Slide 1

Slide 1 text

Beyond Cognacy Historical Relations Between Words and Their Implication for Phylogenetic Reconstruction Johann-Mattis List DFG research fellow Centre des recherches linguistiques sur l’Asie Orientale Team Adaptation, Integration, Reticulation, Evolution EHESS and UPMC, Paris 2016/10/13 1 / 45

Slide 2

Slide 2 text

Background 2 / 45

Slide 3

Slide 3 text

Background 2 / 45

Slide 4

Slide 4 text

Background 2 / 45

Slide 5

Slide 5 text

Background 2 / 45

Slide 6

Slide 6 text

Background 2 / 45

Slide 7

Slide 7 text

Background 2 / 45

Slide 8

Slide 8 text

Background 2 / 45

Slide 9

Slide 9 text

Background 2 / 45

Slide 10

Slide 10 text

Background 2 / 45

Slide 11

Slide 11 text

Background 2 / 45

Slide 12

Slide 12 text

Background Background 3 / 45

Slide 13

Slide 13 text

Background Background 3 / 45

Slide 14

Slide 14 text

Background Background 3 / 45

Slide 15

Slide 15 text

Background Background 3 / 45

Slide 16

Slide 16 text

Background Background 3 / 45

Slide 17

Slide 17 text

Language History Language History 4 / 45

Slide 18

Slide 18 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Dendrophilia August Schleicher (1821-1868) 5 / 45

Slide 19

Slide 19 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Dendrophilia August Schleicher (1821-1868) “These assumptions, which follow logically from the results of our re- search, can be best illustrated by the image of a branching tree.” (Schle- icher 1853: 787) 5 / 45

Slide 20

Slide 20 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Dendrophilia Schleicher (1853) 6 / 45

Slide 21

Slide 21 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Dendrophobia Johannes Schmidt (1843-1901) 7 / 45

Slide 22

Slide 22 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Dendrophobia Johannes Schmidt (1843-1901) “You can turn it as you want, but as long as you stick to the idea that the his- torically attested languages have been developing by multiple furcations of an ancestral language, that is, as long as you assume that there is a Stammbaum [family tree] of the Indo-European lan- guages, you will never be able to explain all facts which have been assembled in a scientifically satisfying way.” (Schmidt 1872: 17, my translation) 7 / 45

Slide 23

Slide 23 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Dendrophobia Johannes Schmidt (1843-1901) “I want to replace [the tree] by the im- age of a wave that spreads out from the center in concentric circles be- coming weaker and weaker the far- ther they get away from the center.” (Schmidt 1872: 27, my translation) 8 / 45

Slide 24

Slide 24 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Dendrophobia Schmidt (1875) 9 / 45

Slide 25

Slide 25 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Dendrophobia Meillet (1908) Hirt (1905) Bloomfield (1933) Bonfante (1931) 9 / 45

Slide 26

Slide 26 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Phylogenetic Networks Trees are bad, because... 10 / 45

Slide 27

Slide 27 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Phylogenetic Networks Trees are bad, because... they are difficult to reconstruct............ 10 / 45

Slide 28

Slide 28 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Phylogenetic Networks Trees are bad, because... they are difficult to reconstruct............ languages do not always split............ .......... ............ ............ 10 / 45

Slide 29

Slide 29 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Phylogenetic Networks Trees are bad, because... they are difficult to reconstruct............ languages do not always split............ .......... ............ ............ they are boring, since they only model the vertical aspects of language history ............ 10 / 45

Slide 30

Slide 30 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Phylogenetic Networks Trees are bad, because... they are difficult to reconstruct............ languages do not always split............ .......... ............ ............ they are boring, since they only model the vertical aspects of language history ............ Waves are bad, because nobody knows how to reconstruct them 10 / 45

Slide 31

Slide 31 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Phylogenetic Networks Trees are bad, because... they are difficult to reconstruct............ languages do not always split............ .......... ............ ............ they are boring, since they only model the vertical aspects of language history ............ Waves are bad, because nobody knows how to reconstruct them languages still diverge, even if not necessarily in split processes 10 / 45

Slide 32

Slide 32 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Phylogenetic Networks Trees are bad, because... they are difficult to reconstruct............ languages do not always split............ .......... ............ ............ they are boring, since they only model the vertical aspects of language history ............ Waves are bad, because nobody knows how to reconstruct them languages still diverge, even if not necessarily in split processes they are boring, since they only model the horizontal aspects of language history 10 / 45

Slide 33

Slide 33 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Phylogenetic Networks Hugo Schuchardt (1842-1927) 11 / 45

Slide 34

Slide 34 text

Language History Modeling Language History Modeling Language History: Phylogenetic Networks Hugo Schuchardt (1842-1927) “We connect the branches and twigs of the tree with countless horizon- tal lines and it ceases to be a tree.” (Schuchardt 1870 [1900]: 11) 11 / 45

Slide 35

Slide 35 text

Language History Modeling Language History Phylogenetic Networks 12 / 45

Slide 36

Slide 36 text

Language History Modeling Language History Phylogenetic Networks 12 / 45

Slide 37

Slide 37 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change 'soh₂-wl̩- sh₂uˈen- SUN Indo-European 13 / 45

