Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

MREH ACE Day - Health Records

Avatar for glyn1wood glyn1wood
March 08, 2017
47

MREH ACE Day - Health Records

Avatar for glyn1wood

glyn1wood

March 08, 2017

Transcript

  1. Manchester Royal Eye Hospital Health Records Special ACE Session Programme

    Whole Hospital 1:45-2:00 Registration 2:00-2:05 Opening Remarks C Fenerty 2.05-2.25 Trust Health records Road Map E Grindon 2.25-2.45 MREH Health Records Audit (methodology and results) A-M Lord and team 2.45- 3.00 Summary of HLI’s involving Health Record Issues Salim Khan 3.00 – 3.15 Comfort Break 3.15-3.35 Chameleon View Demonstration N Jones 3.35-3.50 MREH Health Records Tracking Standards H Mercer and Team 3.50-4.10 ‘Getting MREH Back on Track’ project C Fenerty 4.10-4.25 Interactive session – Prioritising what we file in the record C Fenerty/ H Mercer and team 4:25-4:30 Closing remarks C Fenerty
  2. Manchester Royal Eye Hospital Outpatient Improvement Programme – An Overview

    Health Records Patient Access Flow and Expectations Specialist Customer Care Patient Literature Clinic H Redesign
  3. BACKGROUND • Change in Informatics Senior Management prompted a review

    of all areas of Informatics. This review found the following issues relating to Health Records: – Lack of space for filing case notes – Tracking of case notes is poor – Destruction / retention review of case notes is not routinely completed (caused by poor reporting and resource issues) – Use of archive storage is not efficient – Availability of case notes can be low – Inefficiencies in the team – Low team morale
  4. DRIVERS • Ensure an accurate and complete PHR is available

    to the right person in the right place at the right time, whether that be paper or electronic • Improve the management of the Library and storage of health records • Reduce costs associated with the storage and administration of paper health records • Adherence to the standards for the management and storage of health records • Ensure actions taken as part of the Health Records Improvement Programme support the upcoming strategy for implementation of a Trust-wide EPR
  5. OUTLINE PROPOSAL • Centralise the creation of case notes to

    Health Records Team and a small number of other teams (for example A&E, Maternity, Genetics) • Introduce bar code tracking of case notes using PAS • New case notes created will use the district number as case note number – M format case note numbers will no longer be used • Re-file the library in Terminal Digit File order • Review the management of the Library and use of the space (Gorton 1, Gorton 2, 3rd Floor RMCH, Archive Storage) • Update Processes and SOP’s based on any changes arising from the above activities • Review EDMS options and produce a Business Case
  6. SCOPE / ASSUMPTIONS In Scope Out of Scope Centralise the

    creation of case notes Re-numbering of existing patient case notes Bar code tracking of case notes Development work in PAS to use DN as case note number Data quality activities around locations/borrower codes Ensuring the case note format and content meets IHRM standards Identify and agree the requirements to move all Libraries to TDF order Space review at Gorton Libraries and 3rd floor RMCH Work with Health Records and Ops Managers across the Trust to amend processes at each point of change Document revised processes using Standard Operating Procedures Amendments to staff roles as a result of process changes Short term EDMS requirements – Healthier Together, A&E, Community Long term EDMS requirements – Business case, Trafford Assumptions 1. There are no technical or process barriers that will prevent implementation of district number as case note number 2. Health Records staff will be released from their current roles at appropriate points to assist with delivery of the project activities 3. Operational staff members across the Trust will support the introduction of new processes and flag issues with proposed changes
  7. Changes to PAS to be supported by Apps Changes to

    processes to be enforced by Health Records Team and Ops Managers using audit data provided by Information Team SERVICE DESIGN (HIGH LEVEL)
  8. DELIVERY PLAN (HIGH LEVEL) Long term priority Process reviews SOPs

