Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Metrics_presentation_Fall_2013.pdf

Avatar for thart thart
November 01, 2013
15

 Metrics_presentation_Fall_2013.pdf

Avatar for thart

thart

November 01, 2013

Transcript

  1. Overview Visit Trends Getty Visits in Context Visitor Satisfaction Morey

    report standings Semi Annual Intercepts Web Traffic Foresee results
  2. Visit Seasonality - Center 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000

    120,000 130,000 140,000 150,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Monthly Total 2013 Monthly Total 2012 Monthly Total 2011 Monthly Total 2010 Monthly Total 2009 Monthly Total 2008 Monthly Total 2007 Monthly Total 2006 Monthly Total 2005
  3. 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000

    50,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 2013 Total 2012 Total 2011 Total 2010 Total 2009 Total 2008 Total 2007 Total 2006 Visit Seasonality - Villa
  4. 115,000 Foreign 163,000 SoCal 89,000 Foreign 181,000 SoCal 30% increase

    11% decrease Getty Center – Foreign and Local Visitor Count Summer 2012 and 2013 In summer 2013 the Special Exhibitions Pavilion was closed during the survey • SoCal visitors main reason for visiting was to see an exhibition 12% • California (not SoCal) 0% • Other USA 8% • Outside USA 9% In summer 2012 Ritts and Klimt were on view during the survey • SoCal visitors main reason for visiting was to see an exhibition 39% • California (not SoCal) 15% • Other USA 30% • Outside USA 17% 399,000 summer 2013 371,000 summer 2012 24% Foreign 49% SoCal 29% Foreign 41% SoCal Total Summer Visits Origin Reputation Traffic!
  5. Visitor Satisfaction Word of Mouth 95 3.2 Likelihood to Return

    91 2.9 88 Visitor Satisfaction Index Satisfaction Drivers Future Behaviors Art/Architecture/Garden 91 Environment 93 Museum Shops 82 Arrival Experience 85 Value for Price 86 Restaurants & Cafes 84 Wayfinding 86 Website 90 Parking 74 ‘12 ‘12 2.0 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.1 ‘12 ‘12 ‘12 Driver Scores Impacts Impacts ‘13 83 84 92 93 87 90 90 86 75 ‘13 89 3.0 0.4 0.1 0.4 0 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.2 ‘13 ‘13 3.6 3.5 95 91 ‘13 22
  6. Qtr 2, 2012 Qtr 3, 2012 Qtr 4, 2012 Qtr

    1, 2013 Qtr 2, 2013 Wayfinding 87 86 87 85 87 Layout/flow of the buildings 85 86 85 83 85 Ease of finding exhibitions 82 83 83 80 83 Ease of finding restrooms 86 84 87 84 85 Ease of finding food services 87 88 89 86 88 Clarity of signage 84 83 85 82 85 Usefulness of maps provided 88 87 88 85 89 Helpfulness of info desk staff 93 92 95 93 94 Security staff performance 90 91 92 91 93 75 80 85 90 95 100 Driver Detail – Wayfinding  Wayfinding exhibits the 2nd highest impact on VSI.  Within Wayfinding incremental improvement could be made to Ease of finding exhibitions 23 Impact = 0.7 Aggregate score= 87 “My only real concern is that the signage on when and where photography is allowed could be more clear (bigger and more prominent). For example, I do not recall seeing any signs in the photography exhibit that said "no photography.” The security staff was very quick to instruct people not to take pictures when they saw it happening, but it might be worth posting more signs so that people know ahead of time.” RESPONDENT VSI: 96
  7. 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 Q2 2011

    Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Wayfinding Ease of finding food services Clarity of signage Ease of finding restrooms Ease of finding exhibitions 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 Wayfinding – Longer term/smoothed
  8. Under 65 Over 65 87 83 85 87 88 84

