Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Better Recursion With Swift
Search
Sponsored
·
SiteGround - Reliable hosting with speed, security, and support you can count on.
→
Matt Isaacs
August 26, 2015
Programming
1
600
Better Recursion With Swift
Presented at the Brooklyn Swift Developers Meetup, August 2015.
Matt Isaacs
August 26, 2015
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Matt Isaacs
See All by Matt Isaacs
iOS Testing with Appium at Gilt
ontherocks
0
140
Mobile Testing at Gilt
ontherocks
0
48
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
責任感のあるCloudWatchアラームを設計しよう
akihisaikeda
3
170
AWS re:Invent 2025参加 直前 Seattle-Tacoma Airport(SEA)におけるハードウェア紛失インシデントLT
tetutetu214
2
110
15年続くIoTサービスのSREエンジニアが挑む分散トレーシング導入
melonps
2
190
AtCoder Conference 2025
shindannin
0
1k
IFSによる形状設計/デモシーンの魅力 @ 慶應大学SFC
gam0022
1
300
AIフル活用時代だからこそ学んでおきたい働き方の心得
shinoyu
0
130
それ、本当に安全? ファイルアップロードで見落としがちなセキュリティリスクと対策
penpeen
7
3.8k
開発者から情シスまで - 多様なユーザー層に届けるAPI提供戦略 / Postman API Night Okinawa 2026 Winter
tasshi
0
200
CSC307 Lecture 06
javiergs
PRO
0
680
なぜSQLはAIぽく見えるのか/why does SQL look AI like
florets1
0
450
Apache Iceberg V3 and migration to V3
tomtanaka
0
160
AIと一緒にレガシーに向き合ってみた
nyafunta9858
0
190
Featured
See All Featured
Efficient Content Optimization with Google Search Console & Apps Script
katarinadahlin
PRO
0
310
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
307
120k
Become a Pro
speakerdeck
PRO
31
5.8k
Put a Button on it: Removing Barriers to Going Fast.
kastner
60
4.2k
Sharpening the Axe: The Primacy of Toolmaking
bcantrill
46
2.7k
Leo the Paperboy
mayatellez
4
1.4k
From π to Pie charts
rasagy
0
120
SEO Brein meetup: CTRL+C is not how to scale international SEO
lindahogenes
0
2.3k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
96
6.9k
Building Flexible Design Systems
yeseniaperezcruz
330
40k
Discover your Explorer Soul
emna__ayadi
2
1.1k
DBのスキルで生き残る技術 - AI時代におけるテーブル設計の勘所
soudai
PRO
62
49k
Transcript
BETTER RECURSION WITH SWIFT
AKA…
RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARC Another reason why Swift value
types matter.
None
None
None
FAST. MODERN. SAFE
FUNCTIONAL-ISH
let str = "Favours Immutability"
GOOD: CONCURRENCY
MEH: CACHE EFFICIENCY
CHALLENGE FOR ITERATION
func factorial(n: Int) -> Int { var result = 1
var x = n while x > 0 { result = result * x x-- } return result }
RECURSION Immutable iteration!
func factorialRec(n: Int) -> Int { if n > 0
{ return n * factorialRec(n - 1) } return 1 }
ELEGANT.
YET INEFFICIENT. New call frame on each iteration.
STACK OVERFLOW Easier than ever with recursion!
All Is not Lost
TAIL CALLS Recursive call is performed last.
func tco(n: Int, acc: Int) -> Int { if n
> 0 { return tco(n - 1, acc * n) } return acc }
func tco(n: Int, acc: Int) -> Int { if n
> 0 { return tco(n - 1, acc * n) } return acc } func factorialTCO(n: Int) -> Int { return tco(n, 1) }
func tco(n: Int, acc: Int) -> Int { if n
> 0 { return tco(n - 1, acc * n) } return acc }
CAN BE OPTIMIZED To something like this…
func factorial(n: Int) -> Int { var result = 1
var x = n while x > 0 { result = result * x x-- } return result }
DOES SWIFT DO THIS?