Slide 38

Slide 38 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change 'soh₂-wl̩- sh₂uˈen- SUN Indo-European soːwel- sunːoː- SUN Germanic 13 / 45

Slide 39

Slide 39 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change 'soh₂-wl̩- sh₂uˈen- SUN Indo-European soːwel- sunːoː- SUN Germanic zɔnə SUN German suːl SUN Swedish 13 / 45

Slide 40

Slide 40 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change 'soh₂-wl̩- sh₂uˈen- SUN Indo-European soːwel- sunːoː- SUN Germanic soːl- SUN Romance zɔnə SUN German suːl SUN Swedish 13 / 45

Slide 41

Slide 41 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change 'soh₂-wl̩- sh₂uˈen- SUN Indo-European soːwel- sunːoː- SUN Germanic soːl- SUN soːlikul- SMALL SUN Romance zɔnə SUN German suːl SUN Swedish 13 / 45

Slide 42

Slide 42 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change 'soh₂-wl̩- sh₂uˈen- SUN Indo-European soːwel- sunːoː- SUN Germanic soːl- SUN soːlikul- SMALL SUN Romance solej SUN French sol SUN Spanish zɔnə SUN German suːl SUN Swedish 13 / 45

Slide 43

Slide 43 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change 'soh₂-wl◌̩ - sh₂uˈen- SUN Indo-European soːwel- sunːoː- SUN Germanic soːl- SUN soːlikul- SMALL SUN Romance solej SUN French sol SUN Spanish zɔnə SUN German suːl SUN Swedish SEM ANTIC SHIFT M O RPH O LO G ICAL CH AN G E M O R PH O LO G ICA L CH A N G E MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGE MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGE 13 / 45

Slide 44

Slide 44 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change arbre 14 / 45

Slide 45

Slide 45 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change form "meaning" 14 / 45

Slide 46

Slide 46 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change arbre 14 / 45

Slide 47

Slide 47 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change 14 / 45

Slide 48

Slide 48 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change arbre MEANING FORM LANGUAGE 14 / 45

Slide 49

Slide 49 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change FORM LANGUAGE MEANING arbre 14 / 45

Slide 50

Slide 50 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change arbre MEANING FORM LANGUAGE MEANING FORM LANGUAGE 14 / 45

Slide 51

Slide 51 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change SEMANTIC CHANGE MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGE S T R A T IC C H A N G E Gévaudan (2007) 14 / 45

Slide 52

Slide 52 text

Language History Lexical Change Lexical Change kop Kopf Kopf köpfen World Cup Welt- ccup Old High German Standard German MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGE SEMANTIC CHANGE SEMANTIC CHANGE STRATIC CHANGE MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGE 14 / 45

Slide 53

Slide 53 text

Biological Approaches in Historical Linguistics Biological Approaches in Historical Linguistics 15 / 45

Slide 54

Slide 54 text

Biological Approaches in Historical Linguistics Keys to the Past Keys to the Past The Geological Evidences of The Antiquity of Man with Remarks on Theories of The Origin of Species by Variation By Sir Charles Lyell London John Murray, Albemarle Street 1863 16 / 45

Slide 55

Slide 55 text

Biological Approaches in Historical Linguistics Keys to the Past Keys to the Past If we new not- hing of the existence of Latin, - if all historical documents previous to the fin- teenth century had been lost, - if tra- dition even was si- lent as to the former existance of a Ro- man empire, a me- re comparison of the Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Wallachian, and Rhaetian dialects would enable us to say that at some time there must ha- ve been a language, from which these six modern dialects derive their origin in common. 16 / 45

Slide 56

Slide 56 text

Biological Approaches in Historical Linguistics Keys to the Past Keys to the Past: Uniformitarianism (C. Lyell) 17 / 45

Slide 57

Slide 57 text

Biological Approaches in Historical Linguistics Keys to the Past Keys to the Past: Uniformitarianism (C. Lyell) Uniformity of Change: Laws of change are uniform. They have applied in the past as they apply now and will apply in the future, no matter at which place. 17 / 45

Slide 58

Slide 58 text

Biological Approaches in Historical Linguistics Keys to the Past Keys to the Past: Uniformitarianism (C. Lyell) Uniformity of Change: Laws of change are uniform. They have applied in the past as they apply now and will apply in the future, no matter at which place. Graduality of Change: Change proceeds gradually, not abrupt. 17 / 45

Slide 59

Slide 59 text

Biological Approaches in Historical Linguistics Keys to the Past Keys to the Past: Uniformitarianism (C. Lyell) Uniformity of Change: Laws of change are uniform. They have applied in the past as they apply now and will apply in the future, no matter at which place. Graduality of Change: Change proceeds gradually, not abrupt. Abductive Reasoning: We can infer past events and processes by investigating patterns observed in the present, which becomes the “key to the interpretation of some mystery in the archives of remote ages” (Lyell 1830: 165) 17 / 45

