However, Jimmy Gurulé, a professor of law at the University of Notre
Dame Law school, who served as an expert consultant for the plaintiffs in
the Arab Bank case, and is serving in a similar role in another case, said
the verdict’s impact could be limited by the apparent egregiousness of
the facts. For example, he pointed to plaintiff allegations that Arab Bank
didn’t merely provide routine financial services to Hamas, it engaged
with a Saudi charity and the U.S.-designated group to provide benefits to
the families of suicide bombers.