Slide 16
Slide 16 text
REIMAGINING THE SOCIAL SAFETY NET
Imagine a United States where social
service systems and basic needs
programs—those that offer housing,
food, healthcare, childcare,
and income support—are not
fragmented safety nets, but
intentional infrastructure for long-term opportunity
towards two-generation economic mobility. A nation
where all families receive unconditional support every
step of the way, and where staff feel empowered and
equipped to channel the passion that brought them
to public service into truly uplifting the families they
serve. This is not just possible, it is necessary.
This transformation begins by recognizing basic needs
not as temporary aid, but as critical and vital public,
economic infrastructure, just as essential to family
thriving as any job training or education program:
Stable housing drives educational outcomes10.
Affordable childcare opens doors to higher education
and better jobs11. Cash support reduces toxic stress,
improves health outcomes, and empowers families to
focus on long-term planning.12 Together, they provide
the stability that makes family economic
mobility possible.13
Yet, even the best policies fail when
systems are hard to access or
perpetuate stigma. Administrative
burdens and rigid eligibility rules
create unnecessary barriers for
families, while disempowering the
caseworkers and staff who want to
help them succeed.14 Bureaucratic
complexities, fear of consequences,
general distrust, eligibility and language
10 Brennan, M., Reed, P., & Sturtevant, L. A. (2014, November). The impacts of affordable housing on education: A research summary. Center for Housing Policy.
11 Reichlin Cruse, L., Holtzman, T., Gault, B., Croom, D., & Polk, P. (2019, April 11). Parents in college by the numbers. Institute for Women’s Policy Research & Ascend
at the Aspen Institute.
12 Chao, B., Heneghan, M., Hashash, S., DeFabio, C., Prophete, C., & Roy, V. (2025). The resilience factor: Cash as a tool towards better health for young families.
Economic Security Project.
13 Bogle, M., Acs, G., Loprest, P. J., Mikelson, K., & Popkin, S. J. (2016). Building blocks and strategies for helping Americans move out of poverty. US Partnership on
Mobility from Poverty. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
14 Moynihan, D., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative Burden: Learning, Psychological, and Compliance Costs in Citizen-State Interactions. Journal of Public
Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 25(1), 43–69.
15 Lacarte, V. (2024, October). Explainer: Immigrants and the use of public benefits in the United States. Migration Policy Institute.
16 Gonzalez, D., Bernstein, H., Karpman, M., & Kenney, G. M. (2024, August). Mixed-status families and immigrant families with children continued avoiding safety-net
programs in 2023. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
17 Anderson, T., Coffey, A., Daly, H., Hahn, H., Maag, E., & Werner, K. (2022, January). Balancing at the edge of the cliff: Experiences and calculations of benefit cliffs,
plateaus, and trade-offs. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
18 Jackson-Spieker, K. & Barrows, A. (2024, January). Experts by Experience: How engaging people with lived experience can improve social services. Center for
Behavioral Design and Social Justice, Project Evident.
barriers deter immigrant families from accessing
public benefits15—with 1 in 6 avoiding them altogether
out of fear of immigration repercussions.16 That’s why
transformation must be both structural and cultural:
reimagining an inclusive public benefit system that
reflects the real lives, aspirations, and strengths of all
families.
This transformation means shifting from benefits
cliffs—where even a small rise in earnings leads to a
sudden loss of support—to creating gradual off-ramps
that promote stability instead of punishing progress.17
It means replacing dehumanizing language with
strengths-based, dignity-first language and expanding
what counts as evidence to include family feedback
and lived experience.18 It means expanding protections
and eligibility criteria, so all families can access support
safely and equitably.
Just as importantly, this transformation also requires
supporting frontline staff with the tools and agency to
build genuine relationships, not just enforce policies.
Through our technical assistance work, LIFT is in
partnership with staff across the country who are
deeply committed to improving the lives of families.
Across government, education, and healthcare, family-
driven strategies like economic mobility coaching
are being woven into the fabric of service delivery,
replacing compliance-driven models with those that
center care, autonomy, and trust.
At LIFT, our north star is
a system that operates
on hope, money, and
love. Our partnerships
prove this vision is
not only possible—
it’s happening.
16