Slide 60

Slide 60 text

Biological Approaches in Historical Linguistics Keys to the Past Keys to the Past: Uniformitarianism (A. Schleicher) Language Change is a gradual process (Schleicher 1848: 25). is a law-like process (Schleicher 1848: 25). is a natural process which occurs in all languages (Schleicher 1848: 25). universal process which occurs in all times (Schleicher 1863[1873]: 10f). allows us to infer past processes and extinct languages by investigating the languages of the present (see Schleicher 1848: 25). 18 / 45

Slide 61

Slide 61 text

Biological Approaches in Historical Linguistics Keys to the Past Keys to the Past: Summary It was not the direct exchange of ideas that lead to the de- velopment of similar approaches in biology and linguistics, but the astonishing fact that scholars in both fields would at about the same time detect striking parallels between both disciplines, both regarding their theoretical founda- tions and the processes they were investigating. 19 / 45

Slide 62

Slide 62 text

Biological Approaches in Historical Linguistics Keys to the Past Keys to the Past: Summary It was not the direct exchange of ideas that lead to the de- velopment of similar approaches in biology and linguistics, but the astonishing fact that scholars in both fields would at about the same time detect striking parallels between both disciplines, both regarding their theoretical founda- tions and the processes they were investigating. And linguists were the first to draw trees! 19 / 45

Slide 63

Slide 63 text

Biological Approaches in Historical Linguistics Keys to the Past Keys to the Past: Summary 1700 1800 1750 1850 List et al. (2016, Biology Direct) Stiernhielm's Lingua Nova 1671 Gallet's Arbre ca. 1800 Darwin's Origins 1859 De Buffon's Table 1755 Schleicher's Stammbaum 1853 Darwin's Tree Sketch 1837 Lamarck's Tableaux 1809 Čelakovský's Rodový Kmen 1853 Rühling's Tabula 1774 Hicke's Affinitas 1689 Schottels's Tabelle 1663 20 / 45

Slide 64

Slide 64 text

21 / 45

Slide 65

Slide 65 text

21 / 45

Slide 66

Slide 66 text

21 / 45

Slide 67

Slide 67 text

21 / 45

Slide 68

Slide 68 text

The Quantitative Turn The Quantitative Turn “Indo-European and computational cladistics” (Ringe, Warnow and Taylor 2002) “Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin” (Gray und Atkinson 2003) “Language classification by numbers” (McMahon und McMahon 2005) “Curious Parallels and Curious Connections: Phylogenetic Thinking in Biology and Historical Linguistics” (Atkinson und Gray 2005) “Automated classification of the world’s languages” (Brown et al. 2008) “Indo-European languages tree by Levenshtein distance” (Serva and Petroni 2008) “Networks uncover hidden lexical borrowing in Indo-European language evolution” (Nelson-Sathi et al. 2011) 22 / 45

Slide 69

Slide 69 text

The Quantitative Turn The Quantitative Turn “Indo-European and computational cladistics” (Ringe, Warnow and Taylor 2002) “Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin” (Gray und Atkinson 2003) “Language classification by numbers” (McMahon und McMahon 2005) “Curious Parallels and Curious Connections: Phylogenetic Thinking in Biology and Historical Linguistics” (Atkinson und Gray 2005) “Automated classification of the world’s languages” (Brown et al. 2008) “Indo-European languages tree by Levenshtein distance” (Serva and Petroni 2008) “Networks uncover hidden lexical borrowing in Indo-European language evolution” (Nelson-Sathi et al. 2011) 22 / 45

Slide 70

Slide 70 text

The Quantitative Turn The Quantitative Turn: Words as Genes Basic Concept German ID English ID Italian ID French ID HAND Hand 1 hand 1 mano 2 main 2 BLOOD Blut 3 blood 3 sangue 4 sang 4 HEAD Kopf 5 head 6 testa 7 tête 7 TOOTH Zahn 8 tooth 8 dente 8 dent 8 TO SLEEP schlafen 9 sleep 9 dormir 10 dormir 10 TO SAY sagen 11 say 11 dire 12 dire 12 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 23 / 45

Slide 71

Slide 71 text

The Quantitative Turn The Quantitative Turn: Words as Genes Basic Concept German ID English ID Italian ID French ID HAND Hand 1 hand 1 mano 2 main 2 BLOOD Blut 3 blood 3 sangue 4 sang 4 HEAD Kopf 5 head 6 testa 7 tête 7 TOOTH Zahn 8 tooth 8 dente 8 dent 8 TO SLEEP schlafen 9 sleep 9 dormir 10 dormir 10 TO SAY sagen 11 say 11 dire 12 dire 12 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 23 / 45

Slide 72

Slide 72 text

The Quantitative Turn The Quantitative Turn: Words as Genes ID Proto-Form Basic Concept German English Italian French 1 PGM *xanda- HAND 1 1 0 0 2 LAT mānus HAND 0 0 1 1 3 PGM *blođa- BLOOD 1 1 0 0 4 LAT sanguis BLOOD 0 0 1 1 5 PGM *kuppa- HEAD 1 0 0 0 6 PGM *xawbda- HEAD 0 1 0 0 7 LAT tēsta HEAD 0 0 1 1 8 PIE *h3 dont- TOOTH 1 1 1 1 9 PGM *slēpan- TO SLEEP 1 1 0 0 10 LAT dormīre TO SLEEP 0 0 1 1 11 PGM *sagjan- TO SAY 1 1 0 0 12 LAT dīcere TO SAY 0 0 1 1 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 23 / 45

