Presentation giving at the Cycle Ipswich meeting on 2014-02-13 about Filtered Permeability and how it relates to Ipswich, in part to spur conversation.
• Short motor vehicle journeys are longer • Minimal effect on longer journeys • Short walking and cycling journeys more direct and faster than by car • Roads blocked for car use, while allowing pedestrians and cyclists • Example in Ipswich: Rope Walk
currently • Stoke, Maidenhall, Chantry, Belstead Hills, Stoke Park • Westbourne, Whitehouse, Castle Hill, Whitton • California • Racecourse, Gainsborough, Greenwich
Between towns and cities • Always alternate routes for cyclists • Local distributer • Linking major roads to access roads • Usually segregated infrastructure • Access road • Quiet residential/shopping streets to get to properties, shops etc. • Through traffic minimised • Often cyclists share with motor traffic (very low volume and slow moving)
cells with only one access for motor vehicles and many access routes for cyclists and pedestrians • Through cycle routes as alternative to main road • Main roads still need fast cycle infrastructure
to see what happens when stacking lanes at traffic lights are removed • Stacking lane space can be used for segregated cycling facilities instead • Improved safety as no longer merging through junction • Tool for access to/exit from filtered permeability areas • Source: https://twitter.com/aseasyasriding/ status/430745291038277632
use temporary measures in the form of a trial • Plant pots, removable bollards, play streets (e.g. 1 afternoon per week) • Can be easily removed or changed if it doesn’t work • Easier to implement politically