Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
How Does Contributors' Involvement Influence th...
Search
Gustavo Pinto
January 14, 2018
0
170
How Does Contributors' Involvement Influence the Build Status of an Open-Source Software Project?
Gustavo Pinto
January 14, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Gustavo Pinto
See All by Gustavo Pinto
Developer Experiences with a Contextualized AI Coding Assistant: Usability Expectations, and Outcomes
gustavopinto
0
33
Apoiando pessoas programadoras com deficiência: Lições aprendidas na Zup Innovation
gustavopinto
0
75
5 coisas que todo dev deveria saber Para criar aplicações com GenAI
gustavopinto
0
92
Large Language Models for Education: Grading Open-Ended Questions Using ChatGPT
gustavopinto
0
100
Cognitive Driven Development: A Research Agenda
gustavopinto
0
110
The Infinite Academic Game
gustavopinto
0
67
[ESEM 2022] To What Extent Cognitive Driven Development Improves Code Readability
gustavopinto
0
100
Caminhos e desafios para a pesquisa em Computação (ou como se manter produtivo) na Região Norte
gustavopinto
2
330
How Open is the SBES PC Community
gustavopinto
0
110
Featured
See All Featured
Become a Pro
speakerdeck
PRO
29
5.5k
[Rails World 2023 - Day 1 Closing Keynote] - The Magic of Rails
eileencodes
36
2.5k
Scaling GitHub
holman
463
140k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
53
7.8k
Navigating Team Friction
lara
189
15k
Refactoring Trust on Your Teams (GOTO; Chicago 2020)
rmw
34
3.1k
A Modern Web Designer's Workflow
chriscoyier
696
190k
RailsConf & Balkan Ruby 2019: The Past, Present, and Future of Rails at GitHub
eileencodes
139
34k
Dealing with People You Can't Stand - Big Design 2015
cassininazir
367
27k
実際に使うSQLの書き方 徹底解説 / pgcon21j-tutorial
soudai
PRO
188
55k
Into the Great Unknown - MozCon
thekraken
40
2k
Designing for Performance
lara
610
69k
Transcript
Marcel Rebouças How Does Contributors’ Involvement Influence the Build Status
of an Open-Source Software Project? Renato Olivera Gustavo Pinto Fernando Castor
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Motivation (1/3) Casual contributors represent a large part of the
OSS community (49%) and their contributions are far from trivial.
Motivation (2/3) Only 20% of the new contributors on OSS
projects become long-term members.
Motivation (3/3) Lack of awareness and guidance during their first
steps makes it hard to contribute!
They have little or no prior knowledge on the project
domain Casual Contributors They might put more effort to create their first pull- request
Are casual contributors more prone to create a failing build?
Research Question
Methodology TravisTorrent TravisCI CI Build Data Commiter Data Dataset Dataset
without duplicated users User Disambiguation Technique Data Cleaning Dataset with 1,074 curated projects Data Processing Data Statistical Tests
Data Overview 1,074 projects 35,360 users 619,370 builds
Data Overview # Users 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 Builds
1 2 3 4 5+ 0 150000 300000 450000 600000 Casual Non-Casual 1,074 projects 35,360 users 619,370 builds # Builds
Results 0 250 500 750 1000 No difference Higher Casual
Success Lower Casual Success Being a casual contributor is not a strong indicator for creating failing builds # Number of Projects
0 22.5 45 67.5 90 0 1.15 2.3 3.45 4.6
Results Casual contributions are smaller, both in modified source-code lines and modified files Median of Modified LoC Median of Modified Files
0 1.15 2.3 3.45 4.6 No difference Higher Casual Success
Lower Casual Success Results Projects in which casuals fail more than non-casuals run more jobs per build. Median of jobs per build
Take-Away Message Are you a casual contributor?
Take-Away Message Are you a casual contributor? Go ahead and
contribute!
None
None
None
None
[email protected]
@gustavopinto