Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
RICON West 2012: Bringing Consistency to Riak (...
Search
Joseph Blomstedt
October 30, 2013
Programming
3
780
RICON West 2012: Bringing Consistency to Riak (Part 2)
Joseph Blomstedt
October 30, 2013
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Joseph Blomstedt
See All by Joseph Blomstedt
Data Structure Adventures for Fun, Profit, and Performance
jtuple
2
350
Riak -- Seattle Scalability
jtuple
2
470
Hansei: Property-based Development of Concurrent Systems
jtuple
3
2.2k
Riak 1.2 Webinar Preview
jtuple
1
280
Test First Construction of Distributed Systems
jtuple
3
1.1k
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Denoのセキュリティに関する仕組みの紹介 (toranoana.deno #23)
uki00a
0
250
ThorVG Viewer In VS Code
nors
0
750
AI Schema Enrichment for your Oracle AI Database
thatjeffsmith
0
110
Oxlintはいいぞ
yug1224
5
1.1k
Fragmented Architectures
denyspoltorak
0
130
dchart: charts from deck markup
ajstarks
3
970
LLM Observabilityによる 対話型音声AIアプリケーションの安定運用
gekko0114
2
400
CSC307 Lecture 04
javiergs
PRO
0
650
【卒業研究】会話ログ分析によるユーザーごとの関心に応じた話題提案手法
momok47
0
180
DevFest Android in Korea 2025 - 개발자 커뮤니티를 통해 얻는 가치
wisemuji
0
190
コマンドとリード間の連携に対する脅威分析フレームワーク
pandayumi
1
410
なぜSQLはAIぽく見えるのか/why does SQL look AI like
florets1
0
350
Featured
See All Featured
Paper Plane (Part 1)
katiecoart
PRO
0
3.5k
Bioeconomy Workshop: Dr. Julius Ecuru, Opportunities for a Bioeconomy in West Africa
akademiya2063
PRO
1
47
Context Engineering - Making Every Token Count
addyosmani
9
630
Hiding What from Whom? A Critical Review of the History of Programming languages for Music
tomoyanonymous
2
380
Responsive Adventures: Dirty Tricks From The Dark Corners of Front-End
smashingmag
254
22k
Distributed Sagas: A Protocol for Coordinating Microservices
caitiem20
333
22k
CoffeeScript is Beautiful & I Never Want to Write Plain JavaScript Again
sstephenson
162
16k
Taking LLMs out of the black box: A practical guide to human-in-the-loop distillation
inesmontani
PRO
3
2k
Jess Joyce - The Pitfalls of Following Frameworks
techseoconnect
PRO
1
58
How to Align SEO within the Product Triangle To Get Buy-In & Support - #RIMC
aleyda
1
1.4k
A brief & incomplete history of UX Design for the World Wide Web: 1989–2019
jct
1
280
Conquering PDFs: document understanding beyond plain text
inesmontani
PRO
4
2.3k
Transcript
Joseph Blomstedt (@jtuple) Basho Technologies Bringing Consistency To Riak (Part
2) Tuesday, October 29, 13
CAP Theorem 2 Tuesday, October 29, 13
3 Partition-tolerance Consistency Availability Tuesday, October 29, 13
4 Partition-tolerance Consistency Availability Tuesday, October 29, 13
5 Partition-tolerance Consistency Availability CP AP Tuesday, October 29, 13
6 Partition-tolerance Consistency Availability CP AP Tuesday, October 29, 13
7 Partition-tolerance Consistency Availability CP AP Tuesday, October 29, 13
8 C/P Strict Quorum A/P Sloppy Quorum A/P Tuesday, October
29, 13
9 C/P Strict Quorum A/P Sloppy Quorum A/P Tuesday, October
29, 13
10 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node
5 client client client Tuesday, October 29, 13
11 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node
5 client client client Tuesday, October 29, 13
12 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node
5 client client client Tuesday, October 29, 13
13 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node
5 client client client Tuesday, October 29, 13
14 C/P Strict Quorum A/P Sloppy Quorum A/P Tuesday, October
29, 13