Slide 73

Slide 73 text

The Quantitative Turn The Quantitative Turn: Words as Genes English 111 German 101 French 000 Italian 001 101 001 001 + B − C + A Char. English German French Italian A 1 1 0 0 B 1 0 0 0 C 1 1 0 1 23 / 45

Slide 74

Slide 74 text

Analogies and Parallels Analogies and Parallels Parallels between Species and Languages (Pagel 2009) aspect species languages unit of replication gene word replication asexual und sexual reproduction learning speciation cladogenesis language split forces of change natural selection and genetic drift social selection and trends differentiation tree-like tree-like 24 / 45

Slide 75

Slide 75 text

Analogies and Parallels Analogies and Parallels 25 / 45

Slide 76

Slide 76 text

Analogies and Parallels Analogies and Parallels 25 / 45

Slide 77

Slide 77 text

Analogies and Parallels Analogies and Parallels Differences between Species and Languages (Geisler & List 2013) Aspect Species Languages domain Popper’s World I Popper’s World III relation between form and function mechanical arbitrary origin monogenesis unclear sequence similarity universal (indepen- dent of species) language-specific differentiation tree-like network-like 26 / 45

Slide 78

Slide 78 text

Differences Differences in the Alphabets 27 / 45

Slide 79

Slide 79 text

Differences Differences in the Alphabets • universal • language-specific 27 / 45

Slide 80

Slide 80 text

Differences Differences in the Alphabets • universal • language-specific • limited • widely varying 27 / 45

Slide 81

Slide 81 text

Differences Differences in the Alphabets • universal • language-specific • limited • widely varying • constant • mutable 27 / 45

Slide 82

Slide 82 text

Differences Differences in the Processes GENES <=> WORDS HOMOLOGS <=> COGNATES 28 / 45

Slide 83

Slide 83 text

Differences Differences in the Processes: Homology The term homology was coined by Richard Owen (1804–1892), who distinguished ‘homologues’, as ‘the same organ in different animals under every variety of form and function’ (Owen 1843: 379), from from ‘analogues’ as an ‘organ in one animal which has the same function as another part or organ in a different animal’ (ibid.: 374). 29 / 45

Slide 84

Slide 84 text

Differences Differences in the Processes: Homology The term homology was coined by Richard Owen (1804–1892), who distinguished ‘homologues’, as ‘the same organ in different animals under every variety of form and function’ (Owen 1843: 379), from from ‘analogues’ as an ‘organ in one animal which has the same function as another part or organ in a different animal’ (ibid.: 374). Nowadays, it commonly denotes a ‘relationship of common descent between any entities, without further specification of the evolutionary scenario’ (Koonin 2005: 311). 29 / 45

Slide 85

Slide 85 text

Differences Differences in the Processes: Homology The term homology was coined by Richard Owen (1804–1892), who distinguished ‘homologues’, as ‘the same organ in different animals under every variety of form and function’ (Owen 1843: 379), from from ‘analogues’ as an ‘organ in one animal which has the same function as another part or organ in a different animal’ (ibid.: 374). Nowadays, it commonly denotes a ‘relationship of common descent between any entities, without further specification of the evolutionary scenario’ (Koonin 2005: 311). With respect to specific scenarios of common descent, molecular biologists characterize relationships between homologous genes further by distinguishing between orthology, paralogy, and xenology. 29 / 45

Slide 86

Slide 86 text

Differences Differences in the Processes: Homology B A C D duplication speciation lateral transfer D D orthologs paralogs xenologs B C D B A A B A B List (2016) 30 / 45

Slide 87

Slide 87 text

Differences Differences in the Processes: Homology Historical Relations Terminology Biology Linguistics common descent direct homology orthology cognacy.... ? oblique cognacy indirect paralogy involving lateral transfer xenology ? Linguistics indirect cognate relation (oblique cognacy) cognate relation (cognacy) ? ? ? 30 / 45

Slide 88

Slide 88 text

Differences Differences in the Processes: Homology Historical Relations Terminology Biology Linguistics common descent direct homology orthology cognacy.... ? oblique cognacy indirect paralogy involving lateral transfer xenology ? Linguistics direct cognate relation etymological relation indirect cognate relation (oblique cognacy) indirect etymological relation cognate relation (cognacy) List (2014) 30 / 45

Slide 89

Slide 89 text

Differences Differences in the Processes: Homology Relation Biol. Term continuity traditional notion of cognacy - + +/- +/- cognacy à la Swadesh - + +/- + direct cognate relation orthology + + + oblique cognate relation paralogy (?) + - + etymological relation homology +/- +/- +/- oblique etymological relation xenology - +/- +/- ... ... ... ... ... Stratic Morpho- logical Seman- tic List (2016) 30 / 45

Slide 90

Slide 90 text

Differences Differences in the Processes: Homology Italian dare French donner Indo-European *deh₃- *deh₃-no- Latin dare dōnum dōnāre Italian sole French soleil Swedish sol German Sonne Germanic *sōwel- *sunnō- Latin sol soliculus Indo-European *sóh₂-wl̩ - *sh₂én- A B List (2016) 30 / 45

