Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Jasmine, BDD for JavaScript
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Chris Bushell
May 18, 2011
130
1
Share
Jasmine, BDD for JavaScript
Prepared for the Melbourne Patterns Group
Chris Bushell
May 18, 2011
More Decks by Chris Bushell
See All by Chris Bushell
Test Automation for Packaged Systems: Yes You Can!
cbushell
0
80
Introduction to Pair Programming
cbushell
1
140
An Introduction to BDD
cbushell
5
180
An Introduction to HTTP
cbushell
2
140
Agile Test Automation
cbushell
2
190
Working Effectively With Legacy Code
cbushell
4
260
Branches Are For Trees. How to Develop Software Without Them
cbushell
1
120
State Pattern From GoF
cbushell
1
76
Continuous Integration, fast builds and Flot
cbushell
2
83
Featured
See All Featured
Connecting the Dots Between Site Speed, User Experience & Your Business [WebExpo 2025]
tammyeverts
11
930
SERP Conf. Vienna - Web Accessibility: Optimizing for Inclusivity and SEO
sarafernandez
2
1.5k
Designing Experiences People Love
moore
143
24k
Leveraging Curiosity to Care for An Aging Population
cassininazir
1
250
How to Create Impact in a Changing Tech Landscape [PerfNow 2023]
tammyeverts
55
3.4k
Balancing Empowerment & Direction
lara
6
1.1k
SEO in 2025: How to Prepare for the Future of Search
ipullrank
3
3.5k
Keith and Marios Guide to Fast Websites
keithpitt
413
23k
AI Search: Where Are We & What Can We Do About It?
aleyda
0
7.5k
Building Adaptive Systems
keathley
44
3k
4 Signs Your Business is Dying
shpigford
187
22k
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
productmarketing
PRO
24
4.1k
Transcript
BDD for JavaScript
A li1le history….
1995, Netscape, Mocha, LiveScript, JavaScript (aka ECMAScript)
None
1999, MicrosoD, XMLHTTPRequest
2004, GMail
2005, Jesse James Garret, Ajax: A New Approach to
Web ApplicaWons
None
2011, GitHub
Development has outpaced tesWng maturity
Why the tendency only to integraWon test our JavaScript?
An idea! Test driven JavaScript
Meet Jasmine…. and JsUnit and JsTestDriver
and Screw.Unit and JSMockito etc.
Why Jasmine? RSpec like syntax Super fast
Easy to integrate Runs anywhere JavaScript runs Supports tesWng of asynchronous code
So, show me….
Some extensions h1ps://github.com/mhevery/jasmine-‐node h1p://rudyla1ae.github.com/jasmine-‐species h1ps://github.com/pivotal/jasmine-‐ajax
Jasmine jQuery • Custom matchers • toHaveHtml(string)
• toBeHidden() • toBeSelected() • spyOnEvent($(‘#some element’), ‘click’) • An API for loading HTML fixtures • loadFixtures(‘myFixturesFile.html’);
Working with the DOM • DRY • Use
your applicaWon to generate the fixture data from actual views • Load the fixture using XHR • Example: h1ps://github.com/pivotaljb/js-‐ fixture-‐example
Watch out for…. • Syntax errors cause specs to
fail silently • Different browsers, different traces