Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Torts: class 8
Search
kstreseman
September 12, 2018
0
27
Torts: class 8
kstreseman
September 12, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by kstreseman
See All by kstreseman
Torts: class 22
kstreseman
1
32
Torts: class 21
kstreseman
0
31
Torts: class 20
kstreseman
0
49
Torts: class 19
kstreseman
0
110
Torts: class 18
kstreseman
0
56
Torts: class 17
kstreseman
0
44
Torts: class 16
kstreseman
0
100
Torts: class 15
kstreseman
0
34
Torts: class 14
kstreseman
0
21
Featured
See All Featured
What Being in a Rock Band Can Teach Us About Real World SEO
427marketing
0
170
Optimising Largest Contentful Paint
csswizardry
37
3.6k
Highjacked: Video Game Concept Design
rkendrick25
PRO
1
290
The Spectacular Lies of Maps
axbom
PRO
1
520
Max Prin - Stacking Signals: How International SEO Comes Together (And Falls Apart)
techseoconnect
PRO
0
85
Data-driven link building: lessons from a $708K investment (BrightonSEO talk)
szymonslowik
1
910
Imperfection Machines: The Place of Print at Facebook
scottboms
269
14k
Reality Check: Gamification 10 Years Later
codingconduct
0
2k
How to audit for AI Accessibility on your Front & Back End
davetheseo
0
180
The World Runs on Bad Software
bkeepers
PRO
72
12k
[RailsConf 2023 Opening Keynote] The Magic of Rails
eileencodes
31
9.9k
SERP Conf. Vienna - Web Accessibility: Optimizing for Inclusivity and SEO
sarafernandez
1
1.3k
Transcript
CLASS 8 DEFENSES TO INTENTIONAL TORTS ▸ Overview ▸ Consent
▸ Standard & effect ▸ Limitations ▸ Exceeding the scope ▸ Fraud ▸ Defense of self and others
REVIEW: INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ▸ Act: ∆ engages
in extreme & outrageous conduct ▸ Intent: intended to cause π distress / reckless indifference; i.e., acted even though knew or should have known would cause distress ▸ Causation: that causes π to suffer ▸ Result: severe emotional distress
CONSENT: McQuiggan v. Boy Scouts of America
CONSENT PROBLEMS P. 126
SCOPE OF CONSENT ▸ Koffman v. Garnett ▸ Problems pp.
129-130
DEFEATING THE DEFENSE: CONSENT VITIATED BY FRAUD ▸ Contrasting STD
cases ▸ Hogan v. Tavel ▸ McPherson v. McPherson ▸ Problems pp. 133-134