Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Torts: class 8
Search
kstreseman
September 12, 2018
35
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Torts: class 8
kstreseman
September 12, 2018
More Decks by kstreseman
See All by kstreseman
Torts: class 22
kstreseman
1
39
Torts: class 21
kstreseman
0
39
Torts: class 20
kstreseman
0
58
Torts: class 19
kstreseman
0
130
Torts: class 18
kstreseman
0
66
Torts: class 17
kstreseman
0
59
Torts: class 16
kstreseman
0
120
Torts: class 15
kstreseman
0
42
Torts: class 14
kstreseman
0
28
Featured
See All Featured
Building Flexible Design Systems
yeseniaperezcruz
330
41k
GraphQLの誤解/rethinking-graphql
sonatard
75
12k
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
37
7.4k
The Curious Case for Waylosing
cassininazir
1
500
SEO in 2025: How to Prepare for the Future of Search
ipullrank
3
3.8k
DevOps and Value Stream Thinking: Enabling flow, efficiency and business value
helenjbeal
1
380
How to Get Subject Matter Experts Bought In and Actively Contributing to SEO & PR Initiatives.
livdayseo
0
190
The untapped power of vector embeddings
frankvandijk
2
1.9k
Reflections from 52 weeks, 52 projects
jeffersonlam
356
21k
Building an army of robots
kneath
306
46k
Why Our Code Smells
bkeepers
PRO
340
58k
Fight the Zombie Pattern Library - RWD Summit 2016
marcelosomers
234
17k
Transcript
CLASS 8 DEFENSES TO INTENTIONAL TORTS ▸ Overview ▸ Consent
▸ Standard & effect ▸ Limitations ▸ Exceeding the scope ▸ Fraud ▸ Defense of self and others
REVIEW: INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ▸ Act: ∆ engages
in extreme & outrageous conduct ▸ Intent: intended to cause π distress / reckless indifference; i.e., acted even though knew or should have known would cause distress ▸ Causation: that causes π to suffer ▸ Result: severe emotional distress
CONSENT: McQuiggan v. Boy Scouts of America
CONSENT PROBLEMS P. 126
SCOPE OF CONSENT ▸ Koffman v. Garnett ▸ Problems pp.
129-130
DEFEATING THE DEFENSE: CONSENT VITIATED BY FRAUD ▸ Contrasting STD
cases ▸ Hogan v. Tavel ▸ McPherson v. McPherson ▸ Problems pp. 133-134