Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Fight your brain: Innovate!

Zahathys
November 30, 2016
490

Fight your brain: Innovate!

PDF version of the slide deck I used at the AgileNZ conference

Zahathys

November 30, 2016
Tweet

Transcript

  1. A bit of history • 1802: Humphry Davy demonstrates an

    incandescent light • 1840: Warren de la Rue introduces the vacuum bulb • 1847: Edison is born • 1860: Joseph Swan creates a working light bulb prototype • 1878: Edison starts to work on the light bulb
  2. “Most of my ideas belonged to other people who never

    bothered to develop them.” - Thomas A. Edison -
  3. Good News: Ideas are everywhere, so you do not need

    to be creative to innovate! Bad News: Innovation is hard work!
  4. So you now have many ideas. Which ones are you

    going to try out? Is that a rational choice?
  5. • Fast • Low effort System 1 System 2 •

    Controlled • Conscious • Rule based • Abstract • Automatic • Non-conscious • Associative • Contextualized • Slow • High effort
  6. A cognitive bias is a systematic error of judgement. They

    occur because of built-in mechanisms. We are all affected by these biases. No matter our age, gender, origin or education.
  7. With which set of letters can you construct a larger

    number of words (in English)? The second one, yes. But how did you come up with that solution? 1. XUZONLCJM 2. TAPCERHOB
  8. You most likely used one of these two heuristics: However,

    did you notice this? • Availability • Substitution
  9. “We are not thinking machines that feel; rather, we are

    feeling machines that think.” - Antonio Damasio -
  10. The Mere Exposure Effect is an instance of the Availability

    Heuristic. Something new is potentially dangerous.
  11. Sure the Mere Exposure Effect will work against you because

    others are affected by it. But never forget that the first person you have to convince is you. And you too, are affected by the Mere Exposure Effect.
  12. So, be passionate; however, beware of the ... Sunk Cost

    Fallacy Tendency to take a decision based on previous costs or time invested.
  13. Imagine you inadvertently booked two ski trips for the same

    week-end. Many people will still choose to go to the first one. 1. The first costs $400 2. The second costs $200 You are quite convinced that you will enjoy the second one much more. Which one do you go to?
  14. So far is anything surprising in this talk or does

    it confirm what you already knew?
  15. Confirmation Bias We tend to favor and search for ideas

    and information that validates our existing beliefs.
  16. Let’s play a small game Here are 3 series of

    numbers: • 2, 4, 6 • 10, 12, 14 • 22, 24, 26 These 3 series are all following a rule that I have selected. To find my rule, give me some other series of numbers and I will tell you if they match my rule or not.
  17. Have you guessed my rule? Have you ever tried to

    disprove your belief? The rule was any three numbers in ascending order. You had an initial belief formed after seeing my first example.
  18. So, what is the solution? Will being aware of all

    these biases help us? No! Knowledge of biases is not enough to fight them.
  19. One way to fight these biases is to actively engage

    System 2. However, System 2 is slow and uses a lot of energy. That means that we need to deliberately allocate more time for thinking.
  20. My recipe for innovation • Start with a goal •

    Catch some ideas • Believe in them • Be ready to pivot • Keep an open-mind • Keep thinking!
  21. References Tversky, A.; Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics

    and biases. Science, 185, 4157, 1124-1131 Bechara, A.; Damasio, A.R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 336-372 Zajonc, R.B. (1968). Attitudinal Effects Of Mere Exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 9, 2, 1-27. Arkes, H.; Blumer, C. (1985). The Psychology of Sunk Cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 35, 124-140 Lord, C.G.; Ross, L.; Lepper, M.R. (1979). Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 11, 2098-2109