15 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node
5 client client client Tuesday, October 29, 13
16 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node
5 client client client Tuesday, October 29, 13
17 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node
5 client client client Tuesday, October 29, 13
18 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node
5 client client client Tuesday, October 29, 13
19 C/P Strict Quorum A/P Sloppy Quorum A/P Tuesday, October
29, 13
20 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node
5 client client client Tuesday, October 29, 13
21 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node
5 client client client Tuesday, October 29, 13
22 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node
5 client client client Tuesday, October 29, 13
23 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node
5 client client client Tuesday, October 29, 13
24 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node
5 client client client client client Tuesday, October 29, 13
Eventual Consistency 25 Tuesday, October 29, 13
26 A A A Tuesday, October 29, 13
27 A A A Tuesday, October 29, 13
28 A A A B Tuesday, October 29, 13
29 A A A B Tuesday, October 29, 13
30 A A A B B B B Tuesday, October
29, 13
31 A A A Tuesday, October 29, 13
32 A A A B C Tuesday, October 29, 13
33 A A A B C Tuesday, October 29, 13
34 A A A B {B,C} {B,C} {B,C} C Tuesday,
October 29, 13
35 Write Once Immutable Last Write Wins Business Rules CRDTs/Monotonicity
Tuesday, October 29, 13
36 Write Once Immutable Last Write Wins Business Rules CRDTs/Monotonicity
Tuesday, October 29, 13
37 Write Once Immutable Last Write Wins Business Rules CRDTs/Monotonicity
Tuesday, October 29, 13
38 Write Once Immutable Last Write Wins Business Rules CRDTs/Monotonicity
Tuesday, October 29, 13
39 Write Once Immutable Last Write Wins Business Rules CRDTs/Monotonicity
Tuesday, October 29, 13
40 Write Once Immutable Last Write Wins Business Rules CRDTs/Monotonicity
Tuesday, October 29, 13
Strong Consistency 41 Tuesday, October 29, 13
Strong Consistency 42 Why? Tuesday, October 29, 13
Strong Consistency 43 Recency Tuesday, October 29, 13
Strong Consistency 44 Recency Partial Writes Tuesday, October 29, 13
Strong Consistency 45 Recency Partial Writes Atomicity Tuesday, October 29,
13
46 Recency Partial Writes Atomicity Tuesday, October 29, 13
47 Recency Partial Writes Atomicity Tuesday, October 29, 13
48 Eventual consistency is great Tuesday, October 29, 13
49 But, when is eventual? Tuesday, October 29, 13
50 Do I have the most recent value? Tuesday, October
29, 13
51 CRDTs don’t help Tuesday, October 29, 13
52 (a,1) (a,1) (a,1) =1 Tuesday, October 29, 13
53 (a,1) (a,1) (a,1) Tuesday, October 29, 13
54 (a,1) +1 +3 (a,1) (a,1) (a,2) (a,1),(b,3) =2 =4
Tuesday, October 29, 13
55 (a,1) +1 +3 (a,1) (a,1) (a,2) (a,1),(b,3) Tuesday, October
29, 13
56 (a,1) +1 +3 (a,1) (a,1) (a,2) (a,1),(b,3) (a,2),(b,3) (a,2),(b,3)
(a,2),(b,3) Tuesday, October 29, 13
57 (a,1) +1 +3 (a,1) (a,1) (a,2) (a,1),(b,3) (a,2),(b,3) (a,2),(b,3)
(a,2),(b,3) =5 Tuesday, October 29, 13
58 (a,1) +1 +3 (a,1) (a,1) (a,2) (a,1),(b,3) =2 =4
Tuesday, October 29, 13
59 Recency Partial Writes Atomicity Tuesday, October 29, 13
60 A write B (fail) A A B A A
Tuesday, October 29, 13
61 B A A Tuesday, October 29, 13
62 B A A read A read A read A
Tuesday, October 29, 13
63 B A A read A read A read A
Tuesday, October 29, 13
64 B A A read A read A read A
read B Tuesday, October 29, 13
65 Recency Partial Writes Atomicity Tuesday, October 29, 13
