Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Making Scores with HiScore
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Hakka Labs
February 13, 2015
Programming
3.5k
0
Share
Making Scores with HiScore
Video here:
Hakka Labs
February 13, 2015
More Decks by Hakka Labs
See All by Hakka Labs
New Workflows for Building Data Pipelines
hakka_labs
0
2.9k
Collaborative Topic Models for Users and Texts
hakka_labs
0
2.8k
Groupcache with Evan Owen
hakka_labs
2
5.4k
Testing Android at Spotify
hakka_labs
1
4.5k
It's Not a Bug, It's a Feature!
hakka_labs
0
3.2k
K-means Clustering to Understand Your Users
hakka_labs
0
2k
Building Amy: The Email-based Virtual Assistant by x.ai
hakka_labs
0
5k
Deep Learning and NLP Applications
hakka_labs
3
13k
Go and the Gophers
hakka_labs
2
11k
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Spec-Driven Development with AI-Agents: From High-Level Requirements to Working Software
antonarhipov
2
410
作って学ぶ、 JSX (TSX) ランタイムの基本
syumai
7
1.4k
TSKaigi 2026 TypeScriptバックエンドのオブザーバビリティ戦略 — Datadog × NestJSの実践
taiseiyamamotoan
1
210
新規プロダクトを高速で生み出すハーネスエンジニアリング
seanchas116
19
7.7k
脅威をエンジニアリングの糧にして――現場編 / Turning Threats into Engineering Fuel — Field Edition
nrslib
0
220
ユニットテストの先へ:テスト技法で要求・仕様を整理するJava開発実践 / Beyond_Unit_Testing_Practical_Java_Development_Techniques_for_Organizing_Requirements_and_Specifications
shimashima35
0
310
AI時代のUIはどこへ行く?その2!
yusukebe
18
5.8k
Inside Stream API
skrb
1
480
AIチームを指揮するOSS「TAKT」活用術 / How to Use “TAKT,” an OSS Tool for Orchestrating AI Teams
nrslib
6
760
JavaDoc 再入門
nagise
0
230
The Arts and Crafts of Work in the AI Era — Toward Mastery in Software Development
kuranuki
1
690
PHPで使える日時の表現と、その知り方 #frontend_phpcon_do
o0h
PRO
0
160
Featured
See All Featured
Ruling the World: When Life Gets Gamed
codingconduct
0
240
GraphQLの誤解/rethinking-graphql
sonatard
75
12k
VelocityConf: Rendering Performance Case Studies
addyosmani
333
25k
The Art of Programming - Codeland 2020
erikaheidi
57
14k
Optimising Largest Contentful Paint
csswizardry
37
3.7k
Gemini Prompt Engineering: Practical Techniques for Tangible AI Outcomes
mfonobong
2
420
Self-Hosted WebAssembly Runtime for Runtime-Neutral Checkpoint/Restore in Edge–Cloud Continuum
chikuwait
0
560
Performance Is Good for Brains [We Love Speed 2024]
tammyeverts
12
1.7k
The Straight Up "How To Draw Better" Workshop
denniskardys
239
140k
AI Search: Implications for SEO and How to Move Forward - #ShenzhenSEOConference
aleyda
1
1.3k
Jess Joyce - The Pitfalls of Following Frameworks
techseoconnect
PRO
1
160
Chasing Engaging Ingredients in Design
codingconduct
0
200
Transcript
Making Scores with HiScore Abe Othman
None
None
None
None
HiScore is a python library for creating and maintaining scores
It uses a novel quasi-Kriging solution to a new methodology,
supervised scoring
What are scores?
Scores are a tool for domain experts to communicate their
expertise to a broad audience
88 51 27
} 58 Score Function Dimensions Score
There is no one correct scoring function
Scores are typically developed using the dual approach
1. Select a set of basis functions f(x ⃗) =
∑ γᵢφᵢ(x ⃗)
2. Adjust coefficients until things look right f(x ⃗) =
∑ γᵢφᵢ(x ⃗)
Dual scores ossify
Walkscore Problems Score of 100, but the highest crime in
SF
Supervised scoring: a primal approach
Experts start by labeling a reference set and the objects’
dimensions
Algorithm makes a scoring function that interpolates and obeys the
monotone relationship
Some nice features
Monotonicity is important for score acceptance and understanding
See a mis-scored point? Add it to the reference set
and re-run!
OK, but what algorithm?
Easy in one dimension
None
None
None
Hard in many dimensions
Failed approach: simplical interpolation
None
Failed approach: B-spline product bases
Supervised Scoring with Monotone Multidimensional Splines, AAAI 2014
Curse of dimensionality!
None
None
None
Failed approach: RBF with monotone row generation constraints
Failed approach: Neural Networks
None
None
Success: Beliakov
Reminder: Lipschitz Continuity |f(a)-f(b)| < C |a-b|
None
Monotone Lipschitz continuity
None
1. Project monotone Lipschitz cones from each point to generate
upper and lower bounds
2. Find the sup and inf constraints from the bounding
cones
3. Function value is halfway in-between the sup and inf
bounds
Beliakov example
Beliakov plateaux
Beliakov plateaux
How can we smooth and improve this?
Abandon Lipschitz, just project minimal cones from each point
None
`
HiScore solution
Using HiScore: Simplified Water Well Score
None
None
Two factors: Distance from nearest latrine and platform size
Label a reference set by taking high, middle and low
values in each dimension
Distance: 0m, 10m, 50m Size: 1SF, 25SF, 100SF
Score Distance Size 0 0 1 5 0 25 10
0 100 20 10 1 50 10 25 60 10 100 65 50 1 90 50 25 100 50 100 Monotone Relationship: (+, +)
import hiscore reference_set = {(0,1): 0, (0,25): 5, (0,100): 10,
(10,1): 20, (10,25): 50, … } mono_rel = [1,1] hiscore.create(reference_set, mono_rel, minval=0, maxval=100)
None
Complicate the model with additional factors
Avoid curse of dimensionality by building a tree
None
Possible to easily construct and understand scores with dozens of
input dimensions
Making dimensions monotone: blood pressure
None
S+ > 0 S- = 0 D+ > 0 D-
= 0 D+ = 0 D- > 0 S+ = 0 S- > 0
What do you want to score? github.com/aothman/ hiscore $ pip
install hiscore
Thanks!
[email protected]