Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
How Does Contributors' Involvement Influence th...
Search
Gustavo Pinto
January 14, 2018
0
150
How Does Contributors' Involvement Influence the Build Status of an Open-Source Software Project?
Gustavo Pinto
January 14, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Gustavo Pinto
See All by Gustavo Pinto
Developer Experiences with a Contextualized AI Coding Assistant: Usability Expectations, and Outcomes
gustavopinto
0
11
Apoiando pessoas programadoras com deficiência: Lições aprendidas na Zup Innovation
gustavopinto
0
59
5 coisas que todo dev deveria saber Para criar aplicações com GenAI
gustavopinto
0
71
Large Language Models for Education: Grading Open-Ended Questions Using ChatGPT
gustavopinto
0
85
Cognitive Driven Development: A Research Agenda
gustavopinto
0
84
The Infinite Academic Game
gustavopinto
0
46
[ESEM 2022] To What Extent Cognitive Driven Development Improves Code Readability
gustavopinto
0
93
Caminhos e desafios para a pesquisa em Computação (ou como se manter produtivo) na Região Norte
gustavopinto
2
290
How Open is the SBES PC Community
gustavopinto
0
91
Featured
See All Featured
Rails Girls Zürich Keynote
gr2m
94
13k
Measuring & Analyzing Core Web Vitals
bluesmoon
5
210
A designer walks into a library…
pauljervisheath
205
24k
Improving Core Web Vitals using Speculation Rules API
sergeychernyshev
3
180
A better future with KSS
kneath
238
17k
A Philosophy of Restraint
colly
203
16k
Designing Experiences People Love
moore
139
23k
Producing Creativity
orderedlist
PRO
343
39k
Designing for Performance
lara
604
68k
Optimizing for Happiness
mojombo
376
70k
For a Future-Friendly Web
brad_frost
176
9.5k
VelocityConf: Rendering Performance Case Studies
addyosmani
327
24k
Transcript
Marcel Rebouças How Does Contributors’ Involvement Influence the Build Status
of an Open-Source Software Project? Renato Olivera Gustavo Pinto Fernando Castor
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Motivation (1/3) Casual contributors represent a large part of the
OSS community (49%) and their contributions are far from trivial.
Motivation (2/3) Only 20% of the new contributors on OSS
projects become long-term members.
Motivation (3/3) Lack of awareness and guidance during their first
steps makes it hard to contribute!
They have little or no prior knowledge on the project
domain Casual Contributors They might put more effort to create their first pull- request
Are casual contributors more prone to create a failing build?
Research Question
Methodology TravisTorrent TravisCI CI Build Data Commiter Data Dataset Dataset
without duplicated users User Disambiguation Technique Data Cleaning Dataset with 1,074 curated projects Data Processing Data Statistical Tests
Data Overview 1,074 projects 35,360 users 619,370 builds
Data Overview # Users 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 Builds
1 2 3 4 5+ 0 150000 300000 450000 600000 Casual Non-Casual 1,074 projects 35,360 users 619,370 builds # Builds
Results 0 250 500 750 1000 No difference Higher Casual
Success Lower Casual Success Being a casual contributor is not a strong indicator for creating failing builds # Number of Projects
0 22.5 45 67.5 90 0 1.15 2.3 3.45 4.6
Results Casual contributions are smaller, both in modified source-code lines and modified files Median of Modified LoC Median of Modified Files
0 1.15 2.3 3.45 4.6 No difference Higher Casual Success
Lower Casual Success Results Projects in which casuals fail more than non-casuals run more jobs per build. Median of jobs per build
Take-Away Message Are you a casual contributor?
Take-Away Message Are you a casual contributor? Go ahead and
contribute!
None
None
None
None
[email protected]
@gustavopinto