<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/feed.rss.xml" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Resolution Foundation</title>
    <description/>
    <link>https://speakerdeck.com/resolutionfoundation</link>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://speakerdeck.com/resolutionfoundation.rss"/>
    <lastBuildDate>2026-10-15 06:56:47 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>A new deal for disabled people</title>
      <description>Disability support and especially Personal Independence Payments (PIP) is failing on two grounds – spiralling costs are putting pressure on the public finances and those that need the benefit have lost faith in the system. But while there is widespread support for reform, that is where the consensus ends – with politicians tending to focus on the potential savings, rather than how a new system could better enable millions of disabled people to flourish. Getting this right is crucial for any reforms to be sustainable.

What types of additional costs do disabled people face, and how does this vary by condition or age? How can disability benefits respond to the sheer breadth of these costs and conditions, and how can it be better matched to people’s actual needs? Who might receive more, or less, under a reformed disability benefit system ? And can reform deliver the savings that politicians are keen to see?</description>
      <media:content url="https://files.speakerdeck.com/presentations/271487e70d3346c78176e744ed77d3ef/preview_slide_0.jpg?40923634" type="image/jpeg" medium="image"/>
      <content:encoded>Disability support and especially Personal Independence Payments (PIP) is failing on two grounds – spiralling costs are putting pressure on the public finances and those that need the benefit have lost faith in the system. But while there is widespread support for reform, that is where the consensus ends – with politicians tending to focus on the potential savings, rather than how a new system could better enable millions of disabled people to flourish. Getting this right is crucial for any reforms to be sustainable.

What types of additional costs do disabled people face, and how does this vary by condition or age? How can disability benefits respond to the sheer breadth of these costs and conditions, and how can it be better matched to people’s actual needs? Who might receive more, or less, under a reformed disability benefit system ? And can reform deliver the savings that politicians are keen to see?</content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>https://speakerdeck.com/resolutionfoundation/a-new-deal-for-disabled-people</link>
      <guid>https://speakerdeck.com/resolutionfoundation/a-new-deal-for-disabled-people</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