    EDMS Business Case Medium term priority District number as case note number Healthier Together scanning requirements A&E Scanning requirements Immediate priority Centralisation of case note creation Barcode tracking of case notes 3rd floor space review Gorton space review / TDF requirements
  9. FINANCES / FUNDING (HIGH LEVEL) • Approximately £750k allocated from

    Informatics Capital Budget • Business case required to agree level of funding and resource required
  10. Date of sign off • Programme mandate signed off at

    ISB in Nov 16 Key knowledge people • Ben Dearden / Health Records Team • Ops Managers Next steps • Complete business case for sign off FINANCES / FUNDING (HIGH LEVEL)
  11. For each patient attendance during the period 12/09/2016 to 21/09/2016

    a label was attached to a proforma and a binary assessment made on: (i) the availability of the record (ii) the quality of the record using the following Trust stipulations: • Over 5cm • Binding broken • Cover ripped • Loose records • Elastic band holding them together Methodology
  12. Sample Total appointments audited 1,614 Appointments excluded 17 (due to

    missing data) Remaining in data n = 1,597 Main appointment in module No of case notes audited A 176 B 351 C 243 D 236 E 10 G 384 H 197
  13. Results: Availability of Records Of the appointments: • 1,409 (88%)

    were conducted with the relevant medical record • 96 (6%) appointments had the wrong volume available • 96 (6%) of patients were seen on temp notes
  14. Results: Condition of Record Compliance Issue No of medical records

    % of medical records Over 5cm 235 15.9% Binding broken 242 16.4% Cover ripped 301 20.4% Loose records 361 24.4% Elastic band holding them together 218 14.7%
  15. High Level Investigations • MREH & Dental Hospital (Jan 2015

    – March 2017) • Total Investigations = 48 • Severity • Moderate = 13 • Major = 35 • Actual Impact • No Harm = 31 • Slight = 3 • Moderate = 8 • Major = 6
  16. High Level Investigations • Investigations related to Health Records =

    5 • Severity • Moderate = 2 • Major = 3 • Actual Impact • No Harm = 3 • Moderate = 1 • Major = 1 • Main Cause • Missing Records • Poor Condition of Records • Misfiled Records • Stolen / Lost Paperwork • Communication (Failure within team)
  17. Reported Incidents • Total Incidents – Health Records = 271

    • Department • Admin & Clerical Inpatients - 34 • Day Case Unit / Pre Admission - 8 • Altrincham - 10 • Optometry - 16 • Orthoptics - 118 • Outpatients - 28 • Ward 55 - 26 • Withington - 11 • MTC, Theatre Scrub
  18. Reported Incidents • Main Cause • Misfiled Documentation = 63

    • Mislabelled Documentation = 37 • Delay in Obtaining Record = 15 • No Access to Records = 70 • Poor Condition of Records = 88 • Missing Referral Letter = 8 • Severity • Low = 110 • Minor = 55 • Moderate = 106
  19. Description of an HLI • Patient Background • 54 yr,

    Male, Uveitis and Glaucoma team since 2006 • Left Advance Glaucoma • Right Glaucoma Surgery • Incident Detection • Pt attending a Uveitis clinic, noted ↑IOP and ↓VA • No appointment by Glaucoma team for 4 months • VA in only seeing eye deteriorated to NPL
  20. What Happened? • Right Glaucoma surgery in April 2016 and

    weekly appointments • Review appointment was now more than 3 months overdue • Booked for an urgent appointment with the Glaucoma team which he did not attend • Seen in the Uveitis clinic a month later, still no Glaucoma review, had laser treatment • Reviewed by Glaucoma team next day, VA was PL
  21. What was found? • Full medical record was not always

    available • resulting in gaps of knowledge for the reviewing clinician • clinical information continued to be recorded out of order in the medical record • When temps were merged in the medical record • records were then not able to be filed sequentially • made it more difficult for the reviewing clinician to understand the clinical picture
  22. • Communication issues • not a formal communication route between

    clinical specialties • failure of communication between clinical and administrative teams • Actions taken following a DNA • were not recorded in the medical record or on PAS
  23. Manchester Royal Eye Hospital Tracking Standards Tracking Rules: • All

    notes must be tracked when moving between locations • Always check AEQ and EPA before tracking notes back to file. Notes of patients who have a clinic appointment or surgery date anywhere in the Trust within 2 weeks must be sent on to the relevant department and not back to file • Always provide a contact number when tracking
  24. Manchester Royal Eye Hospital Tracking Standards Borrower codes Individuals: •

