Group 14 Presentation

Transcript

1. Books’n’More By Anna Williams, Breana Whitaker, Isaiah Meyers, Payton Wilhite, Samuel Turner
2. Site map
7. Check out the ste! http://www.bookpages.me/
8. Critique of Books’n’More • What we did well: ◦ Website is well organized, clear, and practical. ◦ The purpose of each page is well defined. • What we learned: ◦ We learned to create a website with database support. To most of us, the tools employed by this project were completely new (PostgreSQL, Flask, Jinja, Bootstrap, GCP, etc). • What we could improve: ◦ Search page (organize by model, more info, ‘no results’, etc). ◦ Unit tests poorly organized. ◦ Cards/more pictures/color/polished look • What we find puzzling: ◦ API Scraping
9. Critique of Group 15 • What they did well: ◦ Good presentation on home page (cards linking to models) ◦ Updating tables in real time for search ◦ Very well presented unit test outputs. • What we learned: ◦ Unit test outputs can be made pretty ◦ A different approach to searching. • What they could improve: ◦ Not all links are clickable in the tables for each model. • What puzzles us about their website: ◦ The attributes they decided to list on instance pages and results to list in table.
10. Thank you :)
11. Demo... And Unit tests