Slide 91

Slide 91 text

Differences Differences in the Processes: Semantic Change hand arm foot day m eat animal day sand moon leg T₁ 31 / 45

Slide 92

Slide 92 text

Differences Differences in the Processes: Semantic Change hand arm foot day m eat animal day sand moon leg T₁ hand arm foot day m eat animal day sand moon leg T₂ 31 / 45

Slide 93

Slide 93 text

Differences Differences in the Processes: Semantic Change hand arm foot day m eat animal day sand moon leg T₂ ? ? ? 31 / 45

Slide 94

Slide 94 text

Differences Differences in the Processes: Semantic Change hand arm foot day m eat animal day sand moon leg T₂ hand arm foot day m eat animal sun sand moon leg 31 / 45

Slide 95

Slide 95 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Shifting the Paradigm 32 / 45

Slide 96

Slide 96 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects German m oː n t - English m uː n - - Danish m ɔː n - ə Swedish m oː n - e List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 33 / 45

Slide 97

Slide 97 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects German m oː n t - English m uː n - - Danish m ɔː n - ə Swedish m oː n - e Fúzhōu ŋ u o ʔ ⁵ - - - - - - - - - - Měixiàn ŋ i a t ⁵ - - - - - k u o ŋ ⁴⁴ Guǎngzhōu j - y t ² l - œ ŋ ²² - - - - - Běijīng - y ɛ - ⁵¹ l i ɑ ŋ - - - - - - List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 33 / 45

Slide 98

Slide 98 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects German m oː n t - English m uː n - - Danish m ɔː n - ə Swedish m oː n - e Fúzhōu ŋ u o ʔ ⁵ - - - - - - - - - - Měixiàn ŋ i a t ⁵ - - - - - k u o ŋ ⁴⁴ Guǎngzhōu j - y t ² l - œ ŋ ²² - - - - - Běijīng - y ɛ - ⁵¹ l i ɑ ŋ - - - - - - 1 2 3 4 number of morphemes per word 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 relative frequency all words nouns Compounds in the basic vocabulary (Swadesh1952) across 23 Chinese dialects (data by Hamed and Wang 2006) 30% 50% List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 33 / 45

Slide 99

Slide 99 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects German m oː n t - English m uː n - - Danish m ɔː n - ə Swedish m oː n - e Fúzhōu ŋ u o ʔ ⁵ - - - - - - - - - - Měixiàn ŋ i a t ⁵ - - - - - k u o ŋ ⁴⁴ Guǎngzhōu j - y t ² l - œ ŋ ²² - - - - - Běijīng - y ɛ - ⁵¹ l i ɑ ŋ - - - - - - "MOON" "MOON" "SHINE" "LIGHT" List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 33 / 45

Slide 100

Slide 100 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Fúzhōu Měixiàn Guǎngzhōu Běijīng List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 33 / 45

Slide 101

Slide 101 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Fúzhōu Měixiàn Guǎngzhōu Běijīng INNO VATIO N INNO VATIO N INNO VATIO N BO RRO W ING LO SS INNO VATIO N INNO VATIO N List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 33 / 45

Slide 102

Slide 102 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Fúzhōu Měixiàn Guǎngzhōu Běijīng Fúzhōu Měixiàn Guǎngzhōu Běijīng List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 34 / 45

Slide 103

Slide 103 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Fúzhōu Měixiàn Guǎngzhōu Běijīng Fúzhōu Měixiàn Guǎngzhōu Běijīng List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 34 / 45

Slide 104

Slide 104 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Fúzhōu Měixiàn Guǎngzhōu Běijīng List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 34 / 45

Slide 105

Slide 105 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Fúzhōu Měixiàn Guǎngzhōu Běijīng List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 34 / 45

Slide 106

Slide 106 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects LOSS INNO VATIO N INNO VATIO N BORROWING List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 34 / 45

Slide 107

Slide 107 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects The Crux with Partial Cognacy List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) We cannot model partial cognacy sufficiently when restricting our analyses to binary gain-loss models, as they are common in Bayesian phylogenetic analyses. Partial cognacy is too frequent to be ignored, not only in Sino-Tibetan languages, but also in many other language families (Austro-Asiatic, Hmong-Mien, Tai-Kadai). If we define binary cognacy on the basis of common morphemes, the majority of the items in our datasets will become cognate and we will loose a great deal of the phylogenetic signal. If we define binary cognacy on the basis of identical morphemes in all words, the majority of the items in our datasets will become non-cognate, and we will again loose a great deal of phylogenetic signal. 35 / 45

Slide 108

Slide 108 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects The Crux with Partial Cognacy A AC ABD AB A LANGUAGE 1 LANGUAGE 2 LANGUAGE 3 LANGUAGE 4 List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 36 / 45

Slide 109

Slide 109 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects The Crux with Partial Cognacy A AC ABD AB A LANGUAGE 1 LANGUAGE 2 LANGUAGE 3 LANGUAGE 4 List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 36 / 45

