Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Sign up for free
Menu
Search
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Pricing
Search
Sign in
Sign up for free
Formal Specifications and Other People's Tech
Search
Marianne Bellotti
September 13, 2019
Technology
170
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Formal Specifications and Other People's Tech
How do you use formal specification like TLA+ to model real world engineering challenges?
Marianne Bellotti
September 13, 2019
More Decks by Marianne Bellotti
See All by Marianne Bellotti
Building Safety Critical Systems
mbellotti
0
200
Killer Robots and Rogue AI
mbellotti
0
39
Five Lies of Modernization
mbellotti
0
51
Interdisciplinary Engineering
mbellotti
0
200
Worst Case Scenario in the Database
mbellotti
0
120
Death of the Trusted Internet
mbellotti
0
150
Debunking Other People's Data Science
mbellotti
0
140
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
データ界隈LT祭 第1回LT登壇
taromatsui_cccmkhd
2
1.5k
Goodbye ShellScript, Hello File-based App
shunsock
0
280
作って終わりじゃないサーバーレス 〜9年運用する大規模EC物流API基盤の設計・運用のリアル〜
zozotech
PRO
0
210
登壇の自信を奪う3匹のオバケ / 3 Ghosts That Rob You of Your Confidence in Public Speaking
pauli
9
1k
AI時代、データエンジニアが一番おもろい
genshun9
0
670
HRC_Frontend_Conference_Fukuoka_2026.pdf
ts020
0
750
AIで社員の自主発信に広報目線を組み込む
_mossann_t
0
130
AIエージェントの一手は 誰も見ていない - Falco拡張OSS「Prempti」とeBPFで サーバーレス実行基盤を二層防御する
keitah
0
250
あけおめLINE 傾向とその対策
nasa9084
0
170
Issue 駆動でスペシャリストの意図を届ける、AI 実装のアクセシビリティ向上
thkt
0
120
リアーキテクチャ後の障害ゼロを目指したShadow Testingの取り組み
nihonbuson
PRO
1
160
AIを活用するために決めた "やらないこと" - 価値に注目する / Not betting on AI
soudai
PRO
3
560
Featured
See All Featured
The browser strikes back
jonoalderson
0
1.7k
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
productmarketing
PRO
24
4.2k
Prompt Engineering for Job Search
mfonobong
0
450
Distributed Sagas: A Protocol for Coordinating Microservices
caitiem20
333
23k
The Curse of the Amulet
leimatthew05
3
15k
New Earth Scene 8
popppiees
4
2.6k
HTML-Aware ERB: The Path to Reactive Rendering @ RubyCon 2026, Rimini, Italy
marcoroth
5
680
Save Time (by Creating Custom Rails Generators)
garrettdimon
PRO
32
4.8k
From Legacy to Launchpad: Building Startup-Ready Communities
dugsong
0
330
Product Roadmaps are Hard
iamctodd
55
13k
Primal Persuasion: How to Engage the Brain for Learning That Lasts
tmiket
0
460
The Psychology of Web Performance [Beyond Tellerrand 2023]
tammyeverts
49
3.6k
Transcript
auth0.com Formal Specification Taming Other People's Tech &
SPECS! BY BEGINNERS FOR BEGINNERS @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
TLA+ Conf Finding Bugs Without Running or Even Looking at
Code Correctness Proofs of Distributed Systems with Isabelle
WHAT IS FORMAL SPECIFICATION? @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
-Inputs -Expected behavior -Legal outputs -Illegal behavior
Tell me the future, wise computer @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
@bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
!! @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
@bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0 Mostly I write bad specs, and this talk
is about how that still adds a lot of value The more people write specs the faster we all learn
S3 Design Session @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
MOST ENGINEERS WILL NEVER BUILD A MESSAGE QUEUE You’ll buy
one from AWS
BUT SPECIFICATION CAN BE APPLIED TO MANY DIFFERENT THINGS! @bellmar
bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
@bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0 Identity as a Service
@bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Built by other teams
In taking over a service: - Defining SLOs - Evaluating
debt - Studying existing problems and rethinking architecture
EMAILS - validate email - password reset - principal mode
of communication We do logins not emails!
