(CAADP) adopted by the African Union (AU) Heads of State and Government in 2003 in Maputo (The Maputo Declaration) as the Flagship Program of the African Union for agriculture and food security. ü The Declaration on Accelerated Agricultural Growth and Transformation in June 2014 in Malabo adopted by AU Heads of State and Government sets the Africa 2025 Vision for Agriculture implemented within the Framework of CAADP. ü Among other commitments, the leaders committed to Mutual Accountability to Results and Actions.
leaders requested AUC and AUDA/NEPAD together with the RECs and Member States, in collaboration with partner institutions to: 1. Develop mechanisms that enhance Africa’s capacity for knowledge and data generation and management to strengthen evidence-based planning and implementation. 2. Institutionalize a system for peer review that encourages good performance on achievement of progress made in implementing the provisions of this Declaration and recognize biennially exemplary performance through awards. 3. Conduct on a biennial basis, beginning from year 2017, Agricultural Review Process, and start reporting on progress to the Assembly from its January 2018 Ordinary Session.
(BR) processes to report on the implementation of the Malabo Declaration q 7 Malabo commitments translated into 7 thematic areas of performance Re-committing to the Principles and Values of the CAADP Process Enhancing investment finance in agriculture Ending Hunger in Africa by 2025 Halving poverty through agriculture by 2025 Enhancing resilience to climate variability Strengthening mutual accountability to actions and results Boosting intra-African trade in agricultural commodities and services
primary mutual accountability mechanism that the African Union and its Member States use to track the implementation of the CAADP. q The first BR: 47 out of 55 countries participated fully • 17 out of the 47 were on-track to achieving the target in 2025 (threshold was 3.94) • Rwanda (1st), Mali (2nd ) and Morocco (3rd ) were the top performers q The Second BR: 49 out of 55 countries participated fully • 4 countries were on track (threshold was 6.66) • Top performers: Rwanda (7.24), Morocco (6.96), Mali (6.82) and Ghana (6.67). 36 made tremendous progress from BR2 q The Third BR: 51 out of 55 AU countries participated • Rwanda was on track (passed the threshold of 7.28) • 21 countries are regarded as progressing well (scored 5 and above, but less than the 7.28 benchmark) • So far Africa as a continent scores just 4.32 ie not on track q The Results of the Fourth BR will be released in January/February 2.Objectives of the Biennial Review
that affect the entire BR process. The actions in the BR process are well articulated, however limited by human capacity, financial ..etc. that affects the timeliness, data quality, limits multistakeholder/sectorial participation/inclusiveness, training etc • Timeliness issues in collecting, cleaning, and analyzing data. • Scarce resources for multi-stakeholder validation of draft national BR reports. • The problem of resource mobilization and its availability on time for countries is a major challenge • Limited trained personnel for prompt data collection. • Limited technical capacity and coordination among CAADP focal points affecting accurate estimation. • How to increase member state ownership/commitment to the process
Patterns : Repetition of the same numbers over the years casts doubts on data validity. • Discrepancies in Indicators :Differences between reported data and expected values for various indicators, both internally and externally. • Data Variability and Inconsistencies : Significant variations in reported data from year to year, indicating inconsistencies in measurement or reporting. • Verification and Validity : Need to verify how indicators are calculated versus documented methodologies for accuracy and validity. • Challenges in External Consistency :Differences between reported data and external sources question the reliability of reported information. • Missing Values and Measurement Units :Significant missing values and inconsistency in measurement units hinder accurate reporting, Numerous instances of missing values across various indicators.
aimed at bolstering regional experts' skills in utilizing updated CAADP BR reporting tools, enhancing their capabilities. • Knowledge Exchange: Strengthen the sharing of knowledge and BR best practices among Member States and RECs (promote Per to per learning, exchange visite, etc.). • Continuous Improvement : the usefulness of the critical analysis process (Critical analysis of the BR process each 2 years after launch of the report has provided opportunity for lesson learning and continuous improvement in the BR process and cycle) • Technical Expertise Strengthening: Prioritizing a deep understanding of technical guidelines and country reporting templates ensured experts' proficiency in the CAADP Biennial Review process. • Regional Expert Empowerment: Training 31 experts from diverse RECs expanded the pool of knowledgeable professionals, empowering regional bodies. • Tool Familiarity: Training national experts and CAADP teams on the revised roadmap for the fourth BR report ensured their adeptness with necessary tools and processes.
sessions provided strived to standardize understanding across RECs, ensuring consistent knowledge about CAADP BR reporting tools. • Enhanced Collaboration: Bringing together experts likely fostered collaboration among CAADP BR experts and stakeholders, promoting networking opportunities. • Competency Development: Equipping national CAADP experts with requisite competencies intended to maximize effective utilization of CAADP BR reporting tools. • Efficient Implementation Facilitation: By preparing regional experts thoroughly, the outcomes aimed at streamlining the fourth CAADP Biennial Review cycle's execution. • Regional Strengthening: Empowering experts from diverse RECs aimed at fortifying regional entities with essential skills for active participation in the CAADP BR process. • Dialogue Advocacy: Promote regional dialogue to enhance awareness and understanding of the BR results among stakeholders at national and regional levels. Foster appreciation for multi- stakeholder perspectives and their roles in the BR processes, and outline key strategies and recommendations to address performance gaps at both national and regional levels.
Timeline 1) Report presentation to the Assembly of Heads of State and Governments for endorsement. Jan/Feb 2024 2) Launch of the fourth (4th) Comprehensive African Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) Biennial Review (BR) Report, at the side-lines of the Summit Jan/Feb 2024 3) Capacity building for the Media on the CAADP BR reporting 10th – 12th Feb 2024 4) Printing and Dissemination of the 4th BR Report to MS, RECs, Partners, including Media engagement. (popular/simplified versions of the report, scorecard and dashboard). March 2024 5) Training of Trainers on CAADP and Biennial Review (BR) Mechanism: Training of CAADP & BR Regional experts, Media, Communication experts to support the Post 4th BR Advocacy and Dialogue, and the 5th BR processes. March 2024 6) Dialogues (regional and national levels) on country’ performance and BR recommendations from the 4th BR Report. March – June 2024 7) Peer-to-peer learning sessions on the CAADP BR process and 4th BR report and process March – June 2024
akademiya2063
deanohume
holman
trishagee
lara
addyosmani
matthewcrist
mraible
reverentgeek
jonyablonski
destraynor
nonsquared
