Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

The Colon Vitamin

The Colon Vitamin
September 16, 2013
240

The Colon Vitamin

The scientific backing behind The Colon Vitamin

The Colon Vitamin

September 16, 2013
Tweet

Transcript

  1. The  Colon  Vitamin  contains   natural  micronutrients  and  an.oxidants  

      that  have  been  shown  in  scien?fic  studies  to  either     prevent  colon  polyps  or     are  associated  with  a  reduced  risk  of  colon  cancer.   September  2013   2   TheColonVitamin.com  
  2. Natural  Micronutrients  &  An?oxidants   Ingredients   Role   Impact

     shown  in  studies   Micronutrients   Vitamin  B2   An  important  factor  in  folate  metabolism   Protects  against  polyp  forma?on   Vitamin  B6   Prevents  abnormali?es  in  DNA  synthesis,  repair,  and   methyla?on   Reduced  colorectal  cancer  risk   Folate   Increases  DNA  methyla?on  in  colon  cells  which  is   important  in  DNA  synthesis  &  gene  stability   Reduced  risk  of  recurrent  polyps   Calcium   Appears  to  reduce  the  risk  of  colorectal  cancer  by   binding  bile  &  faPy  acids  and  by  inhibi?ng   pathological  crypt  ac?vity   Reduced  risk  of  recurrent  polyps   An7oxidants   Beta  Carotene   An  an?oxidant  with  an?neoplas?c  ac?vity   Reduced  risk  of  recurrent  polyps   Vitamin  D   Normal  &  cancerous  cells  express  Vitamin  D   receptors  which  induce  an?-­‐cancer  reac?ons   Reduced  colorectal  cancer  risk   Selenium   Protects  colon  cells  against  a  wide  range  of  external   and  internal  stressors,  including  inhibi?ng  malignant   colon  cell  prolifera?on   Reduced  risk  of  polyp  forma?on  and   colorectal  cancer  risk    Curcumin   An  an?oxidant  with  an?neoplas?c  ac?vity  that   poten?ates  the  effect  of  chemotherapy  in  colon  and   other  cancers   Phase  3  studies  underway  in  pa?ents   with  colon  cancer   September  2013   3   TheColonVitamin.com  
  3. Beta  Carotene:  non-­‐smokers  &  non-­‐alcohol  drinkers  saw  a  decrease  in

     the  risk  of     one  or  more  recurrent  adenomatous  polyps.   Methods:  We  studied  the  effect  of  β-­‐carotene  supplementa?on  on  colorectal   adenoma  recurrence  among  subjects  in  a  mul?center  double-­‐blind,  placebo-­‐ controlled  clinical  trial  of  an?oxidants  for  the  preven?on  of  colorectal   adenomas.  A  total  of  864  subjects  who  had  had  an  adenoma  removed  and   were  polyp-­‐free  were  randomly  assigned  (in  a  factorial  design)  to  receive  β-­‐ carotene  (25  mg  or  placebo)  and/or  vitamins  C  and  E  in  combina?on  (1000   mg  and  400  mg,  respec?vely,  or  placebo),  and  were  followed  with   colonoscopy  for  adenoma  recurrence  1  year  and  4  years  a]er  the  qualifying   endoscopy.  A  total  of  707  subjects  had  two  follow-­‐up  examina?ons  and   provided  smoking  and  alcohol  use  data.  Adjusted  mul?variate  risk  ra?os   (RRs)  and  95%  confidence  intervals  (CIs)  were  used  to  assess  the  effects  of  β-­‐ carotene  on  adenoma  recurrence.     Results:  Among  subjects  who  neither  smoked  cigarePes  nor  drank  alcohol,  β-­‐ carotene  was  associated  with  a  marked  decrease  in  the  risk  of  one  or  more   recurrent  adenomas  (RR  =  0.56,  95%  CI  =  0.35  to  0.89),  but  β-­‐carotene   supplementa?on  conferred  a  modest  increase  in  the  risk  of  recurrence   among  those  who  smoked  (RR  =  1.36,  95%  CI  =  0.70  to  2.62)  or  drank  (RR  =   1.13,  95%  CI  =  0.89  to  1.43).  For  par?cipants  who  smoked  cigarePes  and  also   drank  more  than  one  alcoholic  drink  per  day,  β-­‐carotene  doubled  the  risk  of   adenoma  recurrence  (RR  =  2.07,  95%  CI  =  1.39  to  3.08;  P  for  difference  from   nonsmoker/nondrinker  RR  <  .001).     Conclusion:  Alcohol  intake  and  cigarePe  smoking  appear  to  modify  the  effect   of  β-­‐carotene  supplementa?on  on  the  risk  of  colorectal  adenoma  recurrence.   Journal  of  the  Na7onal  Cancer  Ins7tute  2003;  95:  717-­‐722     September  2013   4   TheColonVitamin.com  
  4. Calcium:  supplementa?on  is  associated  with  reduc?on  in  the  risk  of

