Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Rust.Tokyo 2021: How Rust triages regressions a...

Yuki Okushi
September 18, 2021

Rust.Tokyo 2021: How Rust triages regressions and prevents them from reaching to stable

Yuki Okushi

September 18, 2021
Tweet

Other Decks in Technology

Transcript

  1. Yuki Okushi - Rust contributor - Work at Huawei -

    Working on diagnostics and some docs (Rustnomicon, rustc-dev-guide, ...) - Maintaining some crates (libc, actix-*, ...) - A member of prioritization WG
  2. Rust’s release channels - Rust has three release channels -

    Stable - Beta - Nightly - Usually, people use Stable, or Nightly (for unstable and/or latest changes) - So, when is Beta used?
  3. What are the different types of regressions? - Correctness changes

    (ICE, miscompilation, ...) - Performance changes (binary size, memory usage, ...) - Rustdoc-related - ...
  4. Regression types - regression-from-stable-to-nightly: exists only on nightly - regression-from-stable-to-beta:

    exists on beta - regression-from-stable-to-stable: exists on stable😱 - We should definitely prevent this!
  5. How to find? 1. Run `cargo check/build/test` and some tools

    (Clippy, Rustdoc) to a number of crates available on crates.io and GitHub 2. Compare the results with the latest Stable (or the current master branch if it’s PR)
  6. Example case: #82565 - Found one crate’s build failed -

    Confirmed it was fixed on newer version - The team confirmed that the change was safe → The PR has been merged with less pain
  7. Rustc's compile-time issue - Rustc is slow to compile (as

    you know) - Well, don’t the team care about it? → Yes, there are some effort!
  8. Performance monitoring - perf.rust-lang.org - Run benchmarks on all the

    merged PRs - Triage them every week - Run benchmarks on perf-sensitive PRs before merging
  9. Regression triage - We’ve been doing our best but we

    cannot reduce the number of regressions to 0. - What should we do if we find them? → This is where the Prioritization WG comes in!
  10. What’s the prioritization working group? - Prioritize the regressions reported

    on GitHub issue tracker - Monitor critical ones not to slip out - Nominate some of them to t-compiler meetings if necessary - ...so that we do not ship regressions to stable mistakenly More details about WG can be found here
  11. Priority levels - Critical - A release blocker, must be

    resolved/discussed until next release (e.g. unsound issue) - High - Not a blocker but should be resolved/triaged ASAP (e.g. working -> broken regression) - Medium - Low
  12. How to contribute it? Prioritization WG welcomes everyone! - How

    to participate? Can I actually contribute? - Anyone can join the Zulip stream and say “Hi”! - See this blog post for more details
  13. Other ways: “Cleanup Crew” - Prepare Minimal Complete and Verifiable

    Example (MCVE) - Bisect a commit or nightly that introduced a regression - Find related/duplicate issues if exists More details can be found here
  14. Other ways: Use Rust - Everyone could find a regression

    by using Rust. - Report it to the issue tracker if you find it and have some time Early reporting allows contributors more (earlier) time to work on a fix 🚢
  15. How to create a great bug report? - Fill out

    the issue template as possible - Try the latest Nightly if you’re on Stable or an old Nightly - MCVE would be helpful! - There’s a useful blog post by Felix S Klock II - Backtrace would also be helpful
  16. Conclusion - Rust has several ways to prevent regressions -

    Crater, performance monitoring, prioritization WG - The discussion is open - Everyone can read a log and leave a comment - Prioritizing is one of good ways to get your feet wet at contributing