    CHFE: Cecilia Fenerty • FDSSEC: F D Scala secretary Locations: • EYEH – Eye H, Ground floor OPD • 55 – Ward 55 If you need a borrower code creating – please contact Carol McCormack on 0161 275 6807
  25. Why do we have so many missing records resulting in

    temporary files? • Records not tracked properly • Notes returned to file when another patient episode is imminent
  26. Consequences • Poor patient care • Additional stress/responsibility for clinicians

    • Wasted time for administrative and clerical staff • Compounding health records issues with temporary notes
  27. What can we do? • Keep track of all our

    records • Minimise need to file additional paperwork ‘Getting MREH Back on Track’
  28. Keeping Track of our records • All clinicians will now

    have a tracking code • All admin and/or secretarial staff will be happy to track notes for clinicians if asked • Any clinician wishing to have their own access to PAS in order to track to request via Carol McCormack
  29. What needs to be tracked? • Notes taken from clinic

    to: – Your office for chasing results – Admissions to give urgent date for surgery – To Daycase/ward for admission for theatre • Notes passed from one clinician to another as referral or for opinion
  30. What needs to be tracked? • Records held for audit

    • Records held for research • Records held for HLI/medico-legal/complaint/ report • Records required for GP or patient query • Records required for safeguarding • EVERYTHING!
  31. Keep Track of our Records • Lead time for record

    return and filing at Gorton = 1 week • Lead time for record retrieval from Gorton = 1 week – Any records for patients with another episode booked within 2 weeks should have to notes tracked and sent to the next venue
  32. Think! • In OPD – Is patient on regular post-op

    OPA review? – Is patient due to see other subspecialty? – Is patient due for surgery/ pre-op assessment? – Are you sending a letter to a colleague who is likely to want to review the records? • In the ward (esp childrens’ ward) – do the staff know pt is returning soon? • In the office – are there any other imminent episodes on PAS?
  33. Getting Back on Track 10 day journey • 10 days

    to get ‘on track’ • Any records required for an episode within 2 weeks should be tracked and sent to the next venue • Outside clinical areas… • Think about offices, filing cabinets/ staff rooms etc • What records are being held and why? • Any records required for valid reason should be tracked • Any records required elsewhere for an episode within 2 weeks should be tracked and sent to the next venue • Anything not required should be given to a clerk or secretary who can track them back to file
  34. Amnesty! • Any notes found which have been held for

    any length of time for any reason can be returned to a member of clerical staff to track back to file • Amnesty cage available on 4th floor reception for any embarrassing finds! – No questions asked!
  35. Getting Back on Track • 10 days Journey to Ground

    Zero • Aims have 100% records held within MREH accurately tracked • Aims to have only ‘necessary’ records held on the premises
  36. ‘Clean Sweep’ • Clean Sweep performed after this will highlight

    non-compliant records • Every room in every area will be searched • ‘Clean Areas’ marked • Non-compliant records – Will be tracked back to file – Will be added to log to feed back to individuals if necessary
  37. After ‘Ground Zero’ Day • Spot checks to ensure continued

    compliance • Feedback to individuals regarding their compliance – Recognition of good practice – Encouraging improved practice if required
  38. Results • Improvement in availability of records for patient episodes

    – audit • Find case records which have been deemed ‘lost’ to reconcile them with current record or temps • Improve our position to take advantage of Trust Road Map for Record Improvement
  39. Getting Back on Track • 10 days Journey to Ground

    Zero • Aims have 100% records held within MREH accurately tracked • Aims to have only ‘necessary’ records held on the premises • Thank you