identification, after other types of evidence (fingerprints, bone remains) have been analysed • Used in conjunction with anthropology and other evidence • Analysed biological remains: bone and teeth, hair, blood, semen, muscle tissue + other unusual remains
laboratory • Analysis is conducted differently according to the type of biological remain • Relying only on DNA identification is not sufficient to convict a suspect for a judge
information about a person’s possible illnesses or physical characteristics except for the Amelogenin gene • Three types of DNA according to its function: • Coding DNA: used for protein synthesis - about 20.000 genes • Regulating DNA: regulates (activates and deactivates) other genes • Non-coding (junk) DNA: we don’t know what does it do… yet
in coding DNA may cause the death or the infertility of the individual • Harmful mutations are not passed on to new generations (mostly) so coding DNA is almost the same for everyone • Mutations happening in junk DNA do not (normally) harm the individual so they get passed on to the next generation • Lots of genetic variability in junk DNA → uniqueness – Yay!
variations in one bp, used exceptionally • D-Loop: a varying fragment of mtDNA • STRs – Short Tandem Repeats: different alleles mean different numbers of repetitions
and Mrs Violet attended a party at Mr Blue’s. • That night, a corpse was found in the library at Mr. Blue’s • The identity of the body cannot be known through fingerprints due to its bad condition, but we have a presumptive identity for the body.
samples are taken from a spouse and a daughter • Profiles cannot be compared directly, a kinship study must be done – Yay! • Remember inheritance problems? • Co-dominance
known, the investigation can begin • All the attendees to the party become suspects, thorough interrogation is performed • Autopsy results show the victim, now known as Mr Green, was stabbed • Stains of blood are found in Mr Green’s hair
analysed so there is a chance that this can happen • DNA is not the only evidence • The probability of this happening can be calculated • Population genetics comes into play – Yay!
in sub-Saharan Africa is not the same as in Scandinavia • Geneticists study the frequency of each allele for each marker in the population of interest • These frequencies are slightly different for STRs in different areas, but widely vary for mtDNA and Y chromosome markers
A B AB US 44% 42% 10% 4% Spain 45% 42% 10% 3% Colombia 61% 29% 8% 2% Japan 30% 40% 20% 10% Data from Stanford University, Federación Nacional de Donantes de la Sangre, Frecuencia de grupos sanguíneos y factor Rh en donantes de sangre, Colombia ,1996; M. Beltrán et Al.
allow us to trace migrations back hundreds of thousands of years, more recent migrations can also be traced • During the colonisation of America in the 15th century, male colonists had children with female natives • mtDNA was passed by mothers, but Y chromosomes by fathers • Children have a South American mtDNA with a European Y chromosome