use of their information External pressures to share more information including personal confidential information It’s not about technology Caldicott Review – Why?
better utilised to support the care of individuals & the wider population – that information governance needs to enable this sharing whilst also protecting individuals’ confidentiality and respecting their wishes Panel: – 15 members participating as independent individuals – able to represent the views/issues from their sector
heard Strong support for – more sharing of information to support their care – anonymous data to be used “for the public good” – research but plea to be asked before information is used Antipathy to their identifiable information being used for other purposes No surprises and the complex area when carers are involved
reputation Causes: – The Caldicott principles especially number 4 – Large fines from ICO for data breaches – Greater awareness of data protection – More care pathways cross organisational boundaries Increased caution among health & care professionals
of choice Concerns about sharing information between health and social care causing problems where teams interface Sharing with independent/third sector problematic Families are treated differently in health and social care Rules and Guidance are all different – and creating confusion Training not fit for purpose for all Rules go beyond Caldicott principles
balance the risks of failure to maintain confidentiality, and failure to share Simplify information governance, and for it to be seen as more closely aligned to clinical governance, not as a technical issue