Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Torts: class 8
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
kstreseman
September 12, 2018
0
28
Torts: class 8
kstreseman
September 12, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by kstreseman
See All by kstreseman
Torts: class 22
kstreseman
1
34
Torts: class 21
kstreseman
0
33
Torts: class 20
kstreseman
0
51
Torts: class 19
kstreseman
0
120
Torts: class 18
kstreseman
0
58
Torts: class 17
kstreseman
0
44
Torts: class 16
kstreseman
0
100
Torts: class 15
kstreseman
0
35
Torts: class 14
kstreseman
0
23
Featured
See All Featured
The AI Search Optimization Roadmap by Aleyda Solis
aleyda
1
5.4k
The Art of Programming - Codeland 2020
erikaheidi
57
14k
WENDY [Excerpt]
tessaabrams
9
36k
Exploring anti-patterns in Rails
aemeredith
2
290
Faster Mobile Websites
deanohume
310
31k
[RailsConf 2023] Rails as a piece of cake
palkan
59
6.4k
Marketing Yourself as an Engineer | Alaka | Gurzu
gurzu
0
150
Keith and Marios Guide to Fast Websites
keithpitt
413
23k
How To Speak Unicorn (iThemes Webinar)
marktimemedia
1
410
No one is an island. Learnings from fostering a developers community.
thoeni
21
3.6k
Making Projects Easy
brettharned
120
6.6k
My Coaching Mixtape
mlcsv
0
70
Transcript
CLASS 8 DEFENSES TO INTENTIONAL TORTS ▸ Overview ▸ Consent
▸ Standard & effect ▸ Limitations ▸ Exceeding the scope ▸ Fraud ▸ Defense of self and others
REVIEW: INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ▸ Act: ∆ engages
in extreme & outrageous conduct ▸ Intent: intended to cause π distress / reckless indifference; i.e., acted even though knew or should have known would cause distress ▸ Causation: that causes π to suffer ▸ Result: severe emotional distress
CONSENT: McQuiggan v. Boy Scouts of America
CONSENT PROBLEMS P. 126
SCOPE OF CONSENT ▸ Koffman v. Garnett ▸ Problems pp.
129-130
DEFEATING THE DEFENSE: CONSENT VITIATED BY FRAUD ▸ Contrasting STD
cases ▸ Hogan v. Tavel ▸ McPherson v. McPherson ▸ Problems pp. 133-134