Looking for a Place to Die, Theresa Brown

Slide 100

Slide 100 text

How do we quantify Emotion? How do we induce Emotion? Stories Visual memory != verbal memory Commonly used in web- based studies. (Goeritz., 2007) (Shackman et al., 2006) (Lang et al., 2008, Lewis et al., 2011) 9-point 
 Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM)

Slide 101

Slide 101 text

Pilot 2: how effective is the priming? Pilot 1: is the stimuli valid? Full-study: all 8 chart types Study components:

Slide 102

Slide 102 text

Full-study: 8 chart types Purpose: test whether affect influences graphical perception. Design: 
 - n = 963 on Mechanical Turk
 - 1 random prime, 1 random chart
 - 5 perception tasks per participant
 - between subjects

Slide 103

Slide 103 text

Experiment procedure (Full study & Pilot 2) Pre-Valence Pre-Arousal Post-Valence Post-Arousal Accuracy Verification Question Measure Emotion Random Priming The patient was a fairly young woman and she'd had cancer for as long as her youngest child had been alive... During this past year I've had three instances of car trouble: a blowout on a freeway, a bunch of blown fuses and an out-of-gas situation... A B 100 0 A B 100 0 A B 100 0 A B A B tree A B A B 100 0 A B Random Chart V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 Tasks Which of the two (A or B) is SMALLER? What percentage is the SMALLER of the LARGER? Measure Emotion

Slide 104

Slide 104 text

Full-study: 8 chart types Cleanup: 
 - 299 removed for junk answers
 - n = 664 total...
 - n = 207 successfully primed

Slide 105

Slide 105 text

Full-study: 8 chart types Cleanup: 
 - 299 removed for junk answers
 - n = 664 total...
 - n = 207 successfully primed Two cases: by priming group (664) and by SAM-change (207)...

Slide 106

Slide 106 text

Mean of all participants, regardless of final SAM (n = 664): 0 1 2 3 4 Positively Primed Negatively Primed Means of All Participants No significant difference in error: 
 t(662) = 1.8318; p = .067

Slide 107

Slide 107 text

All participants, regardless of final SAM (n = 664): A B 100 0 A B 100 0 A B 100 0 A B A B tree A B A B 100 0 A B V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 0 1 2 3 4 Positively Primed Negatively Primed

Slide 108

Slide 108 text

Means of primed participants (n = 207): 0 1 2 3 4 Positively Primed Negatively Primed Means of Primed Participants Significant difference in error: 
 t(205) = 3.1560; p = .0018

Slide 109

Slide 109 text

Primed participants (n = 207): A B 100 0 A B 100 0 A B 100 0 A B A B tree A B A B 100 0 A B V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 0 1 2 3 4 Positively Primed Negatively Primed

Slide 110

Slide 110 text

Expert Discussion: 
 Steven Franconeri, Northwestern Positive moods can expand the scope of the perceptual spotlight of attention. Encourage an observer to process a larger spatial area of the world in a single glance. Negative or anxious moods can constrict this spatial area. (Eriksen & St. James, 1986) (Gasper & Clore, 2002; Rowe et al., 2007) (Eysenck & Calvo, 1992) To summarize...

Slide 111

Slide 111 text

Emotion plays an important role in visualization. Emotion influences graphical perception accuracy.

Slide 112

Slide 112 text

Design guideline: When designing for stressful situations, put important information close together.

Slide 113

Slide 113 text

The paper: “Influencing Visual Judgment through Affective Priming.” Lane Harrison, Drew Skau, Steven Franconeri, 
 Aidong Lu, Remco Chang. ACM CHI 2013, (pdf online)

Slide 114

Slide 114 text

Individual Differences

Slide 115

Slide 115 text

Bayesian Reasoning The probability that a woman over age 40 has breast cancer is 1%. However, the probability that mammography accurately detects the disease is 80% with a false positive rate of 9.6%. If a 40-year old woman tests positive in a mammography exam, what is the probability that she indeed has breast cancer?

Slide 116

Slide 116 text

Answer Bayes’ theorem states that P(A|B) = P(B|A) * P(A) / P(B). In this case, A is having breast cancer, B is testing positive with mammography. P(A|B) is the probability of a person having breast cancer given that the person is tested positive with mammography. P(B|A) is given as 80%, or 0.8, P(A) is given as 1%, or 0.01. P(B) is not explicitly stated, but can be computed as P(B,A)+P(B,˜A), or the probability of testing positive and the patient having cancer plus the probability of testing positive and the patient not having cancer. Since P(B,A) is equal 0.8*0.01 = 0.008, and P(B,˜A) is 0.093 * (1-0.01) = 0.09207, P(B) can be computed as 0.008+0.09207 = 0.1007. Finally, P(A|B) is therefore 0.8 * 0.01 / 0.1007, which is equal to 0.07944.

Slide 117

Slide 117 text

Visual aids don’t help.

Slide 118

Slide 118 text

No content

Slide 119

Slide 119 text

What we tested…

Slide 120

Slide 120 text

No content

Slide 121

Slide 121 text

Original “Full” Structured

Slide 122

Slide 122 text

“full” text

Slide 123

Slide 123 text

structured text

Slide 124

Slide 124 text

No content

Slide 125

Slide 125 text

Storyboarding

Slide 126

Slide 126 text

No content

Slide 127

Slide 127 text

No content

Slide 128

Slide 128 text

No content

Slide 129

Slide 129 text

n=377 on AMT

Slide 130

Slide 130 text

Results

Slide 131

Slide 131 text

Overall Accuracy

Slide 132

Slide 132 text

But we also tested…

Slide 133

Slide 133 text

1. Numeracy 2. Locus of Control 3. Spatial Ability

Slide 134

Slide 134 text

1. Numeracy 2. Locus of Control 3. Spatial Ability

Slide 135

Slide 135 text

No content

Slide 136

Slide 136 text

Split on Spatial Ability

Slide 137

Slide 137 text

Design Guideline: Pay attention to VIS research. Individual differences matter, but we’re still figuring it out!

Slide 138

Slide 138 text

No content

Slide 139

Slide 139 text

User- Centered? What does it mean to be

Slide 140

Slide 140 text

Perceptual
 Ability

Slide 141

Slide 141 text

Perceptual
 Ability Cognitive
 State

Slide 142

Slide 142 text

Perceptual
 Ability Cognitive
 State Cognitive
 Ability

Slide 143

Slide 143 text

Perceptual
 Ability Cognitive
 State Cognitive
 Ability User-Centered Visualization

Slide 144

Slide 144 text

What becomes possible?

Slide 145

Slide 145 text

Big 
 Data small computer

Slide 146

Slide 146 text

Big 
 Data small computer Can we halt computation when differences are imperceptible? Perceptual
 Ability

Slide 147

Slide 147 text

Big 
 Data small computer Can we influence the user to analyze more optimally? Cognitive
 State

Slide 148

Slide 148 text

Big 
 Data small computer Can we adapt to user abilities? Cognitive
 Ability

Slide 149

Slide 149 text

Perceptual
 Ability Cognitive
 State Cognitive
 Ability User-Centered Visualization