Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Better Recursion With Swift
Search
Matt Isaacs
August 26, 2015
Programming
1
600
Better Recursion With Swift
Presented at the Brooklyn Swift Developers Meetup, August 2015.
Matt Isaacs
August 26, 2015
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Matt Isaacs
See All by Matt Isaacs
iOS Testing with Appium at Gilt
ontherocks
0
140
Mobile Testing at Gilt
ontherocks
0
48
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Flutterアプリ運用の現場で役立った監視Tips 5選
ostk0069
1
510
Java_プロセスのメモリ監視の落とし穴_NMT_で見抜けない_glibc_キャッシュ問題_.pdf
ntt_dsol_java
0
230
CloudNative Days Winter 2025: 一週間で作る低レイヤコンテナランタイム
ternbusty
7
1.7k
FlutterKaigi 2025 システム裏側
yumnumm
0
1.2k
「AWS CDK入門」の前日譚/Prequelto-Introduction-To-AWSCDK
tyumugi1113
0
100
GraalVM Native Image トラブルシューティング機能の最新状況(2025年版)
ntt_dsol_java
0
170
「文字列→日付」の落とし穴 〜Ruby Date.parseの意外な挙動〜
sg4k0
0
270
「10分以内に機能を消せる状態」 の実現のためにやっていること
togishima
1
540
TypeScript 5.9で使えるようになった import defer でパフォーマンス最適化を実現する
bicstone
1
390
Developing Specifications - Jakarta EE: a Real World Example
ivargrimstad
0
190
Web エンジニアが JavaScript で AI Agent を作る / JSConf JP 2025 sponsor session
izumin5210
4
2k
最新のDirectX12で使えるレイトレ周りの機能追加について
projectasura
0
300
Featured
See All Featured
Optimizing for Happiness
mojombo
379
70k
Sharpening the Axe: The Primacy of Toolmaking
bcantrill
46
2.6k
Design and Strategy: How to Deal with People Who Don’t "Get" Design
morganepeng
132
19k
RailsConf & Balkan Ruby 2019: The Past, Present, and Future of Rails at GitHub
eileencodes
140
34k
The Cult of Friendly URLs
andyhume
79
6.7k
個人開発の失敗を避けるイケてる考え方 / tips for indie hackers
panda_program
118
20k
BBQ
matthewcrist
89
9.9k
Statistics for Hackers
jakevdp
799
230k
It's Worth the Effort
3n
187
29k
Designing Experiences People Love
moore
142
24k
Unsuck your backbone
ammeep
671
58k
Fight the Zombie Pattern Library - RWD Summit 2016
marcelosomers
234
17k
Transcript
BETTER RECURSION WITH SWIFT
AKA…
RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARC Another reason why Swift value
types matter.
None
None
None
FAST. MODERN. SAFE
FUNCTIONAL-ISH
let str = "Favours Immutability"
GOOD: CONCURRENCY
MEH: CACHE EFFICIENCY
CHALLENGE FOR ITERATION
func factorial(n: Int) -> Int { var result = 1
var x = n while x > 0 { result = result * x x-- } return result }
RECURSION Immutable iteration!
func factorialRec(n: Int) -> Int { if n > 0
{ return n * factorialRec(n - 1) } return 1 }
ELEGANT.
YET INEFFICIENT. New call frame on each iteration.
STACK OVERFLOW Easier than ever with recursion!
All Is not Lost
TAIL CALLS Recursive call is performed last.
func tco(n: Int, acc: Int) -> Int { if n
> 0 { return tco(n - 1, acc * n) } return acc }
func tco(n: Int, acc: Int) -> Int { if n
> 0 { return tco(n - 1, acc * n) } return acc } func factorialTCO(n: Int) -> Int { return tco(n, 1) }
func tco(n: Int, acc: Int) -> Int { if n
> 0 { return tco(n - 1, acc * n) } return acc }
CAN BE OPTIMIZED To something like this…
func factorial(n: Int) -> Int { var result = 1
var x = n while x > 0 { result = result * x x-- } return result }
DOES SWIFT DO THIS?
