Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Architectures for Digital Pedagogy

Architectures for Digital Pedagogy

"Architectures for Digital Pedagogy: User - Centered and Collaborative Frameworks for Enabling Student DH Research": A keynote presentation at the "Digital Humanities and the Undergraduate Experience" symposium at Southern Illinois University - Edwardsville on April 26-27, 2019.

Harriett Green

April 27, 2019
Tweet

More Decks by Harriett Green

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. Architectures For Digital Pedagogy Harriett Green, Washington University in St.

    Louis “Digital Humanities and the Undergraduate Experience” User-Centered and Collaborative Frameworks for Enabling Student DH Research @greenharr | CC-BY-NC 1
  2. What is Digital Pedagogy “But while digital humanities may seem

    like an intimidating, exponentially growing field with varying ideas of “insiders” and “outsiders,” you and your students are all already digital humanists, because you all use technology in your daily lives. At its best, the digital humanities is about engaging more critically with the intersections between technology and how we act, think and learn.” Adeline Koh, Hybrid Pedagogy @greenharr | CC-BY-NC 2
  3. Need for Partnerships “A more mature DH institutional culture is

    one that recognizes that many forms of DH work — particularly those that involve computationally intensive and/or data - intensive analysis — are most effectively implemented through partnerships between individuals with diverse skill sets.” Building Capacity for Digital Humanities report @greenharr | CC-BY-NC 4
  4. Infrastructures Libraries are infrastructures not only because they are ubiquitous

    and persistent, but also, and primarily, because they are made of interconnected networks that undergird all that foment, that create what Pierre Bourdieu would call “structuring structures” that support Weinberger’s “messy, rich networks of people and ideas.’… Shannon Mattern @greenharr | CC-BY-NC 5
  5. Case study: Service Building • Building networks of relationships for

    sustaining digital humanities initiatives and work • Building workflows to facilitate digital humanities work by undergraduates • Service and staffing infrastructure becoming inherent to institutional functions @greenharr | CC-BY-NC 9
  6. Case study: Embedded Research • Active involvement of undergraduates in

    critical phases of the research • Build sustainable long-term research engagement • Alignment with the goals of the institution and broader research outcomes @greenharr | CC-BY-NC 14
  7. John M. Olin Library Transformation • Research Studio • DaVE

    • A/V Studio • Instructional computer classrooms @greenharr | CC-BY-NC 16
  8. Case study: Adaptive Spaces • Responsive and reflective of student

    and curricular needs • Build in sustainable avenues and resources for engagement with technology • Partner with campus stakeholders to amplify and strengthen the use of the spaces @greenharr | CC-BY-NC 17
  9. Not Just Tools  Holistic Use Digital Literacies Information Visual

    Media Cultural Critical Operational “The awareness, attitude and ability of individuals to appropriately use digital tools and facilities to identify, access, manage, integrate, evaluate, analyse and synthesize digital resources, construct new knowledge, create media expressions, and communicate with others, in the context of specific life situations, in order to enable constructive social action; and to reflect upon this process.” (Martin & Grudzecki 2010) @greenharr | CC-BY-NC 18
  10. 19 PARTNERSHIPS FOR DH PEDAGOGY Assess Continually Clarify goals and

    priorities Ensure a shared understanding of aims and mission Be flexible in approach and strategy Create plan for workflows and allocated resources Memoranda of Understanding, Service Agreement, project agreements @greenharr | CC-BY-NC
  11. References • Emblematica Online, http://emblematica.library.illinois.edu/ • Kirk, Anne, et al.

    Building Capacity for Digital Humanities: A Framework for Institutional Planning. ECAR Working Paper. May 2017. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2017/5/building-capacity- for-digital-humanities-a-framework-for-institutional-planning • Koh, Adeline. “Introducing Digital Humanities Work to Undergraduates: An Overview.” Hybrid Pedagogy. Published August 14, 2014. http://www.hybridpedagogy.com/journal/introducing- digital-humanities-work-undergraduates-overview/ • Mapping LBGTQ St. Louis, http://thedividedcity.com/mapping-lgbtq-st-louis/ • Martin, Allan and Grudziecki, Jan. “DigEuLit: Concepts and Tools for Digital Literacy Development.” Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences 5, no. 4 (2006): 249- 267. • Mattern, Shannon. “Library As Infrastructure.” Places Journal (June 2014). https://placesjournal.org/article/library-as-infrastructure/ • SourceLab, https://sourcelab.history.illinois.edu/ @greenharr | CC-BY-NC 20
  12. THANK YOU Harriett Green Associate University Librarian for Digital Scholarship

    and Technology Services, Washington University Libraries [email protected] | @greenharr @greenharr | CC-BY-NC 21