     recurrent   adenomatous  polyps.   New  England  Journal  of  Medicine  199;  340:  101-­‐107     Background  and  Methods:  Laboratory,  clinical,  and  epidemiologic  evidence  suggests  that  calcium  may  help  prevent  colorectal  adenomas.  We   conducted  a  randomized,  double-­‐blind  trial  of  the  effect  of  supplementa?on  with  calcium  carbonate  on  the  recurrence  of  colorectal  adenomas.   We  randomly  assigned  930  subjects  (mean  age,  61  years;  72  percent  men)  with  a  recent  history  of  colorectal  adenomas  to  receive  either   calcium  carbonate  (3  g  [1200  mg  of  elemental  calcium]  daily)  or  placebo,  with  follow-­‐up  colonoscopies  one  and  four  years  a]er  the  qualifying   examina?on.  The  primary  end  point  was  the  propor?on  of  subjects  in  whom  at  least  one  adenoma  was  detected  a]er  the  first  follow-­‐up   endoscopy  but  up  to  (and  including)  the  second  follow-­‐up  examina?on.  Risk  ra?os  for  the  recurrence  of  adenomas  were  adjusted  for  age,  sex,   life?me  number  of  adenomas  before  the  study,  clinical  center,  and  length  of  the  surveillance  period.     Results:  The  subjects  in  the  calcium  group  had  a  lower  risk  of  recurrent  adenomas.  Among  the  913  subjects  who  underwent  at  least  one  study   colonoscopy,  the  adjusted  risk  ra?o  for  any  recurrence  of  adenoma  with  calcium  as  compared  with  placebo  was  0.85  (95  percent  confidence   interval,  0.74  to  0.98;  P=0.03).  The  main  analysis  was  based  on  the  832  subjects  (409  in  the  calcium  group  and  423  in  the  placebo  group)  who   completed  both  follow-­‐up  examina?ons.  At  least  one  adenoma  was  diagnosed  between  the  first  and  second  follow-­‐up  endoscopies  in  127   subjects  in  the  calcium  group  (31  percent)  and  159  subjects  in  the  placebo  group  (38  percent);  the  adjusted  risk  ra?o  was  0.81  (95  percent   confidence  interval,  0.67  to  0.99;  P=0.04).  The  adjusted  ra?o  of  the  average  number  of  adenomas  in  the  calcium  group  to  that  in  the  placebo   group  was  0.76  (95  percent  confidence  interval,  0.60  to  0.96;  P=0.02).  The  effect  of  calcium  was  independent  of  ini?al  dietary  fat  and  calcium   intake.     Conclusions:  Calcium  supplementa?on  is  associated  with  a  significant  -­‐  though  moderate  -­‐  reduc?on  in  the  risk  of  recurrent  colorectal   adenomas.   September  2013   5   TheColonVitamin.com  
  5. Folic  Acid  (Folate):  supplementa?on  is  associated  with  reduced  rate  of

