Slide 1

Slide 1 text

Bayesian modeling of gravitational microlensing events 2nd Year PhD Assessment Talks Fran Bartolić University of St Andrews fbartolic

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

2 What is gravitational microlensing? Source ● Star(s) Lens ● Star(s) ● Star + planet ● Black hole ● Brown Dwarf Observer ● Photometry using a network of ground based telescopes ● Space telescopes

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

Credit: Y. Tsapras

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

Credit: A. Udalski

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

5 Why are people interested in microlensing? Credit: Matthew Penny Distance from star [AU] Planet mass [Earth masses]

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

6 What does the data look like?

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

7 The inverse problem

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

8 The inverse problem Model parameters Data Posterior Likelihood Prior

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

9 What problems am I trying to solve? Mróz et. al. 2016 Correlated noise in the data Mróz et. al. 2019 Dominik et. al. 2019 Highly correlated non-linear parameter space Population inference

Slide 10

Slide 10 text

10 What problems am I trying to solve? Mróz et. al. 2016 Correlated noise in the data Mróz et. al. 2019 Dominik et. al. 2019 Highly correlated non-linear parameter space Population inference

Slide 11

Slide 11 text

11 What problems am I trying to solve? Mróz et. al. 2016 Correlated noise in the data Mróz et. al. 2019 Dominik et. al. 2019 Highly correlated non-linear parameter space Population inference

Slide 12

Slide 12 text

12 The inverse problem Posterior Likelihood Prior

Slide 13

Slide 13 text

13 A generative model for the data + = Observed data Deterministic physical model Probabilistic noise model

Slide 14

Slide 14 text

14 A deterministic forward model Trajectory Magnification Flux

Slide 15

Slide 15 text

15 A probabilistic noise model Deterministic physical model Probabilistic noise model Multivariate Gaussian White noise Correlated noise Covariance matrix

Slide 16

Slide 16 text

16 The inverse problem Posterior Likelihood Prior How to efficiently sample the posterior?

Slide 17

Slide 17 text

17 Sampling the posterior with MCMC ● Metropolis Hastings MCMC is inefficient at exploring complex posteriors ● It doesn’t scale to more than ~20 dimensions (parameters) ● Often fails silently Metropolis Hastings Credit: https://github.com/chi-feng/mcmc-demo Posterior

Slide 18

Slide 18 text

18 Sampling the posterior with Hamiltonian MCMC Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Credit: https://github.com/chi-feng/mcmc-demo Potential energy Hamiltonian Hamilton’s equations Posterior

Slide 19

Slide 19 text

19 Example results Data space Parameter space

Slide 20

Slide 20 text

20 Example results Covariance matrix

Slide 21

Slide 21 text

21 Take home messages ● Microlensing enables discovery of cold exoplanets and objects such as Brown Dwarfs and Black Holes ● Fitting models is hard because the physics of interest maps poorly onto the observed data ● Correlated noise matters ● Hamiltonian Monte Carlo efficiently samples posteriors using information about the geometry of the posterior probability density