    88 93 91 85 82 83 84 84 81 84 93 89 Wayfinding 85 Layout/flow of the buildings 83 Ease of finding exhibitions 84 Ease of finding restrooms 83 Ease of finding food services 83 Clarity of signage 82 Usefulness of maps provided 85 Helpfulness of info desk staff 92 Security staff performance 87 18 - 44 Wayfinding – Audience Segments
  9. Driver Detail – Restaurants & Cafes  While Seating availability

    and Food staff performance report exceptional results, Variety of menu items and Quality of food offer opportunities for marginal improvement.  Additionally, Value for the price paid continues to be the lowest rated attribute, with The Café at The Getty (75) and Garden Terrace Café (71) reporting lower scores compared to The Restaurant at The Getty (84). 26 Qtr 2, 2012 Qtr 3, 2012 Qtr 4, 2012 Qtr 1, 2013 Qtr 2, 2013 Restaurants and Cafes 85 83 86 83 84 Variety of menu items 83 80 85 84 84 Quality of food 85 83 86 83 84 Seating availability 89 88 90 87 89 Value for price paid 76 74 79 72 75 Food staff performance 88 87 89 86 88 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Impact = 0.5 Aggregate score= 84 Usage of Restaurants & Cafés* (Q3’12-Q2’13) 64% 36% Yes, Visited No, did not visit Let’s look at this more closely
  10.  Looking at scores across the three eateries, Variety of

    menu items and Quality of food rate lowest for Garden Terrace Café.  Due to lower scores, the Garden Terrance Café should be prioritized for improvement efforts. Usage of Restaurants & Cafés Yes, visited Getty Restaurants & Cafés Q3’12-Q2’13 Café at The Getty Restaurant at The Getty Garden Terrace Café Number of Respondents n=954 % Yes, visited 51% 14% 35% Value for the price paid 75 84 71 Quality of food 85 92 79 Variety of menu items 87 86 76 VSI 89 90 89 Return 90 92 90 Recommend 96 97 96 27
  11. Driver Detail – Value for Price  Value for the

    Price scores have remained consistent over the past year, with exception of a temporary decline in Q4 2012.  Though there is no cost for experiencing the museum, many customers voice displeasure over the $15 charged for parking. 28 Qtr 2, 2012 Qtr 3, 2012 Qtr 4, 2012 Qtr 1, 2013 Qtr 2, 2013 Value for Price 89 90 87 90 90 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Impact = N/A Aggregate score= 90 “The price of parking is very expensive for college students.” RESPONDENT VSI: 89 “For a senior the parking is expensive. We use the Metro bus, but it is difficult to visit evening lectures/programs, when bus is going every 30 - 40 minutes.” RESPONDENT VSI: 89
  12. Value for price of admission 73 Parking 63 Parking convenience

    72 Parking cost 48 83 79 87 67 Local 3 visits + Local Non-Local Local 1 visit 53 52 62 36 85 68 76 56 Value Segmentation – Summer 2013
  13. Driver Detail – Art/Arch/Gardens Impact = 3.0 Aggregate score= 92

     Following historical trends, Gardens and exterior spaces continue to most extremely high scores while Collection compared to others is the lowest rated measure.  Given the high impact Art Collection has on VSI, it is imperative to maintain these high scores.  Scores here remain high across a variety of customer segmentations (e.g. if they were/were not part of a guided tour, age, etc.). 30 Qtr 2, 2012 Qtr 3, 2012 Qtr 4, 2012 Qtr 1, 2013 Qtr 2, 2013 Art Collection 91 92 91 91 91 Enjoyment of the art viewed 93 93 92 92 92 Art pieces were interesting 92 92 91 91 91 Collection compared to others 84 84 83 84 83 Architectural Interest 94 94 94 94 94 Gardens and exterior spaces 93 96 97 94 97 75 80 85 90 95 100 “I would have appreciated information on how and when the Getty acquired each item on display. Perhaps people would be more committed to its preservation and presentation if they felt like part of the process that researches, acquires and celebrates these precious and inspiring works.” RESPONDENT VSI: 100
  14. 23% 11% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% /art/

    /visit/ /research/ /vow/ /museum/ /gateway/ /index.html /education/ /conservation/ Web Traffic Distribution by % Page Views
  15. 132% gain in International traffic (in Visits) From roughly 141k

    to 327k International went from 22% to 34% of the total as overall visits grew
  16. Where did the new traffic go? (in page views) %

    of total Getty.edu page views
  17. • Web survey using the ASCI methodology • Desktop and

    Mobile versions • Collecting data since June 2013 • Primary objective: Measure the effectiveness of the Visit redesign • And much, much more
  18. Perception of the Getty Before and After Getty.edu Visit What

    was your general perception of The Getty before/after using this website today? June 01, 2013 - September 25, 2013 91% top 2 scores 81% top 2 scores