     recurrent   adenomatous  polyps.   World  Journal  of  Gastroenterology  2008;  14:  4492-­‐4498     AIM:  To  determine  whether  folic  acid  supplementa?on  will  reduce  the   recurrence  of  colorectal  adenomas,  the  precursors  of  colorectal  cancer,  we   performed  a  double-­‐blind  placebo-­‐controlled  trial  in  pa?ents  with   adenomatous  polyps.     METHODS:  In  the  current  double-­‐blind,  placebo-­‐controlled  trial  at  this  VA   Medical  Center,  pa?ents  with  colorectal  adenomas  were  randomly  assigned   to  receive  either  a  daily  5  mg  dose  of  folic  acid  or  a  matched  iden?cal   placebo  for  3  years.  All  polyps  were  removed  at  baseline  colonoscopy  and   each  pa?ent  had  a  follow  up  colonoscopy  at  3  years.  The  primary  endpoint   was  a  reduc?on  in  the  number  of  recurrent  adenomas  at  3  years.   RESULTS:  Of  137  subjects,  who  were  eligible  a]er  confirma?on  of  polyp   histology  and  run-­‐in  period  to  conform  compliance,  94  completed  the  study;   49  in  folic  acid  group  and  45  in  placebo  group.  Recurrence  of  adenomas  at  3-­‐ year  was  compared  between  the  two  groups.  The  mean  number  of  recurrent   polyps  at  3-­‐year  was  0.36  (SD,  0.69)  for  folic  acid  treated  pa?ents  compared   to  0.82  (SD,  1.17)  for  placebo  treated  subjects,  resul?ng  in  a  3-­‐fold  increase  in   polyp  recurrence  in  the  placebo  group.  Pa?ents  below  70  years  of  age  and   those  with  le]-­‐sided  colonic  adenomas  or  advanced  adenomas  responded   bePer  to  folic  acid  supplementa?on.   CONCLUSION:  High  dose  folic  acid  supplementa?on  is  associated  with  a   significant  reduc?on  in  the  recurrence  of  colonic  adenomas  sugges?ng  that   folic  acid  may  be  an  effec?ve  chemopreven?ve  agent  for  colorectal   neoplasia.   September  2013   6   TheColonVitamin.com  
  6. Selenium:  supplementa?on  may  prevent  the  development  of  adenomatous  polyps.  

    American  Journal  of  Gastroenterology  2002;  97:  2103-­‐2108     OBJECTIVE:  Selenium  is  a  fundamental  nutrient  to  human  health  that  might  have   an?carcinogenic  effects.  Previous  studies  have  assessed  the  possible  rela?onship   of  selenium  status  to  colorectal  adenomas  with  controversial  results.  We   primarily  aimed  to  assess  the  rela?onship  of  serum  selenium  status  with  the   presence  of  large  size  colorectal  adenomas  in  subjects  living  in  a  poor  selenium   region.  The  serum  selenium  status  in  colorectal  cancer  was  also  evaluated.   METHODS:  Serum  selenium  levels  were  measured  in  28  pa?ents  with  large  size   sporadic  adenomatous  polyps,  24  pa?ents  with  colorectal  adenocarcinomas,  and   35  age-­‐matched  healthy  individuals.  A  logis?c  regression  analysis  was  performed   to  assess  the  rela?onship  of  serum  selenium  to  colorectal  adenomatous  polyps   a]er  adjus?ng  for  confounding  variables  (age,  sex,  smoking  habit,  and  alcohol   drinking).   RESULTS:  Among  subjects  aged  60  yr,  mean  serum  selenium  levels  were   significantly  lower  in  both  pa?ent  groups  (adenoma,  57.9    4.3  g/L;  cancer,  43.7     6.6  g/L)  than  in  healthy  controls  (88.9    8  g/L)  (p  =  0.0001).  There  were  no   difference  among  subjects  >60  yr  old.  A  significant  inverse  associa.on  between   selenium  status  and  the  diagnosis  of  large  size  adenomatous  polyps  aFer   adjus.ng  for  confounding  variables  was  found  (adjusted  p  =  0.029).  Subjects  with   higher  selenium  status  (75th  percen.le  value  of  82.11  g/L)  had  a  lower  probability   (OR  =  0.17,  95%  CI  =  0.03–0.84)  to  be  in  the  adenoma  group  than  subjects  with   lower  selenium  status  (<82.11  g/L).  This  associa.on  was  more  marked  in  subjects   aged  60  yr  (adjusted  p  value  =  0.04,  OR  =  0.08,  95%  CI  =  0.007–0.91),  and  was  not   significant  in  older  subjects.   CONCLUSIONS:  Results  suggest  that  high  selenium  status  may  decrease  the  risk  of   large  size  adenomas  in  a  low  selenium  region,  and  that  this  preven.ve  effect   seems  to  be  exclusive  to  subjects  60  yr.  These  results  will  need  to  be  confirmed  in   addi.onal  epidemiological  studies  before  recommending  selenium   supplementa.on  in  pa.ents  with  colon  adenomas.   September  2013   7   TheColonVitamin.com  
  7. Vitamin  B2:  high  levels  appear  to  be  protec?ve  against  adenomatous