EMAILS - validate email - password reset - principal mode
of communication @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
X per hour @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
@bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
@bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Email all my users! Password Reset Anomaly Detection Welcome Email
Validation @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
@bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
HOW DO WE KNOW IF THIS CHANGE IS SAFE? @bellmar
bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
LET’S WRITE A SPEC! @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
STEPS WITH SPECIFICATIONS YOU THINK IN STATES WITH ALGORITHMS YOU
THINK IN @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
@bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
@bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
\ 40% → ✅ 41% → ✅ 42% → ✅
43% → ✅ 44% → ✅ 45% → ✅ 46% → ✅ 47% → ✅ 48% → ✅ 49% → ✅ 50% → ✅
VM 50% VM 20% VM 70%
VM 50% VM 20% VM 70% Test all possible states
to make sure the load balancer does the right thing
40% → ✅ 41% → ✅ 42% → ✅ 43%
→ ✅ 44% → ✅ 45% → ✅ 46% → ✅ 47% → ✅ 48% → ✅ 49% → ✅ 50% → ✅ 40% → ✅ 50% → ✅ 60% → ✅ 70% → ❌ ✅ ❌
Normal Idle Unhealthy @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Must always be true: 0 < servers > 10 Goto!
Party like it’s 1979…
LEAVE YOUR PROBABILITY AT HOME
Sometimes we kill a server, sometimes we create one Literally
the one time we just keep killing servers @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Sometimes we kill a server, sometimes we create one Literally
the one time we just keep killing servers ARGH! BUT WHY? THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN!!
SYSTEM NOT SYSTEM LGTM SAFETY @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Normal Idle Unhealthy Health Check @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
- Several unhealthy servers == Create new - All servers
healthy and more than 3 == Shut one down - Else assume we kill and refresh unhealthy
- Several unhealthy servers == Create new - All servers
healthy and more than 3 == Shut one down - Else assume we kill and refresh unhealthy
WHAT STATES SHOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE? (NOT UNDESIRABLE?) @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Servers keep restarting Too many servers Too few servers Healthcheck
action inconsistency @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Servers keep restarting Too many servers Too few servers Healthcheck
action inconsistency Undesirable but not impossible states @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Maybe you should turn yourself rather than the puzzle
Anyway… @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
x per hour @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
One please! @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
One please! Sorry no more tokens. Sit in the retry
queue and come back later @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
One please! Sorry no more tokens. Sit in the retry
queue and come back later @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
STATE HOW DO WE MAKE THIS LOOK LIKE A MACHINE
@bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Queued → Worker → Sent Has Tokens → No Tokens
@bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Queued Worker Sent @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Queued Worker Sent Dropped @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
WHAT’S STATES SHOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE? @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Has Token → Deleted Sent → Deleted Deleted → Sent
No Token → Sent @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
HOW DOES OUR IMPLEMENTATION PREVENT THESE STATES? @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
JUST TRYING TO BUILD THE MODEL OFTEN REVEALS BUGS @bellmar
bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Email all my users! Password Reset Anomaly Detection Welcome Email
Validation @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Email all my users! Password Reset Anomaly Detection Welcome Email
Validation @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Queued Worker @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
GREAT, SO WHAT SHOULD OUR MODEL LOOK LIKE? @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Tenant Tenant Tenant @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Tenant @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0 For each tenant For each bucket
LOOPS WILL F— YOU UP LOOPS @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
x in [a, b, c] print x “a” “b” “c”
@bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
x in [a, b, c] l=append(l, x) l = [
] print l @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
x in [a, b, c] l=append(l, x) [“a”] [“a”, “b”]
[“a”, “b”, “c”] l = [ ] print l @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
x in [a, b, c] l = [ ] [“a”]
[“b”] [“c”] l=append(l, x) print l @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
A B C then then A B C or or
Steps States @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Tenant Tenant Tenant @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Tenant Tenant Tenant @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
@bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Alice Bob Oh… that’s easy!
Undesirable -vs- Impossible
Queue Publishers
“SHOULD THE PUBLISHERS BE PUTTING THINGS DIRECTLY IN THE QUEUE?”
@bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0 WAIT…
1) Make it look like a state machine 2) Define
the impossible states 3) Model what makes them impossible To Summarize: @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Things that already look like state machines: @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Things that already look like state machines: - Redux @bellmar
bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Things that already look like state machines: - Redux -
AWS Lambda @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Things that already look like state machines: - Redux -
AWS Lambda - Workflow Orchestration (Airflow, Conductor, Luigi) @bellmar bit.ly/bellmar-auth0
Bit.ly/bellmar-auth0