Slide 110

Slide 110 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects The Crux with Partial Cognacy AC ABD AB A LANGUAGE 1 LANGUAGE 2 LANGUAGE 3 LANGUAGE 4 List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 36 / 45

Slide 111

Slide 111 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects The Crux with Partial Cognacy AC ABD AB A LANGUAGE 1 LANGUAGE 2 LANGUAGE 3 LANGUAGE 4 List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 36 / 45

Slide 112

Slide 112 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects The Crux with Partial Cognacy AC ABD AB A LANGUAGE 1 LANGUAGE 2 LANGUAGE 3 LANGUAGE 4 List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 36 / 45

Slide 113

Slide 113 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects The Crux with Partial Cognacy When dealing with language families in which compounding and morphological derivation is so frequent that it covers more than 30 percent of the basic vocabulary of the languages, we need to incorporate partial cognacy our phylogenetic models. List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 36 / 45

Slide 114

Slide 114 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Directed, Weighted, Multi-State Parsimony and Lexical Change A AC ABD AB A LANGUAGE 1 LANGUAGE 2 LANGUAGE 3 LANGUAGE 4 37 / 45

Slide 115

Slide 115 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Directed, Weighted, Multi-State Parsimony and Lexical Change AC ABD AB A LANGUAGE 1 LANGUAGE 2 LANGUAGE 3 LANGUAGE 4 37 / 45

Slide 116

Slide 116 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Directed, Weighted, Multi-State Parsimony and Lexical Change AC ABD AB A LANGUAGE 1 LANGUAGE 2 LANGUAGE 3 LANGUAGE 4 37 / 45

Slide 117

Slide 117 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Directed, Weighted, Multi-State Parsimony and Lexical Change 月 月光 月光佛 月亮 月 0 1 2 1 月光 2 0 1 2 月光佛 4 2 0 4 月亮 2 2 3 0 月 月光 月光佛 月亮 月 0 1 2 1 月光 1 0 1 2 月光佛 2 1 0 3 月亮 1 2 3 0 月 月光 月光佛 月亮 月 0 1 1 1 月光 1 0 1 1 月光佛 1 1 0 1 月亮 1 1 1 0 月 光 月 光 佛 - 月 亮 月 光 佛 - 0 0 1 0 2 2 = 1 = 4 月 光 月 光 佛 - 月 亮 月 光 佛 - 0 0 1 0 2 1 = 1 = 3 Transition Penalty (SANKOFF) Transition Penalty (DWST) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 A B C 38 / 45

Slide 118

Slide 118 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Directed, Weighted, Multi-State Parsimony and Lexical Change 月 月光 月光佛 月亮 月 0 1 2 1 月光 2 0 1 2 月光佛 4 2 0 4 月亮 2 2 3 0 月 月光 月光佛 月亮 月 0 1 2 1 月光 1 0 1 2 月光佛 2 1 0 3 月亮 1 2 3 0 月 月光 月光佛 月亮 月 0 1 1 1 月光 1 0 1 1 月光佛 1 1 0 1 月亮 1 1 1 0 月 光 月 光 佛 - 月 亮 月 光 佛 - 0 0 1 0 2 2 = 1 = 4 月 光 月 光 佛 - 月 亮 月 光 佛 - 0 0 1 0 2 1 = 1 = 3 Transition Penalty (SANKOFF) Transition Penalty (DWST) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 A B C 38 / 45

Slide 119

Slide 119 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Directed, Weighted, Multi-State Parsimony and Lexical Change 月 月光 月光佛 月亮 月 0 1 2 1 月光 2 0 1 2 月光佛 4 2 0 4 月亮 2 2 3 0 月 月光 月光佛 月亮 月 0 1 2 1 月光 1 0 1 2 月光佛 2 1 0 3 月亮 1 2 3 0 月 月光 月光佛 月亮 月 0 1 1 1 月光 1 0 1 1 月光佛 1 1 0 1 月亮 1 1 1 0 月 光 月 光 佛 - 月 亮 月 光 佛 - 0 0 1 0 2 2 = 1 = 4 月 光 月 光 佛 - 月 亮 月 光 佛 - 0 0 1 0 2 1 = 1 = 3 Transition Penalty (SANKOFF) Transition Penalty (DWST) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 A B C 38 / 45

Slide 120

Slide 120 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Testing the Method on Chinese Dialect Data List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 22 Chinese dialect varieties with Chinese character readings (basis vocabulary, data by Hamed and Wang 2006), 57 nouns in which Ancient Chinese forms expressing the concepts are known to us and are are also still preserved in at least one Chinese dialect, three reference phylogenies (Arbre by Sagart 2011, Southern Chinese by Norman 2003, Shùxíngtú by Yóu 1992), four models of lexical change (binary, unweighted, weighted, weighted and directed). 39 / 45