     polyps.   Cancer  Epidemiology  Biomarkers  and  Preven7on  2008;  17:   2136-­‐2145     Background:  Folate,  other  vitamin  B  cofactors,  and  genes  involved  in  folate-­‐ mediated  one-­‐carbon  metabolism  all  may  play  important  roles  in  colorectal   neoplasia.  In  this  study,  we  examined  the  associa?ons  between  dietary  and   circula?ng  plasma  levels  of  vitamins  B2 ,  B6 ,  and  B12  and  risk  colorectal   adenomas.   Methods:  The  Aspirin/Folate  Polyp  Preven?on  Study  is  a  randomized  clinical   trial  of  folic  acid  supplementa?on  and  incidence  of  new  colorectal  adenomas   in  individuals  with  a  history  of  adenomas  (n  =  1,084).  Diet  and  supplement   use  were  ascertained  through  a  food  frequency  ques.onnaire  administered  at   baseline.  Blood  collected  at  baseline  was  used  to  determine  plasma  B-­‐vitamin   levels.  We  used  generalized  linear  regression  to  es.mate  risk  ra.os  (RR)  and   95%  confidence  intervals  (95%  CI)  as  measures  of  associa.on.   Results:  We  found  a  borderline  significant  inverse  associa.on  with  plasma  B6   [pyridoxal  5′-­‐phosphate  (PLP)]  and  adenoma  risk  (adjusted  RR  Q4  versus   Q1,  0.78;  95%  CI,  0.61-­‐1.00;  Ptrend  =  0.08).  This  associa.on  was  not  modified   by  folic  acid  supplementa.on  or  plasma  folate.  However,  the  protec.ve   associa.on  of  PLP  with  adenoma  risk  was  observed  only  among  subjects  who   did  not  drink  alcohol  (Pinterac.on  =  0.03).  Plasma  B2  (riboflavin)  was  inversely   associated  with  risk  of  advanced  lesions  (adjusted  RR  Q4  versus  Q1,  0.51;  95%   CI,  0.26-­‐0.99;  Ptrend  =  0.12).  No  significant  associa.ons  were  observed   between  adenoma  risk  and  plasma  vitamin  B12  or  dietary  intake  of  vitamin  B2   and  B6 .  When  we  examined  specific  gene-­‐B-­‐vitamin  interac.ons,  we  observed   a  possible  interac.on  between  methylenetetrahydrofolate  reductase  -­‐C677T   and  plasma  B2  on  risk  of  all  adenomas.   Conclusion:  Our  results  suggest  that  high  levels  of  PLP  and  B2  may  protect   against  colorectal  adenomas.  (Cancer  Epidemiol  Biomarkers  Prev  2008;17(8): 2136–45)   September  2013   8   TheColonVitamin.com  
  8. Vitamin  B6:    Vitamin  B6  levels  associated  with  a  decreased