DOES SWIFT DO THIS? The internet says: *Sometimes*
None
Or… xcrun swiftc -S
AMD64 ABI Args placed in rdi, rsi, rdx, .. Return
value -> rax
func tco(n: Int, acc: Int) -> Int rdi → n
rsi → acc rax → return value
IS TCO HAPPENING? call → Bad - Creates new stack
frame jmp, jg, jle, j… → Good - Stays in current stack frame
__TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp subq $64, %rsp cmpq
$0, %rdi movq %rdi, -8(%rbp) movq %rsi, -16(%rbp) jle LBB19_4 . . movq -24(%rbp), %rdi movq -40(%rbp), %rsi callq __TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_4: movq -16(%rbp), %rax movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_5: movq -56(%rbp), %rax addq $64, %rsp popq %rbp retq
__TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp subq $64, %rsp cmpq
$0, %rdi movq %rdi, -8(%rbp) movq %rsi, -16(%rbp) jle LBB19_4 . . movq -24(%rbp), %rdi movq -40(%rbp), %rsi callq __TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_4: movq -16(%rbp), %rax movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_5: movq -56(%rbp), %rax addq $64, %rsp popq %rbp retq Stack frame setup.
__TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp subq $64, %rsp cmpq
$0, %rdi movq %rdi, -8(%rbp) movq %rsi, -16(%rbp) jle LBB19_4 . . movq -24(%rbp), %rdi movq -40(%rbp), %rsi callq __TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_4: movq -16(%rbp), %rax movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_5: movq -56(%rbp), %rax addq $64, %rsp popq %rbp retq Stack frame setup. if n > 0
__TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp subq $64, %rsp cmpq
$0, %rdi movq %rdi, -8(%rbp) movq %rsi, -16(%rbp) jle LBB19_4 . . movq -24(%rbp), %rdi movq -40(%rbp), %rsi callq __TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_4: movq -16(%rbp), %rax movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_5: movq -56(%rbp), %rax addq $64, %rsp popq %rbp retq Stack frame setup. if n > 0
__TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp subq $64, %rsp cmpq
$0, %rdi movq %rdi, -8(%rbp) movq %rsi, -16(%rbp) jle LBB19_4 . . movq -24(%rbp), %rdi movq -40(%rbp), %rsi callq __TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_4: movq -16(%rbp), %rax movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_5: movq -56(%rbp), %rax addq $64, %rsp popq %rbp retq Stack frame setup. if n > 0 Return value
__TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp subq $64, %rsp cmpq
$0, %rdi movq %rdi, -8(%rbp) movq %rsi, -16(%rbp) jle LBB19_4 . . movq -24(%rbp), %rdi movq -40(%rbp), %rsi callq __TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_4: movq -16(%rbp), %rax movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_5: movq -56(%rbp), %rax addq $64, %rsp popq %rbp retq Stack frame setup. if n > 0 Return value Restore caller stack frame
__TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp subq $64, %rsp cmpq
$0, %rdi movq %rdi, -8(%rbp) movq %rsi, -16(%rbp) jle LBB19_4 . . movq -24(%rbp), %rdi movq -40(%rbp), %rsi callq __TF4main3tcoFTSiSi_Si movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_4: movq -16(%rbp), %rax movq %rax, -56(%rbp) jmp LBB19_5 LBB19_5: movq -56(%rbp), %rax addq $64, %rsp popq %rbp retq No TCO
OPTIMIZE
WALK: -Onone
KILL: -O
-Ounchecked
__TTSf4s_s___TF4tcoO3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp testq %rdi, %rdi jle
LBB33_4 LBB33_1: movq %rdi, %rax decq %rax jo LBB33_5 imulq %rdi, %rsi jo LBB33_5 testq %rax, %rax movq %rax, %rdi jg LBB33_1 LBB33_4: movq %rsi, %rax popq %rbp retq
__TTSf4s_s___TF4tcoO3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp testq %rdi, %rdi jle
LBB33_4 LBB33_1: movq %rdi, %rax decq %rax jo LBB33_5 imulq %rdi, %rsi jo LBB33_5 testq %rax, %rax movq %rax, %rdi jg LBB33_1 LBB33_4: movq %rsi, %rax popq %rbp retq
__TTSf4s_s___TF4tcoO3tcoFTSiSi_Si: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp testq %rdi, %rdi jle
LBB33_4 LBB33_1: movq %rdi, %rax decq %rax jo LBB33_5 imulq %rdi, %rsi jo LBB33_5 testq %rax, %rax movq %rax, %rdi jg LBB33_1 LBB33_4: movq %rsi, %rax popq %rbp retq
SOMETIMES Swift Does This.
AUTOMATIC REFERENCE COUNTING Imagine compile time garbage collection.
OLDEN TIMES Memory managed by hand.
