from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey! ! K. Willett et al 2013 • ~300e3 galaxies (mr > 17) • ~16e6 classifications • ~50 classifications / galaxy 100s of 1000s of volunteers!
B @ n1 . . . . . . . . . . . . n37 1 C C C C C C C C C C A 3 x 96 x 96 = 27648 numbers 37 numbers People (even “pro astronomers”) disagree, so there is no single classification per galaxy. The distribution of votes is the “classification”.
B @ n1 . . . . . . . . . . . . n37 1 C C C C C C C C C C A 3 x 96 x 96 = 27648 numbers 37 numbers Thanks for the labels, volunteers! ! Now time for some supervised machine learning. some algorithm
of conv. kernels • pooling stride • choice of non-linear fn’s. • dropout • learning rates • … Lots of hyper-parameters ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Convnets might be overkill for a domain as “limited” as astronomical images. Computationally expensive to train (GPU-days or CPU-weeks) Cons