Strong Consistency 66 Tuesday, October 29, 13
Strong Consistency 67 What does mean for Riak 2.0? Tuesday,
October 29, 13
68 Conditional single key atomic operations Tuesday, October 29, 13
69 No siblings Tuesday, October 29, 13
70 get sees most recent put Tuesday, October 29, 13
71 get/modify/put fails if object changed Tuesday, October 29, 13
72 get/modify/put fails if object changed (eg. concurrent put) Tuesday,
October 29, 13
73 puts w/o vclock fails if object exists Tuesday, October
29, 13
74 partial writes resolved on read Tuesday, October 29, 13
75 Consensus Tuesday, October 29, 13
76 Paxos Tuesday, October 29, 13
77 1RGH 1RGH
1RGH 1 SUHSDUH 1 SURPLVH 1 9 % SURPLVH 1 9 & 9 1 I 9 $ 9 % 9 & FRPPLW 1 9 1 DFFHSW 1 Tuesday, October 29, 13
78 Rinse/repeat for each request Tuesday, October 29, 13
79 2 round trips/request Tuesday, October 29, 13
80 Multi-Paxos Tuesday, October 29, 13
81 First Request Tuesday, October 29, 13
82 1RGH 1RGH
1RGH 1 , SUHSDUH 1 , SURPLVH 1 , 9 % SURPLVH 1 , 9 & 9 1 I 9 $ 9 % 9 & FRPPLW 1 , 9 1 DFFHSW 1 , Tuesday, October 29, 13
83 Each Additional Request Tuesday, October 29, 13
84 1RGH 1RGH
1RGH , FRPPLW 1 , 9 DFFHSW 1 , Tuesday, October 29, 13
85 1 round trip/request (common case) Tuesday, October 29, 13
86 Problem Shipping entire state each request is expensive Tuesday,
October 29, 13
87 Solution Paxos + Replicated Log Tuesday, October 29, 13
88 Problem Now I have N problems Tuesday, October 29,
13
89 Log recovery Log trimming Rollup Snapshots Fault Recovery Tuesday,
October 29, 13
90 Choose your own adventure... Tuesday, October 29, 13
91 Better Solution Build log replication into protocol Tuesday, October
29, 13
92 Better Solution ZK Atomic Broadcast Raft Tuesday, October 29,
13
Zab 93 Tuesday, October 29, 13
94 Tuesday, October 29, 13
95 Tuesday, October 29, 13
96 Tuesday, October 29, 13
97 Tuesday, October 29, 13
Raft 98 Tuesday, October 29, 13
99 Tuesday, October 29, 13
100 raftconsensus.github.io Tuesday, October 29, 13
101 Text Tuesday, October 29, 13
Back to Riak 102 Tuesday, October 29, 13
103 Key/Value Keys are independent Active Anti-Entropy Tunable backends Tuesday,
October 29, 13
104 Each key is independent state Tuesday, October 29, 13
105 Simple multi-paxos per key Tuesday, October 29, 13
106 1B keys = 1B consensus groups? Tuesday, October 29,
13
107 No Tuesday, October 29, 13
108 Consensus group per preflist (replica set) Tuesday, October 29,
13
109 Emulate paxos per key Tuesday, October 29, 13
Node 0 Node 1 Node 2 Tuesday, October 29, 13
111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 123 Tuesday,
October 29, 13
112 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 123 234
Tuesday, October 29, 13
113 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 123 234
345 Tuesday, October 29, 13
114 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 123 234
345 456 Tuesday, October 29, 13
115 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 123 234
345 456 567 ... Tuesday, October 29, 13
116 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 123 234
345 456 567 Ensembles ... Tuesday, October 29, 13
117 64 partition ring = 64 ensembles Tuesday, October 29,
13
118 Each Ensemble Elects leader Establishes epoch Supports get/put ops
Tuesday, October 29, 13
119 Establish a new epoch Tuesday, October 29, 13
120 1RGH 1RGH
1RGH 1 , SUHSDUH 1 , SURPLVH 1 , 9 % SURPLVH 1 , 9 & 9 1 I 9 $ 9 % 9 & FRPPLW 1 , 9 1 DFFHSW 1 , Tuesday, October 29, 13