@interface Something() { NSNumber *_numberIvar; } @end @implementation Something -
(void)setNumber:(NSNumber *)number { NSNumber *tmp = _numberIvar; _numberIvar = [number retain]; [tmp release]; } @end
@interface Something() { NSNumber *_numberIvar; } @end @implementation Something -
(void)setNumber:(NSNumber *)number { NSNumber *tmp = _numberIvar; _numberIvar = [number retain]; [tmp release]; } @end
WITH ARC
- (void)setNumber:(NSNumber *)number { _numberIvar = number; }
COMPILER MAGIC Inserts retain/release calls.
ARC in Swift Manages references.
TCO + ARC
class Integer: IntegerLiteralConvertible { let val: Int required init(integerLiteral value:
Int) { self.val = value } init(_ val: Int) { self.val = val } }
func +(lhs: Integer, rhs: Integer) -> Integer { return Integer(lhs.val
+ rhs.val) } func -(lhs: Integer, rhs: Integer) -> Integer { return Integer(lhs.val - rhs.val) } func *(lhs: Integer, rhs: Integer) -> Integer { return Integer(lhs.val * rhs.val) } func >(lhs: Integer, rhs: Integer) -> Bool { return lhs.val > rhs.val }
func factorialTC(n: Integer) -> Integer { return tc(n, 1) }
func tc(n: Integer, acc: Integer) -> Integer { if n > 0 { return tc(n - 1, acc * n) } return acc }
__TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp . . leaq __TMdC4tcoO7Integer+16(%rip),
%rdi callq _swift_getInitializedObjCClass movq %rax, %rbx . . movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_allocObject movq %rax, %r15 . . movq %r15, %rdi movq %rbx, %rsi callq __TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_ movq %rax, %r14 movq %r15, %rdi callq _swift_release movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_release jmp LBB34_7 LBB34_7: movq %r14, %rax . . popq %rbp retq LBB34_8:
__TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp . . leaq __TMdC4tcoO7Integer+16(%rip),
%rdi callq _swift_getInitializedObjCClass movq %rax, %rbx . . movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_allocObject movq %rax, %r15 . . movq %r15, %rdi movq %rbx, %rsi callq __TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_ movq %rax, %r14 movq %r15, %rdi callq _swift_release movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_release jmp LBB34_7 LBB34_7: movq %r14, %rax . . popq %rbp retq LBB34_8:
__TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp . . leaq __TMdC4tcoO7Integer+16(%rip),
%rdi callq _swift_getInitializedObjCClass movq %rax, %rbx . . movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_allocObject movq %rax, %r15 . . movq %r15, %rdi movq %rbx, %rsi callq __TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_ movq %rax, %r14 movq %r15, %rdi callq _swift_release movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_release jmp LBB34_7 LBB34_7: movq %r14, %rax . . popq %rbp retq LBB34_8: No TCO
__TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_: pushq %rbp movq %rsp, %rbp . . leaq __TMdC4tcoO7Integer+16(%rip),
%rdi callq _swift_getInitializedObjCClass movq %rax, %rbx . . movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_allocObject movq %rax, %r15 . . movq %r15, %rdi movq %rbx, %rsi callq __TTSf4g_g___TF4tcoO2tcFTCS_7IntegerS0__S0_ movq %rax, %r14 movq %r15, %rdi callq _swift_release movq %rbx, %rdi callq _swift_release jmp LBB34_7 LBB34_7: movq %r14, %rax . . popq %rbp retq LBB34_8: No TCO Last Action Performed
Integer created on +,-,* ops
func +(lhs: Integer, rhs: Integer) -> Integer { return Integer(lhs.val
+ rhs.val) } func -(lhs: Integer, rhs: Integer) -> Integer { return Integer(lhs.val - rhs.val) } func *(lhs: Integer, rhs: Integer) -> Integer { return Integer(lhs.val * rhs.val) }
NEEDS RELEASING
func tc(n: Integer, acc: Integer) -> Integer { if n
> 0 { return tc(n - 1, acc * n) } return acc } SO THIS…
func tc(n: Integer, acc: Integer) -> Integer { let _n1
= n - 1 let _accn = acc * n if n > 0 { let tmp = tc(_n1, _accn) swift_release(_accn) swift_release(_n1) return tmp } return acc } IS REALLY SOMETHING LIKE
All Is sometimes Lost
FUNCTIONAL SWIFT Use value types.
VALUE SEMANTICS ≠ VALUE TYPES
SO.. BE CAREFULL
THANKS!
github.com/haveahennessy @haveahennessy
http://www.hopperapp.com/