Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Torts: class 8
Search
kstreseman
September 12, 2018
0
27
Torts: class 8
kstreseman
September 12, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by kstreseman
See All by kstreseman
Torts: class 22
kstreseman
1
31
Torts: class 21
kstreseman
0
30
Torts: class 20
kstreseman
0
46
Torts: class 19
kstreseman
0
100
Torts: class 18
kstreseman
0
53
Torts: class 17
kstreseman
0
41
Torts: class 16
kstreseman
0
92
Torts: class 15
kstreseman
0
33
Torts: class 14
kstreseman
0
20
Featured
See All Featured
How to train your dragon (web standard)
notwaldorf
96
6.2k
The World Runs on Bad Software
bkeepers
PRO
70
11k
Facilitating Awesome Meetings
lara
55
6.5k
"I'm Feeling Lucky" - Building Great Search Experiences for Today's Users (#IAC19)
danielanewman
229
22k
Evolution of real-time – Irina Nazarova, EuRuKo, 2024
irinanazarova
8
920
Save Time (by Creating Custom Rails Generators)
garrettdimon
PRO
32
1.5k
Large-scale JavaScript Application Architecture
addyosmani
512
110k
Rebuilding a faster, lazier Slack
samanthasiow
83
9.2k
Product Roadmaps are Hard
iamctodd
PRO
54
11k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
96
6.6k
Unsuck your backbone
ammeep
671
58k
I Don’t Have Time: Getting Over the Fear to Launch Your Podcast
jcasabona
33
2.4k
Transcript
CLASS 8 DEFENSES TO INTENTIONAL TORTS ▸ Overview ▸ Consent
▸ Standard & effect ▸ Limitations ▸ Exceeding the scope ▸ Fraud ▸ Defense of self and others
REVIEW: INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ▸ Act: ∆ engages
in extreme & outrageous conduct ▸ Intent: intended to cause π distress / reckless indifference; i.e., acted even though knew or should have known would cause distress ▸ Causation: that causes π to suffer ▸ Result: severe emotional distress
CONSENT: McQuiggan v. Boy Scouts of America
CONSENT PROBLEMS P. 126
SCOPE OF CONSENT ▸ Koffman v. Garnett ▸ Problems pp.
129-130
DEFEATING THE DEFENSE: CONSENT VITIATED BY FRAUD ▸ Contrasting STD
cases ▸ Hogan v. Tavel ▸ McPherson v. McPherson ▸ Problems pp. 133-134