Giving a Good Talk

Some slides about slides.

Transcript

1. Sample Slides Kieran Healy kjhealy@soc.duke.edu
2. Sample Slides
3. 1 Be brief. 2 Be clear. 3 Be human. Sample Slides
4. Big and Condensed 1
5. Don’t write your talk on the Slides
6. Build a Case 2
7. Predicted Change in Overall PGR Score UK Canada ANZ Total Faculty (16:26) Medvl/Religion (3:4) Continental (3:4) 17th/18th (3:4) Ancient (3:4) All Logic (3:4) Kant/Idealism (3:4) Political (3:4) All Ethics (3:4) Epistemology (3:4) All Science (3:4) MML (3:4) −0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Present Your Models in Graphs, not Tables
8. Results are complex. Help your audience. Kant/Idealism 20th C. Continental 19th C. Continental 17th Century 18th Century Medieval Ancient Religion Art Feminist Law Political Action Ethics Metaethics CogSci Mind Epistemology Language Metaphysics Math MathLogic PhilLogic Biology Decision Theory Social Science Physics Science 1.0 0.5 0.0 −0.5 −1.0 −1.5 Spearman ρ ρ2
9. Results are complex. Help your audience. Kant/Idealism 20th C. Continental 19th C. Continental 17th Century 18th Century Medieval Ancient Religion Art Feminist Law Political Action Ethics Metaethics CogSci Mind Epistemology Language Metaphysics Math MathLogic PhilLogic Biology Decision Theory Social Science Physics Science 1.0 0.5 0.0 −0.5 −1.0 −1.5 Spearman ρ ρ2 Contemporary / Insulated Historical / Low-Tech / Boundary Contemporary / High-Tech / Boundary
10. Results are complex. Help your audience. Kant/Idealism 20th C. Continental 19th C. Continental 17th Century 18th Century Medieval Ancient Religion Art Feminist Law Political Action Ethics Metaethics CogSci Mind Epistemology Language Metaphysics Math MathLogic PhilLogic Biology Decision Theory Social Science Physics Science 1.0 0.5 0.0 −0.5 −1.0 −1.5 Spearman ρ ρ2 Contemporary / Insulated Historical / Low-Tech / Boundary Contemporary / High-Tech / Boundary Low-Tech High-Tech
11. Political Ethics Epistemology Mind Language Metaphysics Continental Mdvl/Relig Kant 17th/18th Ancient Science
12. Political Ethics Epistemology Mind Language Metaphysics Continental Mdvl/Relig Kant 17th/18th Ancient Science
13. Chicago Berkeley Pittsburgh NYU Michigan North Carolina Harvard Rutgers Princeton Oxford Columbia Stanford UCLA MIT Small Multiples let you show more. But then focus on particulars. ws Yale Cornell Brown USC Birkbeck U Mass Wisconsin Ohio State Penn Sydney UC Riverside LSE is Western Ontario UIC Political Ethics Epistemology Mind Language Metaphysics Continental Mdvl/Relig Kant 17th/18th Ancient Science NYU Rutgers Oxford Princeton Michigan Pittsburgh Stanford UCLA MIT Harvard Columbia North Carolina Berkeley St. Andrews−Stirling Arizona ANU Toronto Cambridge Notre Dame Texas St. Andrews Yale Cornell Brown USC UC San Diego UC Irvine Chicago UCL CUNY Birkbeck U Mass Wisconsin Ohio State Sheffield King's Coll Maryland Indiana Duke Penn Sydney UC Riverside LSE Colorado Syracuse Miami Melbourne UC Davis Western Ontario UIC
14. MIT Pittsburgh NYU Michigan North Carolina Harvard Rutgers Princeton UCLA Oxford Columbia Stanford Cornell Brown USC UC San Diego UC Irvine U Mass Wisconsin Ohio State Sheffield King's Coll Sydney UC Riverside LSE Colorado Syracuse UIC Political Ethics Epistemology Mind Language Metaphysics Continental Mdvl/Relig Kant 17th/18th Ancient Science
15. Nearly There 3
16. If you must show a table, make it clear Status Rank Block # Mean # of Raters Median Faculty % Total Ph.Ds Mean Votes Rcvd Mean PGR Score # Depts in Block 1 1 6.5 25.5 38 197 4.6 6 2 2 4.4 19 54 194 3.7 24 3 5 2.6 17.5 6 172 2.9 22 4 4 1.7 15.5 1 158 2.5 12 5 3 1.6 15.5 0 129 1.8 8
17. Status of Voter relative to Department rated Vote Difference from Median Score + + 0 - 0 - Build up ideas
18. Status of Voter relative to Department rated Vote Difference from Median Score + + 0 - 0 - Status Distance Deviation from Consensus Build up ideas
20. - + 0 1. Pure Objectivity. 2. Distant Envy. 3. Local Competition. - + 0 Status Distance Deviation
21. 1 Summary 2 3