Lock in $30 Savings on PRO—Offer Ends Soon! ⏳
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Testing JavaScript
Search
Irfan Maulana
May 24, 2022
Programming
0
160
Testing JavaScript
Intro to JavaScript testing
Irfan Maulana
May 24, 2022
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Irfan Maulana
See All by Irfan Maulana
Panduan untuk mempublikasikan kode ke publik
mazipan
0
140
Mengukur dan meningkatkan performa website
mazipan
1
230
Membuat Website Zaman Sekarang
mazipan
0
510
Kinerja Web 101 - Edisi 2022
mazipan
1
470
Layout Repaint & The Lessons Learned
mazipan
0
420
Bagaimana implementasi mockup design
mazipan
0
520
Memulai karir sebagai web programmer
mazipan
0
750
Membuat laporan kecepatan web untuk blog
mazipan
0
540
Bongkar Dapur Webnya #PHPID-OL
mazipan
0
530
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
生成AIを利用するだけでなく、投資できる組織へ
pospome
2
350
AIの誤りが許されない業務システムにおいて“信頼されるAI” を目指す / building-trusted-ai-systems
yuya4
6
3.7k
20 years of Symfony, what's next?
fabpot
2
360
AIエンジニアリングのご紹介 / Introduction to AI Engineering
rkaga
8
2.9k
組み合わせ爆発にのまれない - 責務分割 x テスト
halhorn
1
150
C-Shared Buildで突破するAI Agent バックテストの壁
po3rin
0
390
The Past, Present, and Future of Enterprise Java
ivargrimstad
0
120
Flutter On-device AI로 완성하는 오프라인 앱, 박제창 @DevFest INCHEON 2025
itsmedreamwalker
1
110
【CA.ai #3】Google ADKを活用したAI Agent開発と運用知見
harappa80
0
310
dotfiles 式年遷宮 令和最新版
masawada
1
780
新卒エンジニアのプルリクエスト with AI駆動
fukunaga2025
0
230
Rubyで鍛える仕組み化プロヂュース力
muryoimpl
0
140
Featured
See All Featured
Reflections from 52 weeks, 52 projects
jeffersonlam
355
21k
Designing Dashboards & Data Visualisations in Web Apps
destraynor
231
54k
Build your cross-platform service in a week with App Engine
jlugia
234
18k
Designing Experiences People Love
moore
143
24k
The Hidden Cost of Media on the Web [PixelPalooza 2025]
tammyeverts
1
100
GraphQLとの向き合い方2022年版
quramy
50
14k
CoffeeScript is Beautiful & I Never Want to Write Plain JavaScript Again
sstephenson
162
16k
Learning to Love Humans: Emotional Interface Design
aarron
274
41k
Put a Button on it: Removing Barriers to Going Fast.
kastner
60
4.1k
Automating Front-end Workflow
addyosmani
1371
200k
個人開発の失敗を避けるイケてる考え方 / tips for indie hackers
panda_program
122
21k
Save Time (by Creating Custom Rails Generators)
garrettdimon
PRO
32
1.8k
Transcript
Testing JavaScript By Irfan Maulana
Hi, I am Irfan Working at Tokopedia as Principal Engineer
for Web Platform Team. mazipan.space @Maz_Ipan
A process to verifying the correctness & validating the functional
features of the app being developed APPLICATION TESTING
Software Development Life Cycle
JAVASCRIPT APPLICATION Frontend Backend Handling UI functionality: web, apps, desktop
Handling business logic, data store connection A B We will focus on the Frontend for this session.
PERFORM APP TESTING MANUAL AUTOMATED
WHY DO WE NEED? Bugs are bad, and who gets
blamed? The developer. You know humans are bad at complex, repetitive tasks. Computers are very, very good at complex, repetitive tasks. A professional ships working code. Code that works. Code that is well tested.
Focused on input & output. Not interested about the things
happening inside. Involve testing of the internal structure, code, design & implementation. METHODOLOGIES BLACKBOX WHITEBOX
TESTING PROCESS 1. PLANNING 2. PREPARATION 3. EXECUTION 4. REPORTING
THE TESTING TYPES
PROVEN METHOD FOR TESTING APP
STATIC TEST To catch typos, errors, possible bugs as you
write the code. Tools: • ESLint + Prettier • CodeQL, Snyk, SonarQube
Very fast feedback Can not reproduce functional bugs faced by
users STATIC TEST: PRO & CONS We can mark it as mandatory Very beneficial in the development phase
UNIT TEST To verify that individual, isolated and smallest part
works as expected. Tools: • TestingLibrary.com
Fast feedback Need an extra effort to write UT UNIT
TEST: PRO & CONS Verify the correctness of the function Can not represent the bug when the unit integrated Can not represent real user interaction
INTEGRATION TEST To verify that several units work together in
harmony. Tools: • TestingLibrary.com
Verify most of user interactions Slower feedback than UT More
effort than UT INTEGRATION TEST: PRO & CONS Can not represent device variant Can not replicate using the real data
END-TO-END TEST A robot that behaves like a user to
click around the app and verify that it functions correctly. Tools: • Cypress • Nightwatch • TestCafe
Can use multiple device Very slow to executed Need the
biggest effort E2E TEST: PRO & CONS Can use real data Replicate real user
COMPARISON Static Test Unit Test Integration E2E Test 🚀 Speed
🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 ⏰ Development time 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 💰 Cost 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 😎 Confidence 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 Read more on https://kentcdodds.com/blog/static-vs-unit-vs-integration-vs-e2e-tests
BEST ROI https://twitter.com/kentcdodds/status/960723172591992832
DEMO TIME!
CHECK THE CODE https://github.com/mazipan/react-testing-workshop Prerequisites: • Node.js
ASK ME!
CREDITS: This presentation template was created by Slidesgo, including icons
by Flaticon, and infographics & images by Freepik and illustrations by Stories. THANK YOU Please keep this slide for attribution.