121 consensus state epoch sequence membership leader Tuesday, October 29,
13
122 K/V objects epoch sequence key value Tuesday, October 29,
13
123 GET leader reads local object if obj.epoch old: refresh
reply w/ val Tuesday, October 29, 13
124 1RGH 1RGH
1RGH REMHSRFK HSRFK JHW .H\ UHSO\ (SRFK % 6HT % 9DO % UHSO\ (SRFK & 6HT & 9DO & 9DO ODWHVW 9DO $ 9DO % 9DO & 9DOHSRFK HSRFK ZULWH (SRFK 6HT 9DO DFN (SRFK 6HT Tuesday, October 29, 13
125 1RGH 1RGH
1RGH REMHSRFK HSRFK 5HSO\ ORFDOBJHW .H\ Tuesday, October 29, 13
126 2 roundtrips/get (worst) 0 roundtrip/get (best) Tuesday, October 29,
13
127 PUT leader reads local object if obj.epoch old: refresh
if modify(obj) false: fail commit modified obj reply ok Tuesday, October 29, 13
128 1RGH 1RGH
1RGH REMHSRFK HSRFK JHW .H\ UHSO\ (SRFK % 6HT % 9DO % UHSO\ (SRFK & 6HT & 9DO & /DWHVW ODWHVW 9DO $ 9DO % 9DO & 9DO PRGLI\ /DWHVW ZULWH (SRFK 6HT 9DO DFN (SRFK 6HT Tuesday, October 29, 13
129 1RGH 1RGH
1RGH REMHSRFK HSRFK /DWHVW ORFDOBJHW .H\ 9DO PRGLI\ /DWHVW ZULWH (SRFK 6HT 9DO DFN (SRFK 6HT Tuesday, October 29, 13
130 2 roundtrips/put (worst) 1 roundtrip/put (best) Tuesday, October 29,
13
131 Leader abandons leadership if any quorum operation ever fails
Tuesday, October 29, 13
132 Which forces new epoch to be established Tuesday, October
29, 13
133 Partial Writes Tuesday, October 29, 13
failed partial write X (2) X (2) X (2) X
(2) X (2) Y (2) epoch 2 epoch 3 Tuesday, October 29, 13
read / rewrite / reply X X (2) X (2)
Y (2) X (3) X (3) Y (2) epoch 3 epoch 3 Tuesday, October 29, 13
X (3) X (3) Y (2) X (3) X (3)
X (3) read / repair / reply X epoch 3 epoch 3 Tuesday, October 29, 13
Usage 137 Tuesday, October 29, 13
138 AP or CP per bucket type Tuesday, October 29,
13
139 consistent = true Tuesday, October 29, 13
140 $ riak-admin bucket-type create strong \ '{"props": {"consistent": true}}'
strong created Tuesday, October 29, 13
141 $ riak-admin bucket-type activate strong strong has been activated
Tuesday, October 29, 13
142 > riakc_pb_socket:get(Socket, {<<"strong">>, <<"bucket">>}, <<"key">>). {error,notfound} Tuesday, October 29,
13
143 > Obj = riakc_obj:new({<<"strong">>, <<"bucket">>}, <<"key">>, <<"1">>)). > riakc_pb_socket:put(Socket,
Obj). ok Tuesday, October 29, 13
144 > Obj2 = riakc_obj:new({<<"strong">>, <<"bucket">>}, <<"key">>, <<"2">>)). > riakc_pb_socket:put(Socket,
Obj2). {error, failed} Tuesday, October 29, 13
145 {ok, Obj3} = riakc_pb_socket:get(Socket, {<<"strong">>, <<"bucket">>}, <<"key">>). Tuesday, October
29, 13
146 Obj4 = riakc_obj:update_value(Obj3, <<"2">>). Tuesday, October 29, 13
147 Obj5 = riakc_obj:update_value(Obj3, <<"22">>). Tuesday, October 29, 13
148 > riakc_pb_socket:put(Socket, Obj4). ok Tuesday, October 29, 13
149 > riakc_pb_socket:put(Socket, Obj5). {error,<<"failed">>} Tuesday, October 29, 13
150 Your client may vary Tuesday, October 29, 13
151 Your client may vary We’re working on it Tuesday,
October 29, 13
Tech Preview 152 Tuesday, October 29, 13
153 No AAE syncing No 2i No stats Tuesday, October
29, 13
154 Will be in 2.0 final Tuesday, October 29, 13
Coming Soon 155 Tuesday, October 29, 13
156 Datatypes Multi-DC Lightweight Tx? Perf benchmarks Tuesday, October 29,
13
157 Datatypes Multi-DC Lightweight Tx? Perf benchmarks Tuesday, October 29,
13
158 Datatypes Multi-DC Lightweight Tx? Perf benchmarks Tuesday, October 29,
13
159 Datatypes Multi-DC Lightweight Tx? Perf benchmarks Tuesday, October 29,
13
160 Datatypes Multi-DC Lightweight Tx? Perf benchmarks Tuesday, October 29,
13
Questions? 161 Tuesday, October 29, 13