Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Torts: class 8
Search
kstreseman
September 12, 2018
0
23
Torts: class 8
kstreseman
September 12, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by kstreseman
See All by kstreseman
Torts: class 22
kstreseman
1
26
Torts: class 21
kstreseman
0
26
Torts: class 20
kstreseman
0
41
Torts: class 19
kstreseman
0
80
Torts: class 18
kstreseman
0
49
Torts: class 17
kstreseman
0
36
Torts: class 16
kstreseman
0
59
Torts: class 15
kstreseman
0
26
Torts: class 14
kstreseman
0
15
Featured
See All Featured
Done Done
chrislema
178
15k
Git: the NoSQL Database
bkeepers
PRO
422
63k
Code Review Best Practice
trishagee
55
15k
Understanding Cognitive Biases in Performance Measurement
bluesmoon
7
1k
Designing Experiences People Love
moore
136
23k
Become a Pro
speakerdeck
PRO
11
4.5k
How to train your dragon (web standard)
notwaldorf
73
5.2k
Automating Front-end Workflow
addyosmani
1356
200k
Learning to Love Humans: Emotional Interface Design
aarron
267
39k
Building a Modern Day E-commerce SEO Strategy
aleyda
17
6.4k
[RailsConf 2023] Rails as a piece of cake
palkan
23
3.9k
Rebuilding a faster, lazier Slack
samanthasiow
73
8.2k
Transcript
CLASS 8 DEFENSES TO INTENTIONAL TORTS ▸ Overview ▸ Consent
▸ Standard & effect ▸ Limitations ▸ Exceeding the scope ▸ Fraud ▸ Defense of self and others
REVIEW: INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ▸ Act: ∆ engages
in extreme & outrageous conduct ▸ Intent: intended to cause π distress / reckless indifference; i.e., acted even though knew or should have known would cause distress ▸ Causation: that causes π to suffer ▸ Result: severe emotional distress
CONSENT: McQuiggan v. Boy Scouts of America
CONSENT PROBLEMS P. 126
SCOPE OF CONSENT ▸ Koffman v. Garnett ▸ Problems pp.
129-130
DEFEATING THE DEFENSE: CONSENT VITIATED BY FRAUD ▸ Contrasting STD
cases ▸ Hogan v. Tavel ▸ McPherson v. McPherson ▸ Problems pp. 133-134