Slide 121

Slide 121 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Results Model Arbre Hits Fails Score BINARY 0.55 / 31.04 0.45 / 24.96 695 FITCH 0.63 / 35.51 0.37 / 20.49 322 SANKOFF 0.76 / 42.83 0.24 / 13.17 508 DWST 0.82 / 45.70 0.18 / 10.30 532 Model Southern Chinese Hits Fails Score BINARY 0.52 / 28.95 0.48 / 27.05 719 FITCH 0.47 / 26.40 0.53 / 29.60 328 SANKOFF 0.62 / 34.50 0.38 / 21.50 518 DWST 0.79 / 44.50 0.21 / 11.50 546 Xiāng Yuè Mǐn Wú Mandarin Hakka Gàn Xiāng Yuè Wú Mandarin Mǐn Hakka Gàn Xiāng Mandarin Wú Yuè Mǐn Hakka Gàn Model Shùxíngtú Hits Fails Score BINARY 0.52 / 29.04 0.48 / 26.96 726 FITCH 0.51 / 28.31 0.49 / 27.69 336 SANKOFF 0.67 / 37.50 0.33 / 18.50 524 DWST 0.82 / 46.00 0.18 / 10.00 546 List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 40 / 45

Slide 122

Slide 122 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Examples Fúzhōu Táiběi Xiàmén Zhāngpíng Mǐn Guǎngzhōu Měixiàn Liánchéng Hakka Wēnzhōu Níngbō Sūzhōu Shànghǎi Shànghǎi_B Wú Nánchāng Ānyì Gàn Chángshā Shuāngfēng Xiāng Yàngshān Wǔhàn Níngxià Chéngdū Běijīng Tàiyuán Yúcì Guānhuà 月 月娘 月光佛 月光 月亮 月明 ‘MOON’ ‘MOON-MOTHER’ ‘MOON-LIGHT’ ‘MOON-LIGHT-SUFFIX’ ‘MOON-SHINE’ ‘MOON-BRIGHT’ List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 41 / 45

Slide 123

Slide 123 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Examples Fúzhōu Táiběi Xiàmén Zhāngpíng Mǐn Guǎngzhōu Měixiàn Liánchéng Hakka Wēnzhōu Níngbō Sūzhōu Shànghǎi Shànghǎi_B Wú Nánchāng Ānyì Gàn Chángshā Shuāngfēng Xiāng Yàngshān Wǔhàn Níngxià Chéngdū Běijīng Tàiyuán Yúcì Guānhuà 月 月娘 月光佛 月光 月亮 月明 ‘MOON’ ‘MOON-MOTHER’ ‘MOON-LIGHT’ ‘MOON-LIGHT-SUFFIX’ ‘MOON-SHINE’ ‘MOON-BRIGHT’ List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 41 / 45

Slide 124

Slide 124 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Examples Fúzhōu Táiběi Xiàmén Zhāngpíng Mǐn Guǎngzhōu Měixiàn Liánchéng Hakka Wēnzhōu Níngbō Sūzhōu Shànghǎi Shànghǎi_B Wú Nánchāng Ānyì Gàn Chángshā Shuāngfēng Xiāng Yàngshān Wǔhàn Níngxià Chéngdū Běijīng Tàiyuán Yúcì Guānhuà 月 月娘 月光佛 月光 月亮 月明 ‘MOON’ ‘MOON-MOTHER’ ‘MOON-LIGHT’ ‘MOON-LIGHT-SUFFIX’ ‘MOON-SHINE’ ‘MOON-BRIGHT’ List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 41 / 45

Slide 125

Slide 125 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Examples Fúzhōu Táiběi Xiàmén Zhāngpíng Mǐn Guǎngzhōu Měixiàn Liánchéng Hakka Wēnzhōu Níngbō Sūzhōu Shànghǎi Shànghǎi_B Wú Nánchāng Ānyì Gàn Chángshā Shuāngfēng Xiāng Yàngshān Wǔhàn Níngxià Chéngdū Běijīng Tàiyuán Yúcì Guānhuà 月 月娘 月光佛 月光 月亮 月明 ‘MOON’ ‘MOON-MOTHER’ ‘MOON-LIGHT’ ‘MOON-LIGHT-SUFFIX’ ‘MOON-SHINE’ ‘MOON-BRIGHT’ List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 41 / 45

Slide 126

Slide 126 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Examples Fúzhōu Táiběi Xiàmén Zhāngpíng Mǐn Guǎngzhōu Měixiàn Liánchéng Hakka Wēnzhōu Níngbō Sūzhōu Shànghǎi Shànghǎi_B Wú Nánchāng Ānyì Gàn Chángshā Shuāngfēng Xiāng Yàngshān Wǔhàn Níngxià Chéngdū Běijīng Tàiyuán Yúcì Guānhuà 月 月娘 月光佛 月光 月亮 月明 ‘MOON’ ‘MOON-MOTHER’ ‘MOON-LIGHT’ ‘MOON-LIGHT-SUFFIX’ ‘MOON-SHINE’ ‘MOON-BRIGHT’ List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 41 / 45

Slide 127

Slide 127 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Examples Fúzhōu Táiběi Xiàmén Zhāngpíng Mǐn Guǎngzhōu Měixiàn Liánchéng Hakka Wēnzhōu Níngbō Sūzhōu Shànghǎi Shànghǎi_B Wú Nánchāng Ānyì Gàn Chángshā Shuāngfēng Xiāng Yàngshān Wǔhàn Níngxià Chéngdū Běijīng Tàiyuán Yúcì Guānhuà 月 月娘 月光佛 月光 月亮 月明 ‘MOON’ ‘MOON-MOTHER’ ‘MOON-LIGHT’ ‘MOON-LIGHT-SUFFIX’ ‘MOON-SHINE’ ‘MOON-BRIGHT’ List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 41 / 45