     risk  of  colorectal  cancer.   Journal  of  the  American  Medical  Associa7on  2010;   303:  1077-­‐1083     Context    Moun?ng  evidence  indicates  that  vitamin  B6,  a  coenzyme  involved   in  nearly  100  enzyma?c  reac?ons,  may  reduce  the  risk  of  colorectal  cancer.   Objec7ve    To  conduct  a  systema?c  review  with  meta-­‐analysis  of  prospec?ve   studies  assessing  the  associa?on  of  vitamin  B6  intake  or  blood  levels  of   pyridoxal  5′-­‐phosphate  (PLP;  the  ac?ve  form  of  vitamin  B6)  with  risk  of   colorectal  cancer.   Data  Sources    Relevant  studies  were  iden?fied  by  a  search  of  MEDLINE  and   EMBASE  databases  to  February  2010,  with  no  restric?ons.  We  also  reviewed   reference  lists  from  retrieved  ar?cles.   Study  Selec7on    We  included  prospec?ve  studies  that  reported  rela?ve  risk   (RR)  es?mates  with  95%  confidence  intervals  (CIs)  for  the  associa?on   between  vitamin  B6  intake  or  blood  PLP  levels  and  the  risk  of  colorectal,   colon,  or  rectal  cancer.   Data  Extrac7on    Two  authors  independently  extracted  data  and  assessed   study  quality.  Study-­‐specific  RRs  were  pooled  using  a  random-­‐effects  model.   Data  Synthesis    Nine  studies  on  vitamin  B6  intake  and  4  studies  on  blood  PLP   levels  were  included  in  the  meta-­‐analysis.  The  pooled  RRs  of  colorectal   cancer  for  the  highest  vs  lowest  category  of  vitamin  B6  intake  and  blood  PLP   levels  were  0.90  (95%  CI,  0.75-­‐1.07)  and  0.52  (95%  CI,  0.38-­‐0.71),   respec?vely.  There  was  heterogeneity  among  studies  of  vitamin  B6  intake   (P  =  .01)  but  not  among  studies  of  blood  PLP  levels  (P  =  .95).  Omijng  1  study   that  contributed  substan.ally  to  the  heterogeneity  among  studies  of  vitamin   B6  intake  yielded  a  pooled  RR  of  0.80  (95%  CI,  0.69-­‐0.92).  The  risk  of   colorectal  cancer  decreased  by  49%  for  every  100-­‐pmol/mL  increase   (approximately  2  SDs)  in  blood  PLP  levels  (RR,  0.51;  95%  CI,  0.38-­‐0.69).   Conclusion    Vitamin  B6  intake  and  blood  PLP  levels  were  inversely   associated  with  the  risk  of  colorectal  cancer  in  this  meta-­‐analysis.   September  2013   9   TheColonVitamin.com  
  9. Vitamin  D:  intake  of  Vitamin  D  is  associated  with  a

     50%  lower  risk  of  developing     colorectal  cancer.   Journal  of  Steroid  Biochemistry  &  Molecular  Biology   2005;  97:  179-­‐194     Background   Inadequate  photosynthesis  or  oral  intake  of  Vitamin  D  are  associated  with   high  incidence  rates  of  colorectal  cancer,  but  the  dose–response  rela?onship   has  not  been  adequately  studied.   Methods   Dose–response  gradients  from  observa?onal  studies  of  Vitamin  D  intake  and   serum  25-­‐hydroxyvitamin  D  were  ploPed  as  trend  lines.  The  point  on  each   linear  trend  line  corresponding  to  an  odds  ra?o  of  0.50  provided  the   prediagnos?c  Vitamin  D  intake  or  25-­‐hydroxyvitamin  D  concentra?on   associated  with  50%  lower  risk  compared  to  <100  IU/day  Vitamin  D  or   <13  ng/ml  serum  25-­‐hydroxyvitamin  D.  Medians  of  these  values  were   determined.   Results   Overall,  individuals  with  ≥1000  IU/day  oral  Vitamin  D  (p  <  0.0001)  or  ≥33  ng/ ml  (82  nmol/l)  serum  25-­‐hydroxyvitamin  D  (p  <  0.01)  had  50%  lower   incidence  of  colorectal  cancer  compared  to  reference  values.   Conclusions   Intake  of  1000  IU/day  of  Vitamin  D,  half  the  safe  upper  intake  established  by   the  Na?onal  Academy  of  Sciences,  was  associated  with  50%  lower  risk.   Serum  25-­‐hydroxyvitamin  D  of  33  ng/ml,  which  is  known  to  be  safe,  also  was   associated  with  50%  lower  risk.  Prompt  public  health  ac?on  is  needed  to   increase  intake  of  Vitamin  D3  to  1000  IU/day,  and  to  raise  25-­‐hydroxyvitamin   D  by  encouraging  a  modest  dura?on  of  sunlight  exposure.   September  2013   10   TheColonVitamin.com  
  10. Curcumin:  possesses  an?-­‐cancer  ac?vity  &  poten?ates  the  effect  of  chemotherapy

