Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Testing JavaScript
Search
Irfan Maulana
May 24, 2022
Programming
0
140
Testing JavaScript
Intro to JavaScript testing
Irfan Maulana
May 24, 2022
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Irfan Maulana
See All by Irfan Maulana
Panduan untuk mempublikasikan kode ke publik
mazipan
0
110
Mengukur dan meningkatkan performa website
mazipan
1
210
Membuat Website Zaman Sekarang
mazipan
0
490
Kinerja Web 101 - Edisi 2022
mazipan
1
450
Layout Repaint & The Lessons Learned
mazipan
0
410
Bagaimana implementasi mockup design
mazipan
0
480
Memulai karir sebagai web programmer
mazipan
0
730
Membuat laporan kecepatan web untuk blog
mazipan
0
520
Bongkar Dapur Webnya #PHPID-OL
mazipan
0
510
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
商品比較サービス「マイベスト」における パーソナライズレコメンドの第一歩
ucchiii43
0
180
なぜ「共通化」を考え、失敗を繰り返すのか
rinchoku
1
680
#QiitaBash MCPのセキュリティ
ryosukedtomita
1
1.5k
Quand Symfony, ApiPlatform, OpenAI et LangChain s'allient pour exploiter vos PDF : de la théorie à la production…
ahmedbhs123
0
220
Model Pollution
hschwentner
1
160
脱Riverpod?fqueryで考える、TanStack Queryライクなアーキテクチャの可能性
ostk0069
0
500
『自分のデータだけ見せたい!』を叶える──Laravel × Casbin で複雑権限をスッキリ解きほぐす 25 分
akitotsukahara
2
660
Claude Code派?Gemini CLI派? みんなで比較LT会!_20250716
junholee
1
530
リバースエンジニアリング新時代へ! GhidraとClaude DesktopをMCPで繋ぐ/findy202507
tkmru
3
960
Vibe Codingの幻想を超えて-生成AIを現場で使えるようにするまでの泥臭い話.ai
fumiyakume
9
3.8k
チームのテスト力を総合的に鍛えて品質、スピード、レジリエンスを共立させる/Testing approach that improves quality, speed, and resilience
goyoki
5
1.1k
バイブコーディング超えてバイブデプロイ〜CloudflareMCPで実現する、未来のアプリケーションデリバリー〜
azukiazusa1
0
330
Featured
See All Featured
The Straight Up "How To Draw Better" Workshop
denniskardys
235
140k
Optimizing for Happiness
mojombo
379
70k
The Art of Programming - Codeland 2020
erikaheidi
54
13k
Git: the NoSQL Database
bkeepers
PRO
430
65k
The Language of Interfaces
destraynor
158
25k
Writing Fast Ruby
sferik
628
62k
Why Our Code Smells
bkeepers
PRO
337
57k
Fireside Chat
paigeccino
37
3.5k
Embracing the Ebb and Flow
colly
86
4.8k
Easily Structure & Communicate Ideas using Wireframe
afnizarnur
194
16k
Building Flexible Design Systems
yeseniaperezcruz
328
39k
Adopting Sorbet at Scale
ufuk
77
9.5k
Transcript
Testing JavaScript By Irfan Maulana
Hi, I am Irfan Working at Tokopedia as Principal Engineer
for Web Platform Team. mazipan.space @Maz_Ipan
A process to verifying the correctness & validating the functional
features of the app being developed APPLICATION TESTING
Software Development Life Cycle
JAVASCRIPT APPLICATION Frontend Backend Handling UI functionality: web, apps, desktop
Handling business logic, data store connection A B We will focus on the Frontend for this session.
PERFORM APP TESTING MANUAL AUTOMATED
WHY DO WE NEED? Bugs are bad, and who gets
blamed? The developer. You know humans are bad at complex, repetitive tasks. Computers are very, very good at complex, repetitive tasks. A professional ships working code. Code that works. Code that is well tested.
Focused on input & output. Not interested about the things
happening inside. Involve testing of the internal structure, code, design & implementation. METHODOLOGIES BLACKBOX WHITEBOX
TESTING PROCESS 1. PLANNING 2. PREPARATION 3. EXECUTION 4. REPORTING
THE TESTING TYPES
PROVEN METHOD FOR TESTING APP
STATIC TEST To catch typos, errors, possible bugs as you
write the code. Tools: • ESLint + Prettier • CodeQL, Snyk, SonarQube
Very fast feedback Can not reproduce functional bugs faced by
users STATIC TEST: PRO & CONS We can mark it as mandatory Very beneficial in the development phase
UNIT TEST To verify that individual, isolated and smallest part
works as expected. Tools: • TestingLibrary.com
Fast feedback Need an extra effort to write UT UNIT
TEST: PRO & CONS Verify the correctness of the function Can not represent the bug when the unit integrated Can not represent real user interaction
INTEGRATION TEST To verify that several units work together in
harmony. Tools: • TestingLibrary.com
Verify most of user interactions Slower feedback than UT More
effort than UT INTEGRATION TEST: PRO & CONS Can not represent device variant Can not replicate using the real data
END-TO-END TEST A robot that behaves like a user to
click around the app and verify that it functions correctly. Tools: • Cypress • Nightwatch • TestCafe
Can use multiple device Very slow to executed Need the
biggest effort E2E TEST: PRO & CONS Can use real data Replicate real user
COMPARISON Static Test Unit Test Integration E2E Test 🚀 Speed
🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 ⏰ Development time 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 💰 Cost 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 😎 Confidence 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 🟢 Read more on https://kentcdodds.com/blog/static-vs-unit-vs-integration-vs-e2e-tests
BEST ROI https://twitter.com/kentcdodds/status/960723172591992832
DEMO TIME!
CHECK THE CODE https://github.com/mazipan/react-testing-workshop Prerequisites: • Node.js
ASK ME!
CREDITS: This presentation template was created by Slidesgo, including icons
by Flaticon, and infographics & images by Freepik and illustrations by Stories. THANK YOU Please keep this slide for attribution.