body of the document, the ink, the seal and the threads. Multiple approaches for identifying the materials used were triangulated to enhance the credibility of the findings. Main Body The charter is written on parchment. This is made from animal skin which is chemically prepared, scraped and dried under tension. Identification methods: Observation with the naked eye and through magnification using the Dino-Lite digital microscope were used to identify features physical of the parchment. The weight, thickness and texture of the main body are indicative of parchment and pores are visible under magnification confirming the animal based origin of the material. The arrangement of these pores has been compared to known samples in an attempt to identify the animal the parchment is made from. The results from this, however, were inconclusive. FTIR analysis conducted at two parchment locations supports the observations. When comparing the waveform and peak values for the charter (figure) to the results for a range of parchments the analysis aligns. This means the charter of King John is comprised of the same organic compounds and is also parchment. Historical research informs us that parchment was commonly used as a writing surface in the late medieval period with sheep and cow being the most common sources in the UK. Sheep skin was often used for royal charters as only one side can be written on making it difficult to tamper with the document. These methods are not enough to conclusively identify what animal the parchment is made from. The only way to know for sure would be to conduct destructive DNA testing. As all types of parchment are cared for the same the information gained would not justify the effect on the parchment to make conducting this method worthwhile. Text The ink used to write the charter is iron gall ink. The ink is made from readily available inexpensive ingredients. Whilst recipes differ in ingredient ratios and preparation methods recipes typically involve combining tannins, from gall nuts, iron sulphate, and water. Identification methods: The dark brown-black colour of the ink observed is typical of iron gall and other inks. The Dino-Lite images show the characteristic brown colouring of iron gall ink deterioration. By being able to make connections between the charter and the Magna Carter (a contemporary example of iron gall ink on parchment) this adds validity to the observations. Results of the XRF analysis of the ink are shown in the table below. The use of iron gall ink fits the historical context of the object as it has been used for over 2000 years and was the ink of choice across Europe throughout the middle ages. Seal The seal is made from a combination of original wax, in dark green, and more modern wax, white, used to hold the seal fragments together. The original seal was made my mixing beeswax with pigments and, when heated, was pressed between two metal matrices to form the unique double sided design of King John’s royal seal. Identification methods: The FTIR analysis from readings taken at two areas of original wax matches results from known samples of beeswax. This demonstrates that they share the same organic compounds and confirms the seal material as beeswax. The FTIR analysis is supported by historical context. Pigmented beeswax was used for making almost all seals in the medieval period, including royal seals. The seals on the Magna Carta documents were made of beeswax. The Magna Carta was sealed using King John’s great seal just 15 years after the Lincoln charter. The pigments used in the seal are more difficult to identify. X-ray imaging of the seal shows the dense pigment particles distributed throughout the wax. The wax is green in colour which can be seen with the naked eye and more clearly through magnification. The green colouring suggests copper forms a significant part of the pigment. The most common green pigments used in England in the late medieval period were Verdigris and Malachite. These are both copper based compounds. The nonorganic elements present in the wax are shown by the XRF results below. Threads The thread is made from dyed double ply silk fibres. Silk is made by boiling and unwinding cocoons produced by silkworms. These are twisted together to form silk threads which are often dyed using a variety of pigments. The threads on the charter have been used to attach the seal to the document. The threads were embedded into the seal when it was formed and threaded through a hole the folded area at the bottom of the parchment. Identification methods: The double ply and s twist are visible without magnification but are easier to examine with the help of the Dino-Lite and a microscope with a Dino-Eye eyepiece. The magnified strands were compared to known samples of silk to confirm the fibres carried the same characteristics of smooth strands commonly oblong in shape. Identifying these similarities confirms the charters threads as silk. The FTIR analysis further confirms the identification of silk as the peaks show the presence of peptides. Silk was also a common fibre to use when sealing royal charters bringing validity to the age and origin of the charter. As the original pigment has faded significantly it is difficult to identify the silk’s original colour. Some areas of red and yellow remain but it is impossible to gauge how much these have altered from the original shade. Attempts at XRF analysis did not aid in identifying the pigments used as there was a too varied spread of elements making it difficult to determine which may belong to the original pigments and which are contaminants. To learn more about the techniques used to identify the materials see the Testing page. Threads Table Parchment Parchment faded Table Figure: FTIR analysis of the charter’s parchment. Figure: FTIR analysis of various parchment samples (Boyatzis, et al., 2016). Figure: Charter parchment, recto. Figure: Difference in texture of the writing side and folded over ‘back’ of the parchment. Figure: Dino-Lite image of parchment pores [55x]. Figure: Parchment pores calf, left, and sheep, right. [45x] (Johnson, 2022). Element Concentration (%) Analysis Iron (Fe) 34.45 The high concentration of iron is to be expected when analysing iron gall ink. Rhodium (Rh) 31.40 Found in copper which was often added to iron gall ink mixtures. Ruthenium (Ru) 12.23 Found in copper which was often added to iron gall ink mixtures. Gold (Au) 9.18 Possibly unintentionally added to the ink during preparation or the parchment has come into contact with a gold object during its history. Rhenium (Re) 7.71 Found in copper which was often added to iron gall ink mixtures. Figure: Charter text sample. Figure: Dino-Lite image of ink, a [55x]. Figure: Dino-Lite image of ink, b [57x]. Figure: Iron gall ink on Magna Carta, 1215, a [30x] (Duffy, 2015). Figure: Iron gall ink on Magna Carta, 1215, b [30x] (Duffy, 2015). Figure: Charter parchment, verso. Figure: King John’s great seal, recto. Figure: King John’s great seal, verso. Figure: Dino-Lite image of detail in wax seal [45x]. Figure: Dino-Lite image of green pigmented wax seal [45x]. Figure: Dino-Lite image of green (original) and white (modern) wax [40x]. Seal a Seal b Table Figure: FTIR analysis of the original wax. Figure: FTIR analysis of beeswax (Heinzel, et al., 2023). Figure: X-ray image of wax seal. Element Concentration (%) Analysis Copper (Cu) 66.31 The high concentration of copper confirms the analysis of the other identification methods. Suggesting the pigment is likely Verdigris or Malachite based. Silicon (Si) 14.70 These elements are likely impurities in the copper compound pigment or possibly a contaminant of the beeswax. Aluminium (Al) 7.32 Magnesium (Mg) 7.10 Lead (Pb) 1.59 Iron (Fe) 1.44 Cobalt (Co) 1.01 Figure: Threads connecting the parchment to the seal, recto. Figure: Dino-Lite image showing some colour in threads [40x]. Figure: Threads exiting the bottom of the seal, recto. Figure: Dino-Lite image showing thread density [40x]. Figure: Dino-Lite image showing ply and twist [40x]. Figure: Dino-Eye image showing ply and twist [80x]. Figure: FTIR analysis of the threads. Figure: Dino-Eye image showing characteristic silk [80x]. Figure: Silk sample [80x] (Dyer, et al., 2018). Figure: FTIR analysis of hard and soft silk samples (Geminiani, et al., 2023).