The need for a new paradigm Eric Calais, Ecole normale supérieure, Paris, France Contribu6ons from T. Craig (ENS), T. Camelbeeck (ROB), S. Stein (NWU), M. Liu (U. Missouri), A. Friedrich (LMU), L. Fleitout (ENS)
6me, un6l their fric6onal strength is exceeded – at which point they rupture in an earthquake with a stress drop. • Once unloaded by the earthquake, it takes a variable amount of 6me for the fault to be reloaded to the point of rupture. • But eventually the fault will rupture again and the cycle will repeat, regularly or irregularly. • Over several such “cycles”, a balance is achieved between the rates at which strain accrues and is released on faults. • Paleoseismic “slip rates” (= strain release rates) agree with geode6c “slip rates” (= strain accumula6on rates). • As a corollary, past earthquakes, strain accrual, and fault segmenta6on have some (complex) predic6ve power for future events. “Earthquakes occur as a result of global plate mo6on” (Kanamori and Brodsky, Rep. Prog. Phys., 2004) with variable strength, loading rate, and stress drop
Paleoseismology = 1.7+-‐0.5 mm/yr over past 10 Ka (Friedrich et al., 2003) GPS = 1.6+-‐0.4 mm/yr (Chang et al. JGR 2006) Pechmann and Arabasz, 1995 Stein et al., 2005 2.0 3.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 10-4 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 MAGNITUDE EARTHQUAKES PER YEAR Wasatch Front Paleoseismology GPS, seismicity, paleoseismology consistent with one M7 per ~1000 yr => slow, steady-state system, loaded by far-field motions
16 December 1811, M7.0, Codonwood? Reelfoot? • 23 January 1812, M7.0, S. Illinois? • 7 February 1812, M7.5, SW-‐dipping Reelfoot thrust • Current seismicity = ajershocks? The New Madrid Earthquake Sequence Na6onal Seismic Hazard Map, USGS CEUS PGA 10%/50 years, 2008 100˚W 95˚W 90˚W 85˚W 80˚W 75˚W 70˚W 25˚N 30˚N 35˚N 40˚N 45˚N 50˚N 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0 500 km 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 R o c k P G A g CEUS PGA 10%/50 years, 2008 http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/products/conterminous/2008/maps/ • PSHA => up to 0.3 g for 10%/50 years. • The occurrence of similar earthquakes today would cons6tute a significant hazard. • Reducing vulnerability is costly.
over 200 km) Craig and Calais, JGR 2014 0.5 mm/yr Mean residuals and confidence limits in the NMSZ as a func6on of observa6on period dura6on (11 best sites). Dark grey bars = 1-‐sigma uncertainty interval, light grey bars = 95% uncertainty interval.
200 A.D. 1811-‐1812 Mapping and da6ng of paléo-‐liquefac6on features => ~500 year average recurrence over past 2,000 years. Tudle et al. (2002) New Madrid paleoseismology
~2,000 yr seismicity rate ⇒ Earthquakes are releasing elas6c energy stored in the crust over > 2,000 yr – “strain reservoir” GPS (upper bound) From Calais et al., Science, 2009 Adapted from Newman et al., Science, 1999 strain rate accumula6on Evidence for non-‐steady state behavior 500 yr average repeat 6me over ~2,000 yr => 2 mm/yr for low M7 0.2 mm/yr => minimum repeat 6me ~5,000 years for low M7