DOES SWIFT DO THIS? The internet says: *Sometimes*
None
Or… xcrun swiftc -S
AMD64 ABI Args placed in rdi, rsi, rdx, .. Return
value -> rax
func tco(n: Int, acc: Int) -> Int rdi → n
rsi → acc rax → return value
IS TCO HAPPENING? call → Bad - Creates new stack
frame jmp, jg, jle, j… → Good - Stays in current stack frame
__TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp subq $64, %rsp cmpq
$0, %rdi movq %rdi, -8(%rbp) movq %rsi, -16(%rbp) jle LBB19_4 . . movq -24(%rbp), %rdi movq -40(%rbp), %rsi callq __TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_4: movq -16(%rbp), %rax movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_5: movq -56(%rbp), %rax addq $64, %rsp popq %rbp retq
__TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp subq $64, %rsp cmpq
$0, %rdi movq %rdi, -8(%rbp) movq %rsi, -16(%rbp) jle LBB19_4 . . movq -24(%rbp), %rdi movq -40(%rbp), %rsi callq __TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_4: movq -16(%rbp), %rax movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_5: movq -56(%rbp), %rax addq $64, %rsp popq %rbp retq Stack frame setup.
__TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp subq $64, %rsp cmpq
$0, %rdi movq %rdi, -8(%rbp) movq %rsi, -16(%rbp) jle LBB19_4 . . movq -24(%rbp), %rdi movq -40(%rbp), %rsi callq __TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_4: movq -16(%rbp), %rax movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_5: movq -56(%rbp), %rax addq $64, %rsp popq %rbp retq Stack frame setup. if n > 0
__TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp subq $64, %rsp cmpq
$0, %rdi movq %rdi, -8(%rbp) movq %rsi, -16(%rbp) jle LBB19_4 . . movq -24(%rbp), %rdi movq -40(%rbp), %rsi callq __TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_4: movq -16(%rbp), %rax movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_5: movq -56(%rbp), %rax addq $64, %rsp popq %rbp retq Stack frame setup. if n > 0
__TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp subq $64, %rsp cmpq
$0, %rdi movq %rdi, -8(%rbp) movq %rsi, -16(%rbp) jle LBB19_4 . . movq -24(%rbp), %rdi movq -40(%rbp), %rsi callq __TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_4: movq -16(%rbp), %rax movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_5: movq -56(%rbp), %rax addq $64, %rsp popq %rbp retq Stack frame setup. if n > 0 Return value
__TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp subq $64, %rsp cmpq
$0, %rdi movq %rdi, -8(%rbp) movq %rsi, -16(%rbp) jle LBB19_4 . . movq -24(%rbp), %rdi movq -40(%rbp), %rsi callq __TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_4: movq -16(%rbp), %rax movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_5: movq -56(%rbp), %rax addq $64, %rsp popq %rbp retq Stack frame setup. if n > 0 Return value Restore caller stack frame
__TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp subq $64, %rsp cmpq
$0, %rdi movq %rdi, -8(%rbp) movq %rsi, -16(%rbp) jle LBB19_4 . . movq -24(%rbp), %rdi movq -40(%rbp), %rsi callq __TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_4: movq -16(%rbp), %rax movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_5: movq -56(%rbp), %rax addq $64, %rsp popq %rbp retq No TCO
OPTIMIZE
WALK: -Onone
KILL: -O
-Ounchecked
__TTSf4s_s___TF4tcoO3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp testq %rdi, %rdi jle
LBB33_4 LBB33_1: movq %rdi, %rax decq %rax jo LBB33_5 imulq %rdi, %rsi jo LBB33_5 testq %rax, %rax movq %rax, %rdi jg LBB33_1 LBB33_4: movq %rsi, %rax popq %rbp retq
__TTSf4s_s___TF4tcoO3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp testq %rdi, %rdi jle
LBB33_4 LBB33_1: movq %rdi, %rax decq %rax jo LBB33_5 imulq %rdi, %rsi jo LBB33_5 testq %rax, %rax movq %rax, %rdi jg LBB33_1 LBB33_4: movq %rsi, %rax popq %rbp retq
__TTSf4s_s___TF4tcoO3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp testq %rdi, %rdi jle
LBB33_4 LBB33_1: movq %rdi, %rax decq %rax jo LBB33_5 imulq %rdi, %rsi jo LBB33_5 testq %rax, %rax movq %rax, %rdi jg LBB33_1 LBB33_4: movq %rsi, %rax popq %rbp retq
SOMETIMES Swift Does This.
AUTOMATIC REFERENCE COUNTING Imagine compile time garbage collection.
OLDEN TIMES Memory managed by hand.