Slide 128

Slide 128 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Examples Fúzhōu Táiběi Xiàmén Zhāngpíng Mǐn Guǎngzhōu Měixiàn Liánchéng Hakka Wēnzhōu Níngbō Sūzhōu Shànghǎi Shànghǎi_B Wú Nánchāng Ānyì Gàn Chángshā Shuāngfēng Xiāng Yàngshān Wǔhàn Níngxià Chéngdū Běijīng Tàiyuán Yúcì Guānhuà 月 月娘 月光佛 月光 月亮 月明 ‘MOON’ ‘MOON-MOTHER’ ‘MOON-LIGHT’ ‘MOON-LIGHT-SUFFIX’ ‘MOON-SHINE’ ‘MOON-BRIGHT’ List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 41 / 45

Slide 129

Slide 129 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Examples Fúzhōu Táiběi Xiàmén Zhāngpíng Mǐn Guǎngzhōu Měixiàn Liánchéng Hakka Wēnzhōu Níngbō Sūzhōu Shànghǎi Shànghǎi_B Wú Nánchāng Ānyì Gàn Chángshā Shuāngfēng Xiāng Yàngshān Wǔhàn Níngxià Chéngdū Běijīng Tàiyuán Yúcì Guānhuà 月 月娘 月光佛 月光 月亮 月明 ‘MOON’ ‘MOON-MOTHER’ ‘MOON-LIGHT’ ‘MOON-LIGHT-SUFFIX’ ‘MOON-SHINE’ ‘MOON-BRIGHT’ List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 41 / 45

Slide 130

Slide 130 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Examples Fúzhōu Táiběi Xiàmén Zhāngpíng Mǐn Guǎngzhōu Měixiàn Liánchéng Hakka Wēnzhōu Níngbō Sūzhōu Shànghǎi Shànghǎi_B Wú Nánchāng Ānyì Gàn Chángshā Shuāngfēng Xiāng Yàngshān Wǔhàn Níngxià Chéngdū Běijīng Tàiyuán Yúcì Guānhuà 月 月娘 月光佛 月光 月亮 月明 ‘MOON’ ‘MOON-MOTHER’ ‘MOON-LIGHT’ ‘MOON-LIGHT-SUFFIX’ ‘MOON-SHINE’ ‘MOON-BRIGHT’ List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 41 / 45

Slide 131

Slide 131 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Examples Fúzhōu Táiběi Xiàmén Zhāngpíng Mǐn Guǎngzhōu Měixiàn Liánchéng Hakka Wēnzhōu Níngbō Sūzhōu Shànghǎi Shànghǎi_B Wú Nánchāng Ānyì Gàn Chángshā Shuāngfēng Xiāng Yàngshān Wǔhàn Níngxià Chéngdū Běijīng Tàiyuán Yúcì Guānhuà 月 月娘 月光佛 月光 月亮 月明 ‘MOON’ ‘MOON-MOTHER’ ‘MOON-LIGHT’ ‘MOON-LIGHT-SUFFIX’ ‘MOON-SHINE’ ‘MOON-BRIGHT’ List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 41 / 45

Slide 132

Slide 132 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Examples Fúzhōu Táiběi Xiàmén Zhāngpíng Mǐn Guǎngzhōu Měixiàn Liánchéng Hakka Wēnzhōu Níngbō Sūzhōu Shànghǎi Shànghǎi_B Wú Nánchāng Ānyì Gàn Chángshā Shuāngfēng Xiāng Yàngshān Wǔhàn Níngxià Chéngdū Běijīng Tàiyuán Yúcì Guānhuà 月 月娘 月光佛 月光 月亮 月明 ‘MOON’ ‘MOON-MOTHER’ ‘MOON-LIGHT’ ‘MOON-LIGHT-SUFFIX’ ‘MOON-SHINE’ ‘MOON-BRIGHT’ List (2016, Journal of Language Evolution) 41 / 45

Slide 133

Slide 133 text

New Approaches to Phylogenetic Reconstruction Lexical Change in the Chinese Dialects Interactive Application An interactive application showing all inferred evolutionary scenarios for the Arbre phylogeny by Sagart (2011) is available at http://digling.github.io/beyond-cognacy-paper/. 42 / 45

Slide 134

Slide 134 text

Outlook Outlook Outlook 43 / 45

Slide 135

Slide 135 text

Outlook Outlook If we want to profit from computational analyses in historical linguistics, we need to increase the complexity of our models. In order to profit from existing biological approaches, we need to foster a close collaboration between computational linguistics, computational biologists, but also and especially between classical biologists and linguistics. We need to be extremely careful with our analogies. Instead of transfering methods blindly, we should not forget that we may have to adapt them first to meet the specific needs of the target discipline. 44 / 45

Slide 136

Slide 136 text

Thanks for Your Attention! 45 / 45