Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Torts: class 8
Search
kstreseman
September 12, 2018
0
27
Torts: class 8
kstreseman
September 12, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by kstreseman
See All by kstreseman
Torts: class 22
kstreseman
1
32
Torts: class 21
kstreseman
0
31
Torts: class 20
kstreseman
0
49
Torts: class 19
kstreseman
0
110
Torts: class 18
kstreseman
0
56
Torts: class 17
kstreseman
0
44
Torts: class 16
kstreseman
0
100
Torts: class 15
kstreseman
0
34
Torts: class 14
kstreseman
0
21
Featured
See All Featured
Build your cross-platform service in a week with App Engine
jlugia
234
18k
Design of three-dimensional binary manipulators for pick-and-place task avoiding obstacles (IECON2024)
konakalab
0
350
Designing for Performance
lara
610
70k
[RailsConf 2023 Opening Keynote] The Magic of Rails
eileencodes
31
9.9k
jQuery: Nuts, Bolts and Bling
dougneiner
65
8.4k
End of SEO as We Know It (SMX Advanced Version)
ipullrank
3
3.9k
A brief & incomplete history of UX Design for the World Wide Web: 1989–2019
jct
1
300
Large-scale JavaScript Application Architecture
addyosmani
515
110k
How to Grow Your eCommerce with AI & Automation
katarinadahlin
PRO
0
110
The browser strikes back
jonoalderson
0
370
Stop Working from a Prison Cell
hatefulcrawdad
273
21k
Prompt Engineering for Job Search
mfonobong
0
160
Transcript
CLASS 8 DEFENSES TO INTENTIONAL TORTS ▸ Overview ▸ Consent
▸ Standard & effect ▸ Limitations ▸ Exceeding the scope ▸ Fraud ▸ Defense of self and others
REVIEW: INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ▸ Act: ∆ engages
in extreme & outrageous conduct ▸ Intent: intended to cause π distress / reckless indifference; i.e., acted even though knew or should have known would cause distress ▸ Causation: that causes π to suffer ▸ Result: severe emotional distress
CONSENT: McQuiggan v. Boy Scouts of America
CONSENT PROBLEMS P. 126
SCOPE OF CONSENT ▸ Koffman v. Garnett ▸ Problems pp.
129-130
DEFEATING THE DEFENSE: CONSENT VITIATED BY FRAUD ▸ Contrasting STD
cases ▸ Hogan v. Tavel ▸ McPherson v. McPherson ▸ Problems pp. 133-134