@interface Something() { NSNumber *_numberIvar; } @end @implementation Something -
(void)setNumber:(NSNumber *)number { NSNumber *tmp = _numberIvar; _numberIvar = [number retain]; [tmp release]; } @end
@interface Something() { NSNumber *_numberIvar; } @end @implementation Something -
(void)setNumber:(NSNumber *)number { NSNumber *tmp = _numberIvar; _numberIvar = [number retain]; [tmp release]; } @end
WITH ARC
- (void)setNumber:(NSNumber *)number { _numberIvar = number; }
COMPILER MAGIC Inserts retain/release calls.
ARC in Swift Manages references.
TCO + ARC
class Integer: IntegerLiteralConvertible { let val: Int required init(integerLiteral value:
Int) { self.val = value } init(_ val: Int) { self.val = val } }
func +(lhs: Integer, rhs: Integer) -> Integer { return Integer(lhs.val
+ rhs.val) } func -(lhs: Integer, rhs: Integer) -> Integer { return Integer(lhs.val - rhs.val) } func *(lhs: Integer, rhs: Integer) -> Integer { return Integer(lhs.val * rhs.val) } func >(lhs: Integer, rhs: Integer) -> Bool { return lhs.val > rhs.val }
func factorialTC(n: Integer) -> Integer { return tc(n, 1) }
func tc(n: Integer, acc: Integer) -> Integer { if n > 0 { return tc(n - 1, acc * n) } return acc }
__TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp . . leaq __TMdC4tcoO7Integer+16(%rip),
%rdi callq _swift_getInitializedObjCClass movq %rax, %rbx . . movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_allocObject movq %rax, %r15 . . movq %r15, %rdi movq %rbx, %rsi callq __TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_ movq %rax, %r14 movq %r15, %rdi callq _swift_release movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_release jmp LBB34_7 LBB34_7: movq %r14, %rax . . popq %rbp retq LBB34_8:
__TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp . . leaq __TMdC4tcoO7Integer+16(%rip),
%rdi callq _swift_getInitializedObjCClass movq %rax, %rbx . . movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_allocObject movq %rax, %r15 . . movq %r15, %rdi movq %rbx, %rsi callq __TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_ movq %rax, %r14 movq %r15, %rdi callq _swift_release movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_release jmp LBB34_7 LBB34_7: movq %r14, %rax . . popq %rbp retq LBB34_8:
__TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp . . leaq __TMdC4tcoO7Integer+16(%rip),
%rdi callq _swift_getInitializedObjCClass movq %rax, %rbx . . movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_allocObject movq %rax, %r15 . . movq %r15, %rdi movq %rbx, %rsi callq __TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_ movq %rax, %r14 movq %r15, %rdi callq _swift_release movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_release jmp LBB34_7 LBB34_7: movq %r14, %rax . . popq %rbp retq LBB34_8: No TCO
__TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp . . leaq __TMdC4tcoO7Integer+16(%rip),
%rdi callq _swift_getInitializedObjCClass movq %rax, %rbx . . movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_allocObject movq %rax, %r15 . . movq %r15, %rdi movq %rbx, %rsi callq __TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_ movq %rax, %r14 movq %r15, %rdi callq _swift_release movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_release jmp LBB34_7 LBB34_7: movq %r14, %rax . . popq %rbp retq LBB34_8: No TCO Last Action Performed
Integer created on +,-,* ops
func +(lhs: Integer, rhs: Integer) -> Integer { return Integer(lhs.val
+ rhs.val) } func -(lhs: Integer, rhs: Integer) -> Integer { return Integer(lhs.val - rhs.val) } func *(lhs: Integer, rhs: Integer) -> Integer { return Integer(lhs.val * rhs.val) }
NEEDS RELEASING
func tc(n: Integer, acc: Integer) -> Integer { if n
> 0 { return tc(n - 1, acc * n) } return acc } SO THIS…
func tc(n: Integer, acc: Integer) -> Integer { let _n1
= n - 1 let _accn = acc * n if n > 0 { let tmp = tc(_n1, _accn) swift_release(_accn) swift_release(_n1) return tmp } return acc } IS REALLY SOMETHING LIKE
All Is sometimes Lost
FUNCTIONAL SWIFT Use value types.
VALUE SEMANTICS ≠ VALUE TYPES
SO.. BE CAREFULL
THANKS!
github.com/haveahennessy @haveahennessy
http://www.hopperapp.com/