     in     colon  and  other  cancers.   September  2013   11   TheColonVitamin.com   Abstract   The  most  prac?cal  approach  to  reduce  the  morbidity  and  mortality  of   cancer  is  to  delay  the  process  of  carcinogenesis  through  the  use  of   chemopreven?ve  agents.  This  necessitates  that  safer  compounds,   especially  those  derived  from  natural  sources  must  be  cri?cally   examined  for  chemopreven?on.  A  spice  common  to  India  and  the   surrounding  regions,  is  tur-­‐  meric,  derived  from  the  rhizome  of   Curcuma  longa.  Pre-­‐clinical  studies  in  a  variety  of  cancer  cell  lines   including  breast,  cervical,  colon,  gastric,  hepa?c,  leukemia,  oral   epithelial,  ovarian,  pancrea?c,  and  prostate  have  consistently  shown   that  curcumin  possesses  an?-­‐cancer  ac?vity  in  vitro  and  in  pre-­‐clinical   animal  models.  The  robust  ac?vity  of  curcumin  in  colo-­‐  rectal  cancer   has  led  to  five  phase  I  clinical  trials  being  completed  showing  the   safety  and  tolerability  of  curcumin  in  colo-­‐  rectal  cancer  pa?ents.  To   date  clinical  trials  have  not  iden?fied  a  maximum  tolerated  dose  of   curcumin  in  humans  with  clinical  trials  using  doses  up  to  8000  mg  per   day.  The  success  of  these  trials  has  led  to  the  development  of  phase  II   trials  that  are  currently  enrolling  pa?ents.  Overwhelming  in  vitro   evidence  and  completed  clinical  trials  suggests  that  curcumin  may   prove  to  be  useful  for  the  chemopreven?on  of  colon  cancer  in   humans.     This  review  will  focus  on  describing  the  pre-­‐  clinical  and  clinical   evidence  of  curcumin  as  a  chemopreven?ve  compound  in  colorectal   cancer.    Published  by  Elsevier  Ireland  Ltd.   Cancer  Le`ers  225  (2007)  170-­‐181  
  11. Dosages  MaPer   The  Colon  Vitamin  Dose   %  DV

     (Daily  Value)   Typical  Mul7-­‐vitamin  Dose    %DV  (Daily  Value)   Micronutrients   Vitamin  B2   3  mg,  176%   1.1  mg,  65%   Vitamin  B6   3  mg,  150%   2  mg,  100%   Folate   500  mcg,  125%   400  mcg,  100%   Calcium   800  mcg,  80%   500  mg,  50%   An7oxidants   Beta  Carotene   8,500  IU,  170%  (Vitamin  A)   1,014  IU,  20%   Vitamin  D   1,000  IU,  250%   800  IU,  200%   Selenium   100  mcg,  143%   55  mcg,  79%    Curcumin   25  mg   0   September  2013   12   TheColonVitamin.com  
  12. Delivering  the  right  dosages  to  the  right  place  at  

    the  right  ?me   White  tablet  releases  calcium  at  a  pH  of  7.0  thus   delivering  the  calcium  directly  to  the  colon  where   it  can  bind  with  faPy  acids  and  bile  acids  in  the  colon*   Yellow  tablet  releases  all  of  the  other  ingredients   into  the  small  intes?ne  where  they  are  absorbed   into  the  bloodstream  to  effect  their  benefit   *  Patent-­‐pending  formula.   September  2013   13   TheColonVitamin.com  
  13. Summary          Contains  natural      

      micronutrients  and   an?oxidants    that   have  been  shown  in   scien?fic  studies  to   either  prevent  colon   polyps  or  are   associated  with  a   reduced  risk  of  colon   cancer.            Contains  research-­‐ based  dosages   (different  from  typical   mul?-­‐vitamins)  to   deliver  more  effec?ve   benefits.              Has  a  unique   patent-­‐pending   delivery  mechanism   (SynerGI-­‐dosing™)  to   deliver  the  right   ingredients  to  the   right  loca?on  at  the   right    ?me.   September  2013   14   TheColonVitamin.com            Developed  by  a     gastroenterologist   who  is  well-­‐aware  of   the  need  and  the   scien?fic  research  to   create  the  solu?on