Analysis of an anti-Da'esh Psychological Operations exercise from April 2016 based on the unclassified material and a full report. http://www.icons.umd.edu/data/4952/ Trying to draw main lessons e.g. principles to follow in implementing PSYOPs.
J-39 SMA program, USASOC, DHS & University of Maryland ICONS PSYOP exercise & simulation of Counter Da’esh messaging ICONS III, April 2016 Topias Uotila, @THUotila
record and report of a large scale PSYOP (psychological operations) exercise was released to the public. • Released material includes for example: • Anonymised list of participants • All material created • List of meetings held and participants • Timeline of all communications • 69 page report on lessons learnt • http://www.icons.umd.edu/data/4952/
Run on a synchronous, virtual, and distributed multimedia platform called ICONSnet • One calendar week in April 2016 with Mon, Wed & Fri in battle time and Tue & Thu for control element to further scenario • White teams were manned with 30 regional experts
community in meeting training requirements in ways that reinforce the PSYOP process and enhance counter-Da’esh messaging. • Support the PSYOP community in integrating neuro-cognitive and social science concepts to refine counter-Da’esh message content and increase the effectiveness of the Information Operations (IO) campaign. • Assist the PSYOP community with understanding the operational environment (OE) and the human networks operating in the OE: friendly, threat, and neutral. Possible examples include providing a (Political, Military, Economic, Social, Information, and Infrastructure) PMESII framed OE analysis and center of gravity analysis.
concrete tested reservoir of messaging enable • high volume in communications • forcing the enemy to be reactive • free time to monitor communication and maintain presence • more innovative narrative strategies, such as edu-entertainment and targeting supporting audiences, rather than repetitively selling the same message to the same audience. • Example: “Team Mosul” staged 20-30 messages as draft
Disrupting the narrative space and motivating behavior change means painting a compelling and emotional picture of a desirable future. • Messaging that undermined Da’esh’s brand did not fill the vacuum of uncertainty because it lacked specifics and proof. • Behavior change comes from being able to see the future. • Effective communication is both strategic and creative • Narrative is more than a single message • Think holistically, respect history, appreciate context, tell a story, enlist collective values, generate analogies, and invite audience engagement • Engaging a specific target audience and maintaining control of the narrative space is not the same thing. • Multi-pronged message approach and nuanced target audiences. • Own the narrative space through repetition and mass messaging • Information overload shuts the enemy from the conversation. • Direct counter-messaging results in an echo chamber • At best ineffective • May even exposed ignorance & promote enemy’s view
operation objectives • Flexible enough to allow operators agility to maneuver • Set clear objectives for narrative campaigns conducted in support of overall strategy • Results in better narratives & allows fast development of messages tied into objectives • Participants can ensure they tie vulnerabilities into messaging • Contrast: In traditional doctrine, only the general theme is approved and each individual message must go back through an approval process. • Practitioners benefit from thinking strategically rather than reactively • Developing and protecting a brand narrative • Identifying psychological drivers of audience engagement beyond grievances such as affiliation, meaning, power, fear, identity, emotion, and instinct • Strategic message planning – choice of medium, anticipating response, defending messages, counter-messaging, and strategic timing.
the field to promote successful messaging and deploy resources • Practitioners can quickly decide what works and more efficiently deploy resources • Test effectiveness of messaging and refine the process in safe environments • Pre-produced media has limited value • Identify strategies for responding in real time to messaging • Text-only narratives are more agile • Red and White were quick to disprove visual products: “looks western” or “picture of the Shia” • Population was open to messaging in principle, but wanted to engage in a deeper conversation about how to effect change.
• The action is not just in the narrative, the action is the narrative • Messaging becomes the “voice-over”—determines the meaning of actions • Communication strategy needs to wrap back to the intelligence briefings • The most effective communication relates to observable events on the ground – regardless of truth. • Messaging only seen credible if it is reinforced through action • Words have power when linked together into a narrative • Narratives create a story the mind can understand to break down cognitive barriers • Propaganda was transparent and rejected as such • Repeated messaging about general ideas (empowerment, unity, fight back) became boring. • Only concrete references gained traction. • Localized media (tribes, neighborhoods, local religious and cultural leaders etc.) are effective.
experts are critical. • Reach back to unseen experts does not work. • Integration of cultural, psychological, and media production expertise is essential for authentic and specific messaging strategies from inception of primary narrative threads to media creation. • Develop messages in coordination with cultural and technical experts to take advantage of multidisciplinary insights • Neuroscience, political science, marketing, etc. • State Department